Comprehension of Information for Informed Consent Among Hemato-Oncology Study Participants in Eldoret, Kenya
American Journal of Nursing Science
Volume 7, Issue 3-1, June 2018, Pages: 13-24
Received: May 24, 2017; Accepted: Aug. 1, 2017; Published: Aug. 21, 2017
Views 1745      Downloads 69
Authors
Lucy Jepkemei Chebungei, Faculty of Nursing, Kenya Medical Training College, Kabarnet, Kenya
Violet Naanyu, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
Edwin Were, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Reproductive Health, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The use of Informed consent (IC) became a prerequisite for research in response to abuses of human subjects during the last half-century, yet participant's comprehension of presented information is rarely explored. Major ethical concerns arise when information offered is not well comprehended by research participants. It is therefore a fundamental concern for all researchers to ensure that there is good comprehension of informed consent information in biomedical researches hence the current study endeavored to evaluate the comprehension of information for informed consent by Hemato- Oncology study participants. A descriptive cross sectional study design was used where systematic and convenience sampling techniques were used to sample the mothers who had assented to the study and research assistants involved in recruiting (recruiters) respectively. Two sets of semi-structured questionnaires were administered to 201 mothers and 6 recruiters, separately. Data from mothers and recruiters was collected for a period of one month and analyzed using descriptive and non- parametric correlation technique of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). The response rate was 187 (93%) and 6 (100%) for the mothers and research assistants respectively. The mean age of the mothers was 28 ± 2.24 years with most having either secondary 89 (48%) or college education 67 (36%). Their preferred language of communication was English 165 (88%) or Kiswahili 22 (12%). The mean comprehension index of IC contents by the mothers was 73.27% (Std. Dev: 28.72%). Recruiters who had more than one year experience in research used ≥ 30 min in IC process compared to ≥ 1 hour for those who had been in research for less than one year. Low comprehension levels were found among older mothers (≥ 35 years) and those with primary education, however, comprehension was higher in participants who considered the consent form to be of appropriate length 181 (97), written in an easy to understand language 173 (96) and preferably written in English 165 (88%). The level of comprehension among the mothers on IC contents was relatively high with a few recording low comprehension. Age, education level, language of transmission, length and readability of the consent form as well as recruiter experiences were all found to influence comprehension of IC information.
Keywords
Informed Consent, Comprehension, Information, Study Participants
To cite this article
Lucy Jepkemei Chebungei, Violet Naanyu, Edwin Were, Comprehension of Information for Informed Consent Among Hemato-Oncology Study Participants in Eldoret, Kenya, American Journal of Nursing Science. Special Issue:Nursing Education and Research. Vol. 7, No. 3-1, 2018, pp. 13-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.s.2018070301.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Rivera, R., Borasky, D., Rice, R., Carayon, F., and Wong, E. (2007). Informed Consent: An International Researchers’ Perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 97 (1).
[2]
Tindana, P. O., Rozmovits, L., Boulanger, R. F., Bandewar, S. V., Aborigo, R. A., Hodgson, A. V., Kolopack, P., Lavery, J. V. (2011). Aligning community engagement with traditional authority structures in global health research: a case study from northern Ghana. Am J Public Health. 2011 Oct; 101 (10): 1857-67. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300203. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
[3]
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
[4]
Vreeman, R., Kamaara, E., Kamanda, A., Ayuku, D., Nyandiko, W., Atwoli, L., Ayaya, S., Gisore, P., Scanlon, M., and Braitstein, P. (2012). A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in western Kenya. BMC Medical Ethics, 13: 23. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-23.
[5]
Silverman, H. (2011). Protecting Vulnerable Research Subjects in Critical Care Trials: Enhancing the Informed Consent Process and Recommendations for Safeguards. Annals of Intensive Care, 1 (1), 8. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-8.
[6]
Beardsley, E., Jefford, M., & Mileshkin, L. (2007). Longer Consent Forms for Clinical Trials Compromise Patient Understanding: So Why Are They Lengthening? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25 (9), e13–e14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3341.
[7]
Koay, K., Schofield, P., and Jefford, M. (2011). Importance of health literacy in oncology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 8 (1), 14–23.
[8]
Kithinji, C., & Kass, N. E. (2010). Assessing the readability of non-english-language consent forms: The case of Kiswahili for research conducted in Kenya. IRB Ethics and Human Research, 32 (4), 10-15.
