American Journal of Nursing Science

| Peer-Reviewed |

Nurses’ Cyberloafing and Its Relationship to Procrastination and Conscientiousness in Damanhour National Medical Institute

Received: 10 February 2019    Accepted: 11 March 2019    Published: 25 March 2019
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Cyber-loafing involves an unproductive use of time in the workplace and distracts employees from their responsibilities and duties. This study was conducted because there is a risk posed on patient's safety if nurses are cyberloafing and if this behavior has a direct relation with procrastination and lack of conscientiousness. Aim of the study: to determine the relationship between cyberloafing, procrastination and conscientiousness among staff nurses working in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Research Design: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design with a self-reporting questionnaire was used to obtain data. Setting: The study was conducted in all inpatients units except Intensive Care Units (N=10) in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Subjects: A convenience sampling technique was used to recruit the participants of 157 (professional and technical nurses) were present and agreed to participate in the study. Instruments: The questionnaire consisted of three main scales and a demographic data sheet. The scales were namely; cyberloafing scale, procrastination scale, and conscientiousness scale. Results: There are significant correlations between cyberloafing variety and cyberloafing frequency, procrastination and conscientiousness where p= <0.001 for the three variables respectively. Regarding, cyberloafing frequency, a negative significant correlation was found with procrastination where p= <0.001 and a positive significant correlation with conscientiousness where p= 0.048. Another positive significant correlation was found between procrastination and conscientiousness in which p= <0.001. Recommendations: more extensive and in-depth research on procrastination and conscientiousness in a private sector, where there is more availability of personal computer and internet connections would be beneficial.

DOI 10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13
Published in American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2019)
Page(s) 48-58
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cyberloafing, Cyberslacking, Personal Use of Computer, Procrastination Among Nurses, Conscientiousness

References
[1] Griffiths M. Internet abuse and internet addiction in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2010 Sep 14; 22 (7): 463-72.
[2] Lim VK. The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior. 2002 Aug; 23 (5): 675-94.
[3] Phillips JG, Reddie L. Decisional style and self-reported email use in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007 Sep 1; 23 (5): 2414-28.
[4] Blanchard AL, Henle CA. Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior. 2008 May 31; 24 (3): 1067-84.
[5] Lim VK, Teo TS. Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study. Information & Management. 2005 Dec 31; 42 (8): 1081-93.
[6] Piotrowski C. Cyberloafing: A content analysis of the emerging literature. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2012 Sep 1; 39 (3/4): 259.
[7] Ozler DE, Polat G. Cyberloafing phenomenon in organizations: Determinants and impacts. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies. 2012 Dec 1; 4 (2): 1-5.
[8] Garrett RK, Danziger JN. On cyberslacking: Workplace status and personal Internet use at work. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2008 Jun 1; 11 (3): 287-92.
[9] Ugrin JC, Pearson JM, Odom MD. Cyber-slacking: Self-control, prior behavior and the impact of deterrence measures. Review of Business Information Systems (RBIS). 2011 May 31; 12 (1): 75-88.
[10] Baumgart DC. Smartphones in clinical practice, medical education, and research. Archives of internal medicine. 2011 Jul 25; 171 (14): 1294-6.
[11] Divall P, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Baker R. The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: a systematic review. Health informatics journal. 2013 Mar; 19 (1): 16-28.
[12] Yeung MS, Lapinsky SE, Granton JT, Doran DM, Cafazzo JA. Examining nursing vital signs documentation workflow: barriers and opportunities in general internal medicine units. Journal of clinical nursing. 2012 Apr 1; 21 (7-8): 975-82.
[13] Shepherd JD, Badger-Brown KM, Legassic MS, Walia S, Wolfe DL. SCI-U: E-learning for patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2012 Sep 1; 35 (5): 319-29.
[14] Elias BL, Fogger SA, McGuinness TM, D'Alessandro KR. Mobile apps for psychiatric nurses. Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services. 2013 Dec 4; 52 (4): 42-7.
