Effect of Seamless Nursing for Complications on Cataract Patients
American Journal of Nursing Science
Volume 9, Issue 2, April 2020, Pages: 59-61
Received: Jan. 11, 2020; Accepted: Jan. 27, 2020; Published: Feb. 28, 2020
Views 158      Downloads 108
Authors
Junnan Lin, Department of Ophthalmology and Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Xixi Yang, Department of Ophthalmology and Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Lishi Luo, Ophthalmology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Objective: Following to Chinese cataract patients were increased in last 3 years, we evaluate the effect of seamless nursing for complications on cataract patients. Methods: 102 patients diagnosed as cataract from June 2018 to March 2019, the patients were randomly assigned to control group and intervention group, the researchers care the patients by seamless nursing and traditional nursing. We collected the information by different questionnaires which included complications, depression, anxiety and satisfaction of patients. After that, we analyze and compare the result of different groups. Result: in complications status of patient, the intervention group was much lower than that in the control group [5 (9.8%) vs 14 (27.5%)]. Additionally, the improvement had not greater gap in depression and anxiety (32.25±1.02 vs 48.52±3.66, 32.58±2.01 vs 49.56±5.84), we use the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating depression scale (SDS) to assess depression and anxiety on the patients. Conclusion: the influence of seamless nursing was better than the effect of traditional nursing, it provide better outcome of cataract treatment for the cataract patients. The seamless nursing improve the higher satisfaction score in the result, it was good for publishing of new nursing methods. But the improvement of seamless nursing was not significant in the result.
Keywords
Cataract, Nursing, Seamless Nursing
To cite this article
Junnan Lin, Xixi Yang, Lishi Luo, Effect of Seamless Nursing for Complications on Cataract Patients, American Journal of Nursing Science. Vol. 9, No. 2, 2020, pp. 59-61. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200902.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
He, M., Wang, W., Huang, W. Variations and trends in health burden of visual impairment due to cataract: a global analysis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017; 58 (10): 4299–4306.
[2]
Flaxman, S. R., Bourne, R. R. A., Resnikoff, S., Ackland, P., Braithwaite, T., Cicinelli, M. V., et al. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2017; 5 (12): e1221–e1234.
[3]
Wu Z, Meng D, Fang C, Li J, Zheng X, Lin J, Zeng H, Lv S, Zhang Z, Luan B, Zhong Z, Chen J. PITX3 mutations associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in the Chinese population. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019; 19 (4): 3123–3131.
[4]
Ram J, Singh R, Gupta R, Bhutani G, Gupta PC, Sukhija J. Toric intraocular lens implantation in children with developmental cataract and preexisting corneal astigmatism. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017; 95 (2): e95–e100.
[5]
Guerreiro M. J. S., Erfort M. V., Henssler J., et al., Increased visual cortical thickness in sight-recovery individuals, Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016; 36 (12): 5265–5274.
[6]
Yardley AM, Ali A, Najm-Tehrani N, Mireskandari K. Refractive and visual outcomes after surgery for pediatric traumatic cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018; 44 (1): 85-90.
[7]
Rao DP, John PJ, Ali MH, et al. Outcomes of lensectomy and risk factors for failure in spherophakic eyes with secondary glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018; 102 (6): 790-795.
[8]
Cumberland PM, Rahi JS. Visual function, social position, and health and life chances: the UK Biobank Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016; 134: 959-966.
[9]
White D, Leach C, Sims R, Atkinson M, Cottrell D. Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 175: 452–454.
[10]
El-Rufaie O, Absood G. Validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale among a group of Saudi patients. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 687–688.
[11]
Tan AG, Kifley A, Mitchell P, et al. Associations between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms, serum homocysteine levels, and incident cortical cataract. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134: 522-528.
[12]
Shunmoogam N, Naidoo P, Chilton R. Paraoxonase (PON)-1: a brief overview on genetics, structure, polymorphisms and clinical relevance. Vascular Health Risk Manage 2018; 14: 137.
[13]
Yu A, Lin C, Wang Q, Zheng M, Qin X. Safety of femtosecond laserassisted cataract surgery: assessment of aqueous humour and lens capsule. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016; 94 (0): 534-540.
[14]
Pascolini, D., Mariotti, S. P. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2012; 96 (5), 614-618.
[15]
Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Mutations and mechanisms in congenital and age-related cataracts. Exp Eye Res 2017; 156: 95-102.
[16]
Yang Z, Li Q, Ma X, Zhu SQ. Mutation analysis in Chinese families with autosomal dominant hereditary cataracts. Curr Eye Res 2015; 40 (12): 1225-1231.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186