| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Four Flowable Composites Bonded under Contamination: An Ex-Vivo Study

Received: 19 December 2014    Accepted: 4 January 2015    Published: 10 February 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength of the brackets bonded with adhesive and flowable composites under contamination by human blood and human saliva& to evaluate enamel damage post debonding using ARI index. Material and Methods: 100 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were used & shear bond strengths of 4 flowable composites and one conventional composite were evaluated under 2 bonding conditions: (1) contamination with saliva (2) contamination with blood. Contamination was done after the application of primer in all the groups and before bonding the brackets, decontamination was done by using the air water spray for 5 seconds and air drying the surface. Shear bond strengths were measured with universal testing machine after placing the bonded specimen in deionized water and incubator at 37˚C for 72 hours to permit adequate water absorption and equilibration. After debonding, each specimen was examined under a stereoscopic zoom microscope (10X) to identify the location of the bond failure. The residual composite remaining on the premolar was assessed by using the remnant index (ARI), where each specimen was scored according to the amount of material remaining on the enamel surface. Results: conventional composite showed the highest bond strength in both blood and salivary contaminations. Among the flowable composites, each behaved differently. Blood contamination showed reduced bond strengths in all the groups. Decontamination with air water spray and air drying the surface before bonding the brackets seems to be satisfactory. Conclusion: with use of a primer, flowable composites can be used to bond the orthodontic brackets under contamination and decontamination with air water spray for 5 seconds and air drying the surface before bonding seems to be satisfactory if contamination occurs after the application of the primer.

Published in International Journal of Materials Science and Applications (Volume 4, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19
Page(s) 47-51
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Shear Bond Strength, Flowable Composites, Contamination

