At the suggestion of H.A. Lorentz, Michelson’s famous experiment of 1881 was repeated in 1887 because of an alleged error pointed out by Potier. By overlooking a minor omission when compounding the newer data, the suggested correction did not materially change the original conclusion, namely, that light was propagated with constant speed (c) irrespective of the motion of its source or observer, contrary to classical Galilean principles. Though universally accepted, careful analysis reveals that, aside from the computational error, old forgotten actual astronomical data militate against this interpretation. Bypassing the limiting constant (c) may therefore open the road to advances in optics.
| Published in | Optics (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11 |
| Page(s) | 12-14 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Speed of Light, Michelson, Lorentz, Universal Constants
| [1] | Planck, M. The Universe in Light of Modern Physics. New York, NY, WW Norton, 60 (1941). |
| [2] | Michelson, A. Sur le movement relative de la Terre et de l’ether. Comtes Rendus 94, 520-23 (1882). |
| [3] | Michelson, A. A. The relative motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous ether. Amer J Sc 22(3),xxii, 120-29 (1881). |
| [4] | Michelson, A.A. Morley E W On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether. Amer J Sc 34, 333- 345. (1887). |
| [5] | Lorentz,H. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Relative_Motion_of_the_Earth_and_the_Aether. (1892). Accessed April 29, 2014. |
| [6] | FitzGerald, G. F. The Ether and the Earth’s Atmosphere. Science. 13. 390 (1889). |
| [7] | Einstein, A. Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus Demselben gezogenen Folgerungen. Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik (4), 411-462 (1908). |
| [8] | Einstein A. Die Relativitätstheorie. In Kultur der Gegenwart, Leipzig, B. G. Teubner (1), 703-713, (1915). |
| [9] | Roemer, O. A Demonstration concerning the Motion of Light. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 136, 233-36 (1677). |
| [10] | Mach, E. The Principles of Physical Optics (1926), New York, NY, Dover Publication, 23, (c1953). |
| [11] | Bradley, J. A new apparent Motion discovered in the Fixed Stars; its cause assigned; the Velocity and equable Motion of Light deduced. Phil Trans R. Soc. 35, 637-642 (1728). |
| [12] | Murphy E. A. The Logic of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Press, 24 (1976). |
| [13] | Mark, H. H. Optokinetics, Bloomington, IN, Xlibris (2011). |
| [14] | Priestley, J. The History and Present State of Discoveries relating to Vision, Light and Colours. London, J Johnson, 181 (1772). |
APA Style
Harry H. Mark. (2014). Speed of Light, the Vanished Points of Reference. Optics, 3(2), 12-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11
ACS Style
Harry H. Mark. Speed of Light, the Vanished Points of Reference. Optics. 2014, 3(2), 12-14. doi: 10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11
AMA Style
Harry H. Mark. Speed of Light, the Vanished Points of Reference. Optics. 2014;3(2):12-14. doi: 10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11,
author = {Harry H. Mark},
title = {Speed of Light, the Vanished Points of Reference},
journal = {Optics},
volume = {3},
number = {2},
pages = {12-14},
doi = {10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.optics.20140302.11},
abstract = {At the suggestion of H.A. Lorentz, Michelson’s famous experiment of 1881 was repeated in 1887 because of an alleged error pointed out by Potier. By overlooking a minor omission when compounding the newer data, the suggested correction did not materially change the original conclusion, namely, that light was propagated with constant speed (c) irrespective of the motion of its source or observer, contrary to classical Galilean principles. Though universally accepted, careful analysis reveals that, aside from the computational error, old forgotten actual astronomical data militate against this interpretation. Bypassing the limiting constant (c) may therefore open the road to advances in optics.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Speed of Light, the Vanished Points of Reference AU - Harry H. Mark Y1 - 2014/06/20 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11 DO - 10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11 T2 - Optics JF - Optics JO - Optics SP - 12 EP - 14 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7810 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.optics.20140302.11 AB - At the suggestion of H.A. Lorentz, Michelson’s famous experiment of 1881 was repeated in 1887 because of an alleged error pointed out by Potier. By overlooking a minor omission when compounding the newer data, the suggested correction did not materially change the original conclusion, namely, that light was propagated with constant speed (c) irrespective of the motion of its source or observer, contrary to classical Galilean principles. Though universally accepted, careful analysis reveals that, aside from the computational error, old forgotten actual astronomical data militate against this interpretation. Bypassing the limiting constant (c) may therefore open the road to advances in optics. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: