A Correspondence with the Bag Model of a Pre-quantum B.-E. Condensate Model of Nucleon
International Journal of High Energy Physics
Volume 3, Issue 2, April 2016, Pages: 10-17
Received: Mar. 7, 2016;
Accepted: Mar. 15, 2016;
Published: Apr. 8, 2016
Views 3166 Downloads 122
Arghirescu S. Marius, State Office for Inventions and Trademarks, Bucharest, Romania
By a pre-quantum theory of the author, which consider the magnetic moment as etherono-quantonic vortex
of etherons and of quantons with mass mh
, and which retrieve the exponential form of the nuclear potential by a pre-quantum nucleon model resulted as Bose-Einstein condensate of gammons formed as pairs of quasielectrons, is proposed a new, pre-quantum model for the proton’s stability explaining, with repulsive “shell” of ~0.6fm radius, relative similar with the MIT, “Bag” Model but different from it, which explains the repulsive property of the impenetrable nucleonic volume in p-p scattering reactions by a repulsive property of its surface, given by a static pressure of internal kinetized quanta, with a Gaussian variation and with the maximal value corresponding to the B-constant of the MIT Bag Model. The resulted potential, acting over the impenetrable quantum volume of the quark- containing its current mass, can explain the quarks confining, in accordance with the known value of the deconfination temperature, Td
K, without the hypothesis of intermediary gluons.
Arghirescu S. Marius,
A Correspondence with the Bag Model of a Pre-quantum B.-E. Condensate Model of Nucleon, International Journal of High Energy Physics.
Vol. 3, No. 2,
2016, pp. 10-17.
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
M. Arghirescu, “A Quasi-Unitary Pre-Quantum Theory of Particles and Fields and Some Theoretical Implications”, IJHEP, July, 80-103, (2015).
M. Arghirescu, “A Revised Model of Photon Resulted by an Etherono-Quantonic Theory of Fields”, Open Access Library Journal, 2: e1920, (2015).
Pohl R., Antognini A., Nez F., Amaro F. D. et al., Nature, 466, 213, (2010).
R. Jastrow, Phys. Review, 81 (1951) 165.
A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, V. F. Weisskopf, New extended model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D9, 3471, (1974).
E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. Kogut, K. D. Lane, T. M. Yan, “Spectrum of charmed quark–antiquark bound states”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 369.
B. P. Kosyakov, E. Yu. Popov, M. A. Vronskii, “The bag and the string: Are they opposed?” Physics Letters B 744 (2015) 28–33.
S. Gasiorowicz and J. L. Rosner, Am. J. Phys. 49, 954 (1981).
P. R. Silva, “Quark Confinement and Metric Fluctuations”, arXiv: 0908.3282v1, (2009).
F. Karsch, E. Laermann, A. Peikert, Nucl. Phys. B 605, 579 (2001).
Mohamed S. El Naschie, IJHEP, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2014) 13-17.
K. N. Muhin, “Experimental Nuclear Physics”, Vol. 2, Ed. “Atomizdat”, Moscow (1974).
Y. Yan, R. Tegen- “N-N Scattering and Nucleon Quark core”, Science Asia, 27 (2001) 251.
K. Walsh, P. Genzer, “Perfect Liquid hot enough to be Quark Soup”, RHIC news, 15 february (2010).
G. Grandazzi, G. Ackerman, F. Lemarchand, Les silences de Tchernobyl: L'avenir contaminé’, Amazon, 23 mars (2006) 7-8.
Ashman, J.; EMC Collaboration; A measurement of the spin asymmetry and determination of the structure function g1 in deep inelastic muon-proton scattering, Physics Letters B 206 (2), (1988), 364.
J. Hansson, The “Proton Spin Crisis” — a Quantum Query’, Progress in Physics, July, (2010).
A. A. Rukhadze et al., “On the possible physical mechanism of Chernobyl catastrophe and the unsoundness of official conclusion”, arXiv: nucl-ex/0304024v1, (2003).
A. Hosaka, H. Toki, “Chiral bag model for the nucleon” Phys. Rept. 277 (1996) 65-188.