[15] Sohn W, Shreim S, Yoon R, Huynh VB, Dash A, Clayman R, Lee HJ. Endockscope: using mobile technology to create global point of service endoscopy. Journal of endourology. 2013 Sep 1; 27 (9): 1154-60.
[16] Zuo KJ, Guo D, Rao J. Mobile teledermatology: a promising future in clinical practice. Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. 2013 Nov; 17 (6): 387-91.
[17] Nasar JL, Troyer D. Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013 Aug 31; 57: 91-5.
[18] Wu RC, Lo V, Morra D, Wong BM, Sargeant R, Locke K, Cavalcanti R, Quan SD, Rossos P, Tran K, Cheung M. The intended and unintended consequences of communication systems on general internal medicine inpatient care delivery: a prospective observational case study of five teaching hospitals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2013 Jan 25; 20 (4): 766-77.
[19] Black E, Light J, Black NP, Thompson L. Online social network use by health care providers in a high traffic patient care environment. Journal of medical Internet research. 2013 May; 15 (5).
[20] Coker BL. Freedom to surf: the positive effects of workplace Internet leisure browsing. New Technology, Work and Employment. 2011 Nov 1; 26 (3): 238-47.
[21] Lim VK, Chen DJ. Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work?. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2012 Apr 1; 31 (4): 343-53.
[22] Prasad S, Lim VK, Chen DJ. Self-Regulation, Individual Characteristics and Cyberloafing. InPACIS 2010 Jul 9 (p. 159).
[23] Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. Journal of medical Internet research. 2012 Sep; 14 (5).
[24] Patterson P. Smartphones, tablets in the OR: with benefits come distractions. OR manager. 2012 Apr; 28 (4): 1-6.
[25] Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI). Top 10 health technology hazards for 2014. Health Dev. 2013; 42 (11). Available at: https://www.ecri.org/Resources/Whitepapers_and_reports/2014_Top_10_Hazards_Executive_Brief.pdf Retrieved Feb 2019.
[26] American Association of Nurse Anesthetists [AANA]. Mobile Device Use, Position statement number 2.18. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. (2013) Available at: https://www.aana.com/docs/default-source/practice-aana-com-web-documents-(all)/mobile-information-technology.pdf?sfvrsn=610049b1_2, Retrieved Feb 2019
[27] Prinz, A. (2011). Professional social networking for nurses. American Nurse Today, 6 (7). Retrieved from www.americannursetoday.com/article.aspx?id=8016&fid=
[28] Fraser, R. (2011). The Nurse’s Social Media Advantage: How Making Connections and Sharing Ideas Can Enhance Your Nursing Practice. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau.
[29] Royal College of Nursing. (2009). Legal advice for RCN members using the Internet. Retrieved from www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/272195/003557.pdf
[30] Anderson, J. & Puckrin, K. (2011). Social network use: A test of self-regulation. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2 (1), 36-41.
[31] Davis, R., Flett, G. L., & Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a New Scale for Measuring Problematic Internet Use: Implications for Pre-employment Screening. Cyberpsychology Behavior, 5 (4), pp. 331- 345.
[32] O., Reinecke, L., Schmutzer, G., Stark, B., Wölfling, K., 2016. Procrastination, distress and life satisfaction across the Age Range - A German Representative Community Study. PLoS One 11, e0148054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148054.
[33] Billieux J, Chanal J, Khazaal Y, Rochat L, Gay P, Zullino D, Van der Linden M. Psychological predictors of problematic involvement in massively multiplayer online role-playing games: illustration in a sample of male cybercafe players. Psychopathology. 2011; 44 (3): 165-71.
[34] Gentile DA, Choo H, Liau A, Sim T, Li D, Fung D, Khoo A. Pathological video game use among youths: a two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 2011 Jan 12: peds-2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1353.
[35] Giannakos MN, Chorianopoulos K, Giotopoulos K, Vlamos P. Using Facebook out of habit. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2013 Jun 1; 32 (6): 594-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.659218.
[36] The Ottawa Citizen (2008). Procrastination a personality trait. You're sitting at your desk, and you've got work to do. from Canada.com website: http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=4ca892ae-5ebd-411b-96bd-75163f6c6f4d.
