Wave Function Is not Amplitude of Probability Density
American Journal of Modern Physics
Volume 6, Issue 4, July 2017, Pages: 49-50
Received: Mar. 24, 2017; Accepted: Apr. 25, 2017; Published: Jun. 14, 2017
Views 2287      Downloads 194
Author
Marat Vladimirovich Guryev, Independent Scholar, Moscow, Russian Federation
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Wave function (WF) is usually accepted to be the amplitude of probability density of a particle at a given point of phase space. This assertion is often referred to as Born postulate (BP) which is one of foundations of quantum mechanics. It is obvious that BP requires the normalization of WF to the number of indistinguishable particles in the object under study. But calculation methods of quantum mechanics require normalization to unit regardless of the number of electrons in the atom. The simplest way to solve this contradiction is to reject BP and acknowledge that normalization of WF has no relation to the number of particles in the object under consideration. This contradiction was not noticed until now because BP was tested for WF of single particles only.
Keywords
Wave Function, Probability Density, Born Postulate, Normalization
To cite this article
Marat Vladimirovich Guryev, Wave Function Is not Amplitude of Probability Density, American Journal of Modern Physics. Vol. 6, No. 4, 2017, pp. 49-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170604.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
J. L. Basdevant, and J. Dalibard, “Quantum Mechanics”, Springer; Berlin, 2002.
[2]
S. Gasiorowiczs, “Quantum Physics,” third Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, 2003.
[3]
W. Greiner, “Quantum Mechanics, an Introduction,” fourth Edition, Springer, Berlin, 2001.
[4]
L. I. Schiff, “Quantum Mechanics,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949.
[5]
E. Merzbacher, “Quantum Mechanics”, second Edition, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York, 1970.
[6]
D. J. Griffiths, “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics,” Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1995.
[7]
F. Schwabl, “Quantum Mechanics”, fourth Edition, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2007.
[8]
D. Bohm, “Quantum Theory”, Prentice Hall, New York, 1952.
[9]
W. H. Zurek, Probabilities from entanglement, Born’s rule from envariance, Phys. Rev. A 71, 052105, (2005).
[10]
Grant, I. P. “Relativistic Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules”, Springer Science+Business Media; New York, 2007.
[11]
Matthew Redshaw, B. Pianna, J. Mount and Edmund G. Myers, Penning-trap measurement of the atomic masses of and uncertainties < 0.1 parts per ; Phys. Rev. A 79, 012507 (2009).
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186