References
[1] Newman G.V: Epoxy adhesion for orthodontic attachment. Progress report. Am J of OrthodDentofacialOrthop 1965:51(12):901-12.
[2] Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional and selfetching primers. Am J of OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2004; 125:357–360.
[3] Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: a SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:329–332
[4] Hormati AA, Fuller JL, Denehy GE. Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 100:34–38.
[5] Elaut J, Asscherickx K, VandeVannet B, Wehrbein H. Flowable composites for bonding lingual retainers. J ClinOrthod. 2002; 36:597–8.
[6] Webster MJ, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Khajotia SS, Sinha PK. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J of OrthodDentofacialw233 Orthop 2011; 119:54-58.
[7] Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch enamel treatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 333-40.
[8] Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL et al: Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentine using Scotchbond multi-purpose. Am J Dent 1994: 175-9
[9] Oztoprak MO, Isik F, Sayinshu K, Arun T, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with 4 adhesives. Am J of OrthodDentofacial Orthop 2007’131:238-242
[10] TancanUysal, Zafer Sari, and Abdullah Demir.Are the Flowable Composites Suitable for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding?. The Angle Orthodontist: October 2004, Vol. 74, No. 5, pp. 697-702
[11] Dong-Bum Ryou, Hyo-Sang Park, Kyo-Han Kim, and Tae-Yub Kwon. Use of Flowable Composites for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding. The Angle Orthodontist: November 2008, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 1105-1109.
[12] Cadenaro M, Codan B, Navarra CO, Marchesi G, Turco G, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L. Contraction stress, elastic modulus, and degree of conversion of three flowable composites. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Jun;119(3):241-5.
[13] Albaladejo A, Montero J, Gómez de Diego R, López-Valverde A. Effect of adhesive application prior to bracket bonding with flowable composites. Angle Orthod. 2011 Jul;81(4):716-20
[14] Lorenz Brauchli, Martina Eichenberger, Markus Steineck, and Andrea Wichelhaus. Influence of decontamination procedures on shear forces after contamination with blood or saliva. Am J of OrthodDentofacialOrthop 2010 Oct; 138(4):435-41.
[15] Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new light cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:231-6.
[16] Hormati AA, Fuller JL, Denehy GE. Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100:34-8.
[17] Neelagiri K, Kundabala M, Shashi RA, Thomas MS, Parolia A.Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dentistry 2010; 13:71-5.
[18] Sayinsu K, Isik F, Sezen S, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets bonded with a protective liquid polish and a light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:391-4.
[19] Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J orthod1975; 2:171-8
[20] Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a self-etching primer combined with a resin-modified glass ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126:703-8.
[21] Sunder Rao P S S , Richard J : An Introduction to Biostatistics, A manual for students in health sciences , New Delhi: Prentice hall of India. 86-160.
[22] Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Faltermeier R, Reicheneder C, Mussig D. Influence of filler level on the bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:494–8.
[23] Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ, Meyer RA. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1991;100:251
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sunil Kumar M., Mahantesh C., Umesh H. M., Ashita Talwar, Sufia Qaiser, et al. (2015). A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Four Flowable Composites Bonded under Contamination: An Ex-Vivo Study. International Journal of Materials Science and Applications, 4(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sunil Kumar M.; Mahantesh C.; Umesh H. M.; Ashita Talwar; Sufia Qaiser, et al. A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Four Flowable Composites Bonded under Contamination: An Ex-Vivo Study. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2015, 4(1), 47-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sunil Kumar M., Mahantesh C., Umesh H. M., Ashita Talwar, Sufia Qaiser, et al. A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Four Flowable Composites Bonded under Contamination: An Ex-Vivo Study. Int J Mater Sci Appl. 2015;4(1):47-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19,
      author = {Sunil Kumar M. and Mahantesh C. and Umesh H. M. and Ashita Talwar and Sufia Qaiser and Sonal Sahasrabudhe},
      title = {A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Four Flowable Composites Bonded under Contamination: An Ex-Vivo Study},
      journal = {International Journal of Materials Science and Applications},
      volume = {4},
      number = {1},
      pages = {47-51},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmsa.20150401.19},
      abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength of the brackets bonded with adhesive and flowable composites under contamination by human blood and human saliva& to evaluate enamel damage post debonding using ARI index. Material and Methods: 100 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were used & shear bond strengths of 4 flowable composites and one conventional composite were evaluated under 2 bonding conditions: (1) contamination with saliva (2) contamination with blood. Contamination was done after the application of primer in all the groups and before bonding the brackets, decontamination was done by using the air water spray for 5 seconds and air drying the surface. Shear bond strengths were measured with universal testing machine after placing the bonded specimen in deionized water and incubator at 37˚C for 72 hours to permit adequate water absorption and equilibration. After debonding, each specimen was examined under a stereoscopic zoom microscope (10X) to identify the location of the bond failure. The residual composite remaining on the premolar was assessed by using the remnant index (ARI), where each specimen was scored according to the amount of material remaining on the enamel surface. Results: conventional composite showed the highest bond strength in both blood and salivary contaminations. Among the flowable composites, each behaved differently. Blood contamination showed reduced bond strengths in all the groups. Decontamination with air water spray and air drying the surface before bonding the brackets seems to be satisfactory. Conclusion: with use of a primer, flowable composites can be used to bond the orthodontic brackets under contamination and decontamination with air water spray for 5 seconds and air drying the surface before bonding seems to be satisfactory if contamination occurs after the application of the primer.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Four Flowable Composites Bonded under Contamination: An Ex-Vivo Study
    AU  - Sunil Kumar M.
    AU  - Mahantesh C.
    AU  - Umesh H. M.
    AU  - Ashita Talwar
    AU  - Sufia Qaiser
    AU  - Sonal Sahasrabudhe
    Y1  - 2015/02/10
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19
    T2  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
    JF  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
    JO  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
    SP  - 47
    EP  - 51
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2327-2643
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20150401.19
    AB  - Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength of the brackets bonded with adhesive and flowable composites under contamination by human blood and human saliva& to evaluate enamel damage post debonding using ARI index. Material and Methods: 100 human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were used & shear bond strengths of 4 flowable composites and one conventional composite were evaluated under 2 bonding conditions: (1) contamination with saliva (2) contamination with blood. Contamination was done after the application of primer in all the groups and before bonding the brackets, decontamination was done by using the air water spray for 5 seconds and air drying the surface. Shear bond strengths were measured with universal testing machine after placing the bonded specimen in deionized water and incubator at 37˚C for 72 hours to permit adequate water absorption and equilibration. After debonding, each specimen was examined under a stereoscopic zoom microscope (10X) to identify the location of the bond failure. The residual composite remaining on the premolar was assessed by using the remnant index (ARI), where each specimen was scored according to the amount of material remaining on the enamel surface. Results: conventional composite showed the highest bond strength in both blood and salivary contaminations. Among the flowable composites, each behaved differently. Blood contamination showed reduced bond strengths in all the groups. Decontamination with air water spray and air drying the surface before bonding the brackets seems to be satisfactory. Conclusion: with use of a primer, flowable composites can be used to bond the orthodontic brackets under contamination and decontamination with air water spray for 5 seconds and air drying the surface before bonding seems to be satisfactory if contamination occurs after the application of the primer.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Dental College & Hospital, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India

  • Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Dental College & Hospital, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India

  • Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Dental College & Hospital, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India

  • Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Dental College & Hospital, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India

  • Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Dental College & Hospital, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India

  • Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, M. S. Ramaiah Dental College & Hospital, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India

  • Sections