[9]
Grossman, S. A., Piantadosi, S., & Covahey, C. (1994). Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12 (10), 2211–2215.
[10]
Mariner, W. K. (2003). Taking informed consent seriously in global HIV vaccine research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 32: 117–123.
[11]
Gikonyo, C., Bejon, P., Marsh, V., & Molyneux, S. (2008). Taking social relationships seriously: Lessons learned from the informed consent practices of a vaccine trial on the Kenyan Coast. Social Science & Medicine, 67 (5), 708–720.
[12]
Lavelle-Jones, C., Byrne, D., Rice, P. and Cuschieri, A. (1993). Factors affecting quality of informed consent. British Medical Journal, 306 (3): 885-90.
[13]
Mark, S. and Spiro, H. (1990). Informed consent for colonoscopy. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med., 150: 777-80.
[14]
Graham, P. (2003). Type of consent does not influence patient recall of serious potential radiation toxicity of adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Australian Radiology, 47(4): 416.
[15]
Saw, C., Wood, M., Murphy, K., Parry, R. and Hartfall, G. (1994). Informed consent: An evaluation of patients’ understanding and opinion (with respect to the operation of transurethral resection of prostate). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87 (3): 143-4.
[16]
Wadey, V. and Frank, C. (1997). The effectiveness of patient verbalization on informed consent. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 40 (2): 124-128.
[17]
World Medical Association (2013). WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved 2 – 2- 2016 from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/
[18]
Newington, L. and Metcalfe, A. (2014). Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14: 10.
[19]
Hekkenberg, J., Irish, C., Rotstein, J., et al. (1997). Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol, 26 (3): 155-9.
[20]
Cassileth, B. R., Zupkis, R. V., Sutton-Smith, K., & March, V. (1980). Informed Consent — Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized? New England Journal of Medicine, 302 (16), 896–900. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198004173021605.
[21]
Taiwo, O. O., & Kass, N. (2009). Post-consent assessment of dental subjects’ understanding of informed consent in oral health research in Nigeria. BMC medical ethics, 10, 11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-11.
[22]
Salthouse, T. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 103: 403-428.
[23]
Grady, L. and Craik, F. (2000). Changes in memory processing with age. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 10: 224-231.
[24]
Brown, S. and Park D. (2003). Theoretical models of cognitive aging and implications for translational research in medicine. Gerontologist, 43: 57-67.
[25]
Sharp SM (2009) Consent documents for oncology trials: does anybody read these things?Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road, Suite B4100, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Michael_sharp@emoryhealthcare.org.
[26]
Naanyu V, Some FF, Siika AM (2014)"I understood…but some parts were confusing and hard to grasp": Patients' perception of informed consent forms and clinical trials in Eldoret, Kenya. Perspect Clin Res., 5 (1): 20-4. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.124563.
[27]
Davis, T. C., Berkel, H. J., Holcombe, R. F., Pramanik, S., & Divers, S. G. (1998). Informed Consent for Clinical Trials: a Comparative Study of Standard versus Simplified Forms. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90 (9), 668–674. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.668.
[28]
Jefford, M., & Moore, R. (2008). Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. The lancet oncology, 9 (5), 485–493. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045 (08) 70128-1.
[29]
Tekola, F., Bull, S. J., Farsides, B., Newport, M. J., Adeyemo, A., Rotimi, C. N., & Davey, G. (2009). Tailoring Consent to Context: Designing an Appropriate Consent Process for a Biomedical Study in a Low Income Setting. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 3 (7). doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000482.
[30]
Halkoaho, A., Pietila, A. and Vahakangas, K. (2011). Ethical aspects in placental perfusion studies: views of the researchers. Placenta, 32 (7): 511-515.
[31]
Ziebland, S., Featherstone, K., Snowdon, C., Barker, K., Frost, H. and Fairbank, J. (2007). Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don’t understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons’ experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. Trials, 8: 4-10.
[32]
Malik A, Y (2011) physician-Researchers' Experiences of the Consent Process in the Sociocultural Context of a Developing Country.
[33]
Benatar JR, Mortimer J, Stretton M, Stewart RAH (2012) A Booklet on Participants’ Rights to Improve Consent for Clinical Research: A Randomized Trial. PLoS ONE 7 (10): e47023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047023.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186