[37] Steel P. Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: Do they exist?. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010 Jun 1; 48 (8): 926-34.
[38] Akinsola MK, Tella A, Tella A. Correlates of academic procrastination and mathematics achievement of university undergraduate students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 2007 Nov 1; 3 (4): 363-70.
[39] Chun Chu AH, Choi JN. Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of" active" procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance. The Journal of social psychology. 2005 Jun 1; 145 (3): 245-64.
[40] Sirois FM, Kitner R. Less adaptive or more maladaptive? A meta-analytic investigation of procrastination and coping. European Journal of Personality. 2015 Jul; 29 (4): 433-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1985.
[41] Kim KR, Seo EH. The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015 Aug 1; 82: 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.038.
[42] Ferrari JR, Doroszko E, Joseph N. Exploring procrastination in corporate settings: Sex, status, and settings for arousal and avoidance types. Individual Differences Research. 2005 Aug 1; 3 (2): 140-9.
[43] Lay CH. At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of research in personality. 1986 Dec 1; 20 (4): 474-95.
[44] Freeman EK, Cox-Fuenzalida LE, Stoltenberg I. Extraversion and arousal procrastination: Waiting for the kicks. Current Psychology. 2011 Dec 1; 30 (4): 375-82.
[45] Steel P. The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological bulletin. 2007 Jan; 133 (1): 65.
[46] Ferrari JR, Pychyl TA. "If I Wait, My Partner Will Do It:" The Role of Conscientiousness as a Mediator in the Relation of Academic Procrastination and Perceived Social Loafing. North American Journal of Psychology. 2012 Mar 1; 14 (1). 13-24.
[47] Chapman BP. Bandwidth and fidelity on the NEO-five factor inventory: replicability and reliability of item cluster subcomponents. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2007 Mar 27; 88 (2): 220-34.
[48] Ehrenberg A, Juckes S, White KM, Walsh SP. Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people's technology use. Cyberpsychology & behavior. 2008 Dec 1; 11 (6): 739-41.
[49] Jackson JJ, Bogg T, Walton KE, Wood D, Harms PD, Lodi-Smith J, Edmonds GW, Roberts BW. Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: A multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2009 Feb; 96 (2): 446.
[50] Artistico D, Rothenberg AM. Assessing strengths and weaknesses in solving work problems: A Knowledge and Appraisal Personality Architecture (KAPA) analysis of the trait conscientiousness and self-efficacy. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2013 Aug 6; 5 (3): 84.
[51] Neal A, Yeo G, Koy A, Xiao T. Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2012 Feb; 33 (2): 175-92.
[52] Westerman JW, Simmons BL. The effects of work environment on the personality-performance relationship: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues. 2007 Jul 1: 288-305.
[53] Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of management journal. 2007 Apr 1; 50 (2): 327-47.
[54] Chang HY, Shyu YI, Wong MK, Chu TL, Lam SM, Teng CI. Human Resource Strategies for Nurses: The Positive Impact of Conscientiousness and Neuroticism on Patient Safety. Journal of Trademarks.. 2018 Jun 1; 10 (2): 151-68.
[55] Lamb C, Babenko-Mould Y, Evans M, Wong CA, Kirkwood KW. Conscientious objection and nurses: Results of an interpretive phenomenological study. Nursing ethics. 2018 Jan 1: 0969733018763996.
[56] Lamb C, Evans M, Babenko-Mould Y, Wong C, Kirkwood K. Nurses’ use of conscientious objection and the implications for conscience. Journal of advanced nursing. 2018 Oct 16.
[57] Fleming V, Ramsayer B, Zakšek TŠ. Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion. Journal of medical ethics. 2018 Feb 1; 44 (2): 104-8.
[58] Dudley NM, Orvis KA, Lebiecki JE, Cortina JM. A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006 Jan; 91 (1): 40.
[59] Mashi MS, Salimon MG. Consideration of future consequences as an antecedent of employee cyberloafing behavior among selected working adults in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship. 2016; 6 (2): 319-34.
[60] Vitak J, Crouse J, LaRose R. Personal Internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking. Computers in Human Behavior. 2011 Sep 1; 27 (5): 1751-9.
[61] The Items in the 45 Preliminary IPIP Scales Measuring the 45 AB5C Facets. Available at: https://ipip.ori.org/newAB5CKey.htm#Conscientiousness, Retrieved Feb 2019
[62] Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara P. Reconsidering the boundaries of the cyberloafing activity: the case of a university. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2012 May 1; 31 (5): 469-79.
[63] Woods F. A study into the relationship between cyberloafing, procrastination and conscientiousness in the workplace. May 2014. Available at https://esource.dbs.ie/bitstream/handle/10788/2074/hdip_woods_f_2014.pdf?sequence=1, Accessed on 6 January 2019.
[64] Garrett RK, Danziger JN. Disaffection or expected outcomes: Understanding personal Internet use during work. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008 Jul 1; 13 (4): 937-58.
[65] Piotrowski C. Counterproductive work behavior: Topical domain in emergent research. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2013 Sep 1; 40 (3): 78.
[66] Choi JN, Moran SV. Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale. The Journal of social psychology. 2009 Apr 1; 149 (2): 195-212.
[67] Schödl MM, Raz A, Kluger AN. On the Positive Side of Avoidance Motivation: An Increase in Avoidance Motivation Reduces Procrastination among Students. Applied Psychology. 2018 Oct; 67 (4): 655-85.
[68] Codina N, Valenzuela R, Pestana JV, Gonzalez-Conde J. Relations between student procrastination and teaching styles: autonomy-supportive and controlling. Frontiers in psychology. 2018; 9.
[69] Martinčeková L, Enright RD. The effects of self-forgiveness and shame-proneness on procrastination: exploring the mediating role of affect. Current Psychology. 2018: 1-0.
[70] Zhang Y, Dong S, Fang W, Chai X, Mei J, Fan X. Self-efficacy for self-regulation and fear of failure as mediators between self-esteem and academic procrastination among undergraduates in health professions. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2018 May 29: 1-4.
[71] Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. Measuring the Digital Society in Egypt: Internet at a glance. Statistical Profile. (2015). Available at http://www.mcit.gov.eg/Upcont/Documents/Publications_1272015000_Measuring_the_Digital_Society_in_Egypt_12_.pdf Accessed on 8 January 2019.
[72] Jia H, Jia R, Karau S. Cyberloafing and personality: The impact of the Big Five traits and workplace situational factors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2013 Aug; 20 (3): 358-65.
[73] Stavropoulos V, Alexandraki K, Motti-Stefanidi F. Flow and telepresence contributing to Internet abuse: Differences according to gender and age. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013 Sep 1; 29 (5): 1941-8.
[74] Kumar M, Govindarajo NS. Malaysian Y generation consumer research: Does gender and technology literacy affirmative towards e-commerce activities?. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies. 2014; 6 (12): 906-18.
[75] Weatherbee T G. Counterproductive use of technology at work: Information & communications technologies and cyberdeviancy. Human Resource Management Review, 2009; 20 (1): 35-44.
[76] Ugrin JC, Pearson JM, Odom MD. Profiling cyber-slackers in the workplace: Demographic, cultural, and workplace factors. Journal of Internet Commerce. 2008 Oct 8; 6 (3): 75-89.
[77] Restubog SL, Garcia PR, Toledano LS, Amarnani RK, Tolentino LR, Tang RL. Yielding to (cyber)-temptation: Exploring the buffering role of self-control in the relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing behavior in the workplace. Journal of Research in Personality. 2011 Apr 1; 45 (2): 247-51.
[78] Black E, Light J, Black NP, Thompson L. Online social network use by health care providers in a high traffic patient care environment. Journal of medical Internet research. 2013 May; 15 (5).
[79] Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. Journal of medical Internet research. 2012 Sep; 14 (5).
Author Information
  • Nursing Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, The British University in Egypt (BUE), Cairo, Egypt; Nursing Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt

  • Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Al Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Nursing Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yaldez Khairy Zein El Din, Fatma Mostafa Baddar. (2019). Nurses’ Cyberloafing and Its Relationship to Procrastination and Conscientiousness in Damanhour National Medical Institute. American Journal of Nursing Science, 8(2), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yaldez Khairy Zein El Din; Fatma Mostafa Baddar. Nurses’ Cyberloafing and Its Relationship to Procrastination and Conscientiousness in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2019, 8(2), 48-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yaldez Khairy Zein El Din, Fatma Mostafa Baddar. Nurses’ Cyberloafing and Its Relationship to Procrastination and Conscientiousness in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Am J Nurs Sci. 2019;8(2):48-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13,
      author = {Yaldez Khairy Zein El Din and Fatma Mostafa Baddar},
      title = {Nurses’ Cyberloafing and Its Relationship to Procrastination and Conscientiousness in Damanhour National Medical Institute},
      journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
      volume = {8},
      number = {2},
      pages = {48-58},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20190802.13},
      abstract = {Cyber-loafing involves an unproductive use of time in the workplace and distracts employees from their responsibilities and duties. This study was conducted because there is a risk posed on patient's safety if nurses are cyberloafing and if this behavior has a direct relation with procrastination and lack of conscientiousness. Aim of the study: to determine the relationship between cyberloafing, procrastination and conscientiousness among staff nurses working in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Research Design: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design with a self-reporting questionnaire was used to obtain data. Setting: The study was conducted in all inpatients units except Intensive Care Units (N=10) in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Subjects: A convenience sampling technique was used to recruit the participants of 157 (professional and technical nurses) were present and agreed to participate in the study. Instruments: The questionnaire consisted of three main scales and a demographic data sheet. The scales were namely; cyberloafing scale, procrastination scale, and conscientiousness scale. Results: There are significant correlations between cyberloafing variety and cyberloafing frequency, procrastination and conscientiousness where p= <0.001 for the three variables respectively. Regarding, cyberloafing frequency, a negative significant correlation was found with procrastination where p= <0.001 and a positive significant correlation with conscientiousness where p= 0.048. Another positive significant correlation was found between procrastination and conscientiousness in which p= <0.001. Recommendations: more extensive and in-depth research on procrastination and conscientiousness in a private sector, where there is more availability of personal computer and internet connections would be beneficial.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Nurses’ Cyberloafing and Its Relationship to Procrastination and Conscientiousness in Damanhour National Medical Institute
    AU  - Yaldez Khairy Zein El Din
    AU  - Fatma Mostafa Baddar
    Y1  - 2019/03/25
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13
    T2  - American Journal of Nursing Science
    JF  - American Journal of Nursing Science
    JO  - American Journal of Nursing Science
    SP  - 48
    EP  - 58
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5753
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20190802.13
    AB  - Cyber-loafing involves an unproductive use of time in the workplace and distracts employees from their responsibilities and duties. This study was conducted because there is a risk posed on patient's safety if nurses are cyberloafing and if this behavior has a direct relation with procrastination and lack of conscientiousness. Aim of the study: to determine the relationship between cyberloafing, procrastination and conscientiousness among staff nurses working in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Research Design: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design with a self-reporting questionnaire was used to obtain data. Setting: The study was conducted in all inpatients units except Intensive Care Units (N=10) in Damanhour National Medical Institute. Subjects: A convenience sampling technique was used to recruit the participants of 157 (professional and technical nurses) were present and agreed to participate in the study. Instruments: The questionnaire consisted of three main scales and a demographic data sheet. The scales were namely; cyberloafing scale, procrastination scale, and conscientiousness scale. Results: There are significant correlations between cyberloafing variety and cyberloafing frequency, procrastination and conscientiousness where p= <0.001 for the three variables respectively. Regarding, cyberloafing frequency, a negative significant correlation was found with procrastination where p= <0.001 and a positive significant correlation with conscientiousness where p= 0.048. Another positive significant correlation was found between procrastination and conscientiousness in which p= <0.001. Recommendations: more extensive and in-depth research on procrastination and conscientiousness in a private sector, where there is more availability of personal computer and internet connections would be beneficial.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections