International Journal of High Energy Physics

| Peer-Reviewed |

Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 3): Noninteraction Mass-to-Energy Conversion

Received: 20 June 2020    Accepted: 07 July 2020    Published: 22 July 2020
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Two situations are contrasted. First is a scenario in which a force (an interaction) is applied to a mass particle (or object) in order to increase its speed. When this particle is accelerated it gains kinetic energy. By means of electromagnetic interaction or repeated collisional impact, the mass particle may acquire ever greater speed and ever greater kinetic energy. But, by such means, the particle can never ever attain lightspeed. However, Nature has a noninteraction mechanism by which mass is compelled to travel at lightspeed and in doing so, the mass undergoes conversion to pure photonic energy. Under this noninteraction second scenario, the mass merely rests on the surface of a slowly collapsing gravitating body while the surface inflow of the space medium increases to its ultimate limit. With the aid of a schematic energy triangle, it is shown why lightspeed is unattainable under scenario #1; whereas lightspeed IS attainable under scenario #2 and in the process a total conversion of mass to energy occurs. Presented is a remarkably natural 100-percent conversion process that requires no new force, no new particle, and no radically new physics. Nor does it require changing any existing force. If theorists of the 20th century had recognized this mass-to-energy conversion mechanism, their understanding of gravitational collapse would have been radically different —it would have been perfectly natural.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14
Published in International Journal of High Energy Physics (Volume 7, Issue 1, June 2020)
Page(s) 19-31
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Mass-Energy Conversion, Photon Propagation, Gravitational Collapse, Black Hole Physics, Aether, Energy Layer, End-State Neutron Star, DSSU Theory

References
[1] Jeans, J. (1933) The Universe Around Us, 3rd Edition. Cambridge University Press, London. P139.
[2] Wilczek, F. (2008) The Lightness of Being. Basic Books, New York, N. Y.
[3] Okun, L. B. (1989) The Concept of Mass, Physics Today, V. 42, No. 6, 31. P32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.881171
[4] Ranzan, C. (2019) Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism, Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 520-551 (2019). https//doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2019.52030
[5] Ranzan, C. (2014) The Fundamental Process of Energy, Part I. Infinite Energy, Issue #113 Jan/Feb 2014. (http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue113/index.html)
[6] Ranzan, C. (2014) The Fundamental Process of Energy, Part II. Infinite Energy, Issue #114 Mar/Apr 2014. (http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue114/index.html)
[7] Ranzan, C. (2015) DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence, Physics Essays, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp 455-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-28.4.455
[8] Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt am Main (2018) How massive can neutron stars be? Science Daily (January 16, 2018). https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180116093650.htm
[9] Davies, P. and Gribbin, J. (1992) The Matter Myth, Simon & Schuster, Touchstone, New York.
[10] Gursky, H. (1977) Neutron Stars, Black Holes, and Supernovae, as in Frontiers of Astrophysics. Eugene H. Avrett, editor, (Harvard University Press, London, England, 1977) p158.
[11] Ranzan, C. (2018) The Nature of Gravity –How one factor unifies gravity’s convergent, divergent, vortex, and wave effects, International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp73-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijass.20180605.11
[12] Ranzan, C. (2016) The Nature of Gravitational Collapse, American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp 15-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20160402.11
[13] Greenstein, G. (1983) Frozen Star. Freundlich Books, New York. P197.
[14] Ranzan, C. (2020) Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 2): Energy Generation via Velocity Differential Blueshift, Physics Essays, Vol. 33. Publication pending.
[15] Ranzan, C. (2018) Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme Energy Particles, Physics Essays, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp 358-376 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-31.3.358
[16] Ranzan, C. (2017) The Nature of Gravitational Collapse, 2nd printing. DSSU Research, Niagara Falls. Available at www.cellularuniverse.org
[17] Gribbin, J. and Rees, M. (1989) Cosmic Coincidences, Dark Matter, Mankind, and Anthropic Cosmology. Bantam Books, New York. P157.
Author Information
  • DSSU Research, Niagara Falls, Canada

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Conrad Ranzan. (2020). Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 3): Noninteraction Mass-to-Energy Conversion. International Journal of High Energy Physics, 7(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Conrad Ranzan. Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 3): Noninteraction Mass-to-Energy Conversion. Int. J. High Energy Phys. 2020, 7(1), 19-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Conrad Ranzan. Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 3): Noninteraction Mass-to-Energy Conversion. Int J High Energy Phys. 2020;7(1):19-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14,
      author = {Conrad Ranzan},
      title = {Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 3): Noninteraction Mass-to-Energy Conversion},
      journal = {International Journal of High Energy Physics},
      volume = {7},
      number = {1},
      pages = {19-31},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijhep.20200701.14},
      abstract = {Two situations are contrasted. First is a scenario in which a force (an interaction) is applied to a mass particle (or object) in order to increase its speed. When this particle is accelerated it gains kinetic energy. By means of electromagnetic interaction or repeated collisional impact, the mass particle may acquire ever greater speed and ever greater kinetic energy. But, by such means, the particle can never ever attain lightspeed. However, Nature has a noninteraction mechanism by which mass is compelled to travel at lightspeed and in doing so, the mass undergoes conversion to pure photonic energy. Under this noninteraction second scenario, the mass merely rests on the surface of a slowly collapsing gravitating body while the surface inflow of the space medium increases to its ultimate limit. With the aid of a schematic energy triangle, it is shown why lightspeed is unattainable under scenario #1; whereas lightspeed IS attainable under scenario #2 and in the process a total conversion of mass to energy occurs. Presented is a remarkably natural 100-percent conversion process that requires no new force, no new particle, and no radically new physics. Nor does it require changing any existing force. If theorists of the 20th century had recognized this mass-to-energy conversion mechanism, their understanding of gravitational collapse would have been radically different —it would have been perfectly natural.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 3): Noninteraction Mass-to-Energy Conversion
    AU  - Conrad Ranzan
    Y1  - 2020/07/22
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14
    T2  - International Journal of High Energy Physics
    JF  - International Journal of High Energy Physics
    JO  - International Journal of High Energy Physics
    SP  - 19
    EP  - 31
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7448
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20200701.14
    AB  - Two situations are contrasted. First is a scenario in which a force (an interaction) is applied to a mass particle (or object) in order to increase its speed. When this particle is accelerated it gains kinetic energy. By means of electromagnetic interaction or repeated collisional impact, the mass particle may acquire ever greater speed and ever greater kinetic energy. But, by such means, the particle can never ever attain lightspeed. However, Nature has a noninteraction mechanism by which mass is compelled to travel at lightspeed and in doing so, the mass undergoes conversion to pure photonic energy. Under this noninteraction second scenario, the mass merely rests on the surface of a slowly collapsing gravitating body while the surface inflow of the space medium increases to its ultimate limit. With the aid of a schematic energy triangle, it is shown why lightspeed is unattainable under scenario #1; whereas lightspeed IS attainable under scenario #2 and in the process a total conversion of mass to energy occurs. Presented is a remarkably natural 100-percent conversion process that requires no new force, no new particle, and no radically new physics. Nor does it require changing any existing force. If theorists of the 20th century had recognized this mass-to-energy conversion mechanism, their understanding of gravitational collapse would have been radically different —it would have been perfectly natural.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections