Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers

Yasuji Murakami

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers

Yasuji Murakami

Published in American Journal of Networks and Communications (Volume 5, Issue 1)

Received: 7 February 2016 Accepted: 17 February 2016 Published: 1 March 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Asynchronous optical packet switching seems to a suitable transport technology for the next-generation Internet due to the variable lengths of IP packets. Optical buffers in the output port are an integral part of solving contention by exploiting the time domain. Fiber delay lines (FDLs) are a well-known technique for achieving optical buffers, and various optical buffer architectures using FDLs have been proposed. These are generally classified into two types of structure: feed-forward (FF) or feedback (FB). In the FF buffers, optical packets are delayed at the output ports by passing through step-increasing-length multiple FDLs to avoid contentions, and in the FB buffers, optical packets are delayed by being fed back in re-circulating loop FDLs to avoid contentions. We report the detailed characteristics of optical FB buffers with the Post-Reservation (PostRes) policy and clarify the superiority of the FB buffers through simulations. For comparison, we also show the characteristics of FBSI (FB with step-increasing-length FDLs) and FF buffers. We found that 1) the blocking probabilities in the FB buffer were about 10^-2 lower than those in the FF buffer and 2) the blocking probabilities for the deterministic case in the FB buffer sharply dropped at D=1.0, where the packet length was equal to the FDL loop length. We carried out 10⁸ packet simulations. The results can be applied to the design of WDM optical packet switches and networks with the maximum throughput.

Published in	American Journal of Networks and Communications (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11
Page(s)	1-10
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Asynchronous Optical Switching, Optical Buffers, Feedback Optical Loop, Blocking Probabilities, Poisson Arrivals, General Packet Length

References

[1]	R. S Tucker et al, “Evolution of WDM Optical IP networks: A Cost and Energy Perspective,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 243-252, 2009.
[2]	G. Grasso et al, “Role of Integrated Photonics Technologies in the Realization of Terabit Nodes,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. B111-B119, 2009.
[3]	F. Callegati, “Optical Buffers for Variable Length Packets,” IEEE Commun. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 9, pp. 292-294, 2000.
[4]	C. M. Gauger, “Dimensioning of FDL Buffers for Optical Burst Switching Nodes,” in Proc. 6^th IFIP Working Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling, Feb. 2002.
[5]	R. C. Almeida, J. U. Pelegrini, and H. Waldman, “A generic-traffic optical buffer modeling for asynchronous optical switching networks,” IEEE Commun. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 175-177, 2005.
[6]	A. Rostami and S. S. Chakraborty, “On Performance of Optical Buffers with Specific Number of Circulations,” IEEE Photo. Tech. Lett., Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 1570-1572, 2005.
[7]	T. Zhang, K. Lu, and J. Jue, “Shared Fiber Delay Line Buffers in Asynchronous Optical Packet Swiches,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 118-127, 2006.
[8]	C. M. Gauger, H. Buchta, and E. Partzak, “Integrated Evaluation of Performance and Technology – Throuput of Optical Burst Switching Nodes Under Dynamic Traffic,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 26, No. 13, pp. 1969-1979, 2008.
[9]	Jianming Liu et al., “Blocking and Delay Analysis of Single Wavelength Optical Buffer with General Packet Size Distribution,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 955-966, 2009.
[10]	H. E. Kankaya and N. Akar, “Exact Analysis of Single-Wavelength Optical Buffers with Feedback Markov Fluid Queues,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 530-542, 2009.
[11]	W. Rogiest, and H. Bruneel, “Exact Optimization Method for an FDL Buffer with Variable Packet Length”, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 242-244, 2010.
[12]	N. Akar and K. Sohraby, “Retrial Queuing Models of Multi-Wavelength FDL Feedback Optical Buffers,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 59, No. 10, pp. 2832-2840, 2011.
[13]	Murakami Y., “An Approximation for Blocking Probabilities and Delays of Optical Buffer With General Packet-Length Distributions,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 54-66, 2012.
[14]	D. Tafani, C. McArdle, and L. P. Barry, “A Two-Moment Performance Analysis of Optical Burst Switched Networks with Shared Fibre Delay Lines in a Feedback Configuration,” Optical Switching and Networking, Elsevier, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 323-335, 2012.
[15]	N. Akar, and Y. Gunalay, “Dimensioning Shared-per-Node Recirculating Fiber Delay Line Buffers in an Optical Packet Switch,” Performance Evaluation, Vo. 7, No. 12, pp. 1059-1071, 2013.
[16]	Y. Murakami, “Asymptotic Analysis for Blocking Probabilities of Optical Buffer with General Packet-Length Distributions,” American J. Appl. Mathematics, Vol. 2, No. 6-1, pp. 1-10, 2014.
[17]	R. Srivastava, R. K. Singh, and Y. N. Singh, “Design Analysis of Optical Loop Memory,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 27, No. 21, pp. 4821-4831, 2009.
[18]	Q. Xu et. al “Analysis of Large-Scale Multi-Stage All-Optical Packet Switching Routers,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 412-425, 2012.
[19]	H. Rastegarfar, A. Leon-Garcia, S. LaRochelle, and L. A. Rusch, “Cross-Layer Performance Analysis of Recirculation Buffers for Optical Data Centers,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 432-445, 2013.
[20]	J. R. Artalejo and A. Gornez-Corral, “Retrial Queueing Systems”, Springer, 2008.
[21]	E. A. Pekoz and N. Joglekar, “Poisson traffic Flow in a General Feedback Queue,” L. Appl. Prob., Vol. 39, pp. 630-636, 2002.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yasuji Murakami. (2016). Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers. American Journal of Networks and Communications, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yasuji Murakami. Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers. Am. J. Netw. Commun. 2016, 5(1), 1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yasuji Murakami. Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers. Am J Netw Commun. 2016;5(1):1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11,
  author = {Yasuji Murakami},
  title = {Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers},
  journal = {American Journal of Networks and Communications},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-10},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnc.20160501.11},
  abstract = {Asynchronous optical packet switching seems to a suitable transport technology for the next-generation Internet due to the variable lengths of IP packets. Optical buffers in the output port are an integral part of solving contention by exploiting the time domain. Fiber delay lines (FDLs) are a well-known technique for achieving optical buffers, and various optical buffer architectures using FDLs have been proposed. These are generally classified into two types of structure: feed-forward (FF) or feedback (FB). In the FF buffers, optical packets are delayed at the output ports by passing through step-increasing-length multiple FDLs to avoid contentions, and in the FB buffers, optical packets are delayed by being fed back in re-circulating loop FDLs to avoid contentions. We report the detailed characteristics of optical FB buffers with the Post-Reservation (PostRes) policy and clarify the superiority of the FB buffers through simulations. For comparison, we also show the characteristics of FBSI (FB with step-increasing-length FDLs) and FF buffers. We found that 1) the blocking probabilities in the FB buffer were about 10-2 lower than those in the FF buffer and 2) the blocking probabilities for the deterministic case in the FB buffer sharply dropped at D=1.0, where the packet length was equal to the FDL loop length. We carried out 108 packet simulations. The results can be applied to the design of WDM optical packet switches and networks with the maximum throughput.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers
AU  - Yasuji Murakami
Y1  - 2016/03/01
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11
T2  - American Journal of Networks and Communications
JF  - American Journal of Networks and Communications
JO  - American Journal of Networks and Communications
SP  - 1
EP  - 10
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-8964
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11
AB  - Asynchronous optical packet switching seems to a suitable transport technology for the next-generation Internet due to the variable lengths of IP packets. Optical buffers in the output port are an integral part of solving contention by exploiting the time domain. Fiber delay lines (FDLs) are a well-known technique for achieving optical buffers, and various optical buffer architectures using FDLs have been proposed. These are generally classified into two types of structure: feed-forward (FF) or feedback (FB). In the FF buffers, optical packets are delayed at the output ports by passing through step-increasing-length multiple FDLs to avoid contentions, and in the FB buffers, optical packets are delayed by being fed back in re-circulating loop FDLs to avoid contentions. We report the detailed characteristics of optical FB buffers with the Post-Reservation (PostRes) policy and clarify the superiority of the FB buffers through simulations. For comparison, we also show the characteristics of FBSI (FB with step-increasing-length FDLs) and FF buffers. We found that 1) the blocking probabilities in the FB buffer were about 10-2 lower than those in the FF buffer and 2) the blocking probabilities for the deterministic case in the FB buffer sharply dropped at D=1.0, where the packet length was equal to the FDL loop length. We carried out 108 packet simulations. The results can be applied to the design of WDM optical packet switches and networks with the maximum throughput.
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Yasuji Murakami

Telecommunications and Computer Networks, Osaka Electro-Communication University, Osaka, Japan

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yasuji Murakami. (2016). Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers. American Journal of Networks and Communications, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yasuji Murakami. Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers. Am. J. Netw. Commun. 2016, 5(1), 1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yasuji Murakami. Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers. Am J Netw Commun. 2016;5(1):1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11,
  author = {Yasuji Murakami},
  title = {Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers},
  journal = {American Journal of Networks and Communications},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-10},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnc.20160501.11},
  abstract = {Asynchronous optical packet switching seems to a suitable transport technology for the next-generation Internet due to the variable lengths of IP packets. Optical buffers in the output port are an integral part of solving contention by exploiting the time domain. Fiber delay lines (FDLs) are a well-known technique for achieving optical buffers, and various optical buffer architectures using FDLs have been proposed. These are generally classified into two types of structure: feed-forward (FF) or feedback (FB). In the FF buffers, optical packets are delayed at the output ports by passing through step-increasing-length multiple FDLs to avoid contentions, and in the FB buffers, optical packets are delayed by being fed back in re-circulating loop FDLs to avoid contentions. We report the detailed characteristics of optical FB buffers with the Post-Reservation (PostRes) policy and clarify the superiority of the FB buffers through simulations. For comparison, we also show the characteristics of FBSI (FB with step-increasing-length FDLs) and FF buffers. We found that 1) the blocking probabilities in the FB buffer were about 10-2 lower than those in the FF buffer and 2) the blocking probabilities for the deterministic case in the FB buffer sharply dropped at D=1.0, where the packet length was equal to the FDL loop length. We carried out 108 packet simulations. The results can be applied to the design of WDM optical packet switches and networks with the maximum throughput.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Blocking Probability Simulations for FDL Feedback Optical Buffers
AU  - Yasuji Murakami
Y1  - 2016/03/01
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11
T2  - American Journal of Networks and Communications
JF  - American Journal of Networks and Communications
JO  - American Journal of Networks and Communications
SP  - 1
EP  - 10
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-8964
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160501.11
AB  - Asynchronous optical packet switching seems to a suitable transport technology for the next-generation Internet due to the variable lengths of IP packets. Optical buffers in the output port are an integral part of solving contention by exploiting the time domain. Fiber delay lines (FDLs) are a well-known technique for achieving optical buffers, and various optical buffer architectures using FDLs have been proposed. These are generally classified into two types of structure: feed-forward (FF) or feedback (FB). In the FF buffers, optical packets are delayed at the output ports by passing through step-increasing-length multiple FDLs to avoid contentions, and in the FB buffers, optical packets are delayed by being fed back in re-circulating loop FDLs to avoid contentions. We report the detailed characteristics of optical FB buffers with the Post-Reservation (PostRes) policy and clarify the superiority of the FB buffers through simulations. For comparison, we also show the characteristics of FBSI (FB with step-increasing-length FDLs) and FF buffers. We found that 1) the blocking probabilities in the FB buffer were about 10-2 lower than those in the FF buffer and 2) the blocking probabilities for the deterministic case in the FB buffer sharply dropped at D=1.0, where the packet length was equal to the FDL loop length. We carried out 108 packet simulations. The results can be applied to the design of WDM optical packet switches and networks with the maximum throughput.
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download