International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

Genetically Modified Foods and the Probable Risks on Human Health

Received: 10 April 2015    Accepted: 28 April 2015    Published: 06 May 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Changing existing features of living beings or giving new features to them by changing the natural gene sequence through biotechnological methods is called “genetically modified organisms”, in short “GMO”. Nowadays, lots of food consumed is either totally genetically modified food or a type of food including food components produced by gene modification technology. Improving nutritive quality, extracting aminoacids as food additives and enzymes in microorganisms, increasing retention period and organeolepticquality, new planting methods, precocity, resistance against disease, stres, herbicide and viruses, better waste utilization, saving of soil, water and energy, creating new bioprocesses are the probable advantages of genetically modified organisms, whereas changes in food quality, genetic diversity threats, unfair competition between organic suppliers and traditional suppliers, noncompulsory awarness raising in some countries, food industry dominated only by a few big companies, biopiracy and consuming of natural resources by foreigners are among the probable disadvantages of genetically modified foods. Among the hesitations about GMO widely used and consumed all over the world, the most topical issue is the probable health risks caused by GMOs which are consumed as food. Through gene transfer, some features causing allergy and disease can be carried from other organism and as a consequence of this, there may be the risk of finding unexpected biochemical products in transgenic products. As uncertainities about GM foods continue, studies conducted in many countries have revealed that there are many differences among people’s information, attitude and behaviour toward this issue in various countries. Modified food is affected by factors such as education and knowledge level, risk perception, socioeconomic status, media, etc. Besides, level of income and occupation follow them. In the present compilation based on literature, it is aimed to summarize the facts related to GMO. For this reason, the probable risk factors for human health, consumer reaction, the pros and cons of GMOs stated by defining GM generally are explained in the study. With the present study aiming to reveal GM foods and their probable health risks for human, it is concluded that consumers accept the existence of biotechnologic applications but they are not familiar with these products and also consumers have great considerations about GMO produced by genetic modification and they display a negative attitude toward GM products.Consumer should be informed due to all these reasons. Media organs, therefore, have a significant role as the source of information and they will also contribute to raise awareness in society.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23
Published in International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2015)
Page(s) 356-363
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Genetically Modified Foods, Antibiotic Resistance, Allergy, Toxicity, Cancer, Human Health, Consumer Attitude

References
[1] Anonymous “Biyoguvenlik Kanunu,” 26 Mart 2010tarihli Resmi Gazete, 2010, Sayi: 27533, Turkey. http://www.resmiga zete.gov.tr/eskiler/2010/03/20100326-7.htm
[2] DPT. VIII. Bes Yillik Kalkinma Plani, Biyoteknolojive Biyoguvenlik Ozel Ihtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ulusal Molekuler Biyoloji, Modern Biyoteknolojive Biyoguvenlik Atilim Projesi Onerisi, 2000, Ankara, Turkey.
[3] Anonymous “Biyoguvenlik Kuru lKararlari,” 26 Ocak 2011 tarihli Resmi Gazete. 2011a, Sayi: 2782, Turkey. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/01/20110126-9.htm
[4] B. Karli, A. Bilgic, S. Celik, “Applying of more than one two-stage limited dependant variables on microeconomics fields: Cunsumption Sample of Genetically Modified Foods in Turkey,” 10th Econometrics and Statistics Symposium, 2009, Erzurum, Turkey.
[5] M. Arda, “Biotechnology (Some basic principles),” KUKEM Association Scientific Publications: 2, 1994, Ankara. 349. (GDO2), Turkey.
[6] M. Akcelik, “Genetically Modified Organisms and the Use in Foods,” TMMOB Food Engineers Room Books Series, 2, 2003, Ankara, Turkey.
[7] W.M. Ho, “Is it Genetic Engineering, Nightmare or Dream?”First edition, Turkey Is Bank Cultural Publications, interpreter: Cakmak, E., 1999, s. 37, Istanbul, Turkey.
[8] O. Gursoy, G. Kavas, O. Kinik, “Genetically modified products and dairy products,” Turkish Agriculture, March-April, 2003, Sayi: 150.ISSN:1303-2364, pp. 20-24. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ankara, Turkey.
[9] A. Turhan, S. Kafkas, “Detection of Genetically Modified Soybean and Maize,” C.U Journal of Science and Engineering, 2013, vol. 29-2.
[10] O. Cicekci, “Determining the knowledge and the opinions about the transgenic products (gmo) of the teacers in primary school,” unpublished Postgraduate Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences 2008, Ankara, Turkey.
[11] A. YXS Al-Babili, J. Kloti, P. Zhang, P. Lucca, I. Beyer, Potrykus, “Engineering the provitamin a (beta karoten) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm,” Science, vol. 287, 2000, pp. 303-305.
[12] V. Celik, D.T. Balik, “Genetically modified organisms (GMO),” Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology of Erciyes, 2007, 23 (1-2): 13-23.
[13] S. Kacan, “Genetic modification,” Http://www.Geocities.com/sultanhisar2000/taris./temmuz-agustos 2000.
[14] Z. Zhang, A. Xing, P. Staswick, E.T. Clemente, “The use of glufosinate as a selective agent in agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean,” Plant Cell, Tissue, Organ Culture, vol. 56, 1999, pp. 37-46.
[15] K.T. Atherton, “Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops”, Toxicology, 2002, 181-182, 421-426.
[16] A. Demir, F. Seyis, O. Kurt, “Genetically modified organisms: I. Plants,” J. of Fac. of Agric., OMU, 2006, 21(2): 249-260.
[17] A.M. Shelton, J.D. Tang, R.T. Roush, T.D. Metz, E.D. Earle, “Field tests on managingresistence to Bt-engineered plants,” Nat Biotechnol, vol. 18, 2000, pp. 339-342.
[18] D. Sarikaya, “Genetically modified organisms and biosafety,” http://www.izmircevre.Gov.tr/yayinayrinti.Asp?Div=190&did=:25./2003.
[19] M. Querci, M. Van Den Bulcke, J. Zel, G. Van Den Eede, H. Broll, “New approaches in GMO detection,” Anal BioanalChem., 2010, 396, 1991-2002.
[20] S.G. Uzogara, “The Impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st Century: A Review,” Biotechnol Adv., vol.18, 2000, pp. 179-206.
[21] S. Leimanis, M. Hernández, S. Fernández, F. Boyer, M. Burns, S. Bruderer, T. Glouden, N. Harris, O. Kaeppeli, P. Philipp, M. Pla, P. Puigdomènech, M. Vaitilingom, Y. Bertheau, J. Remacle, “A microarray-based detection system for genetically modified (GM) food ingredients,” Plant MolBiol, 2006, 61 (1): 123-139.
[22] F.E. Ahmed, Detection of GMO in foods. Trends in Biotechnology, 2002, 20 (5): 215-223.
[23] W. Sybesma, J. Hugenholtz, W.M. De Vos, E.J. Smid, “Safe use of genetically modified lactic acid bacteria in food. Bridging the Gap between consumers, green groups and industry,” Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2006, 9 (4): 424-448.
[24] Biogeves, “Determining GMO in Seeds and DNA-Protein Analysis Course,” 2009, Fransa.
[25] F. Cellini, A. Chesson, L. Colquhoun, A. Constable, H.V. Davies,K.H. Engel, A.M.R. Gatehouse, S. Karenlampi, E.J. Kok,J.J. Leguay, S. Lehesranta, H.P.J.M. Noteborn,J. Pedersen,M. Smith, “Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2004, 42, 1089-1125.
[26] S. Kefi, “Genetically Modified Organisms and the Use in Foods,” TMMOB Food Engineers Room Books Series, 2, 2003, Ankara, Turkey.
[27] S. Yanaz, “The subject of genetically modified organisms and the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol,” Foreign Trade Magazine, vol. 28, 2003, pp. 116-126.
[28] A. Gucukoglu, O. Kuplulu, “Genetically Modified Foods,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Association, 2006, 77 (2): 30-38.
[29] I.K. Vasil, “Biotechnology and food security for 21st century: A real-world Perspective,” Nat Biotechnol, vol. 16, 1998, pp.399-400.
[30] H. Yilmaz, Mad cow disease, animal products and human health,Http://www.cinetarim.com.tr/dergi/arsiv32/delidana.htm, 2000/ Access to Date: 12.12.2003.
[31] O.Ersahin, “What is ecological agriculture?”.Http://www.alternatifenerji.com/info_articles01_09.html/2002)Access to Date: 02.05.2003.
[32] Anonymous “Ecological (organic, biyological) in agriculture,” 2002, Http://www.setbir.org.tr/makale.htm / Access to Date: 02.05.2003.
[33] M. Baran, “Genetically modified organisms and biosecurity systems,” Turkish Agriculture, 2003, March-April, pp.12-15.
[34] R. Batista, B. Carmo, M. Cardoso, C. José, H.S. De Almeida, A.B. Manique, A. Bento, L. Ricardo, C.P. M.M. Oliveira, “Lack of Detectable allergenicity of transgenic maize and soya samples,” J Allergy ClinImmunol, 2005, 116 (2): 403-410.
[35] P.J. Vergragt, H.S. Brown, “Genetic engineering in agriculture: New approaches for risk management through sustainability reporting,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 75, 2008, 783-798.
[36] S.Ozdogan, Z.I. Ekmen, “What is genetic engineering?” Http://www.yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/aacorner/GEN/02/genetik.htm/2002, Access to Date: 20.12.2002.
[37] N. Batalion, “50 Harmful Effects of Genetically Modified Foods,” Americans for Safe Food, 2000, Oneonta, NY.
[38] A. Gupta, A. Mandloi, A. Nidhi, “Impact of Bt Cotton on Farmers’ Health (in Barwani and Dhar District of Madhya Pradesh),” Investigation Report, 2005, 13-16.
[39] H. Tapp, G. Stotzky, “Persistence of the insecticidal toxins from bacillus thurigiensissusp, kurstaki in soil,” Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 30, 1998, pp. 471-476.
[40] R.L. Philips, S.A. Eberhart, “Novel Methodology in Plant Breeding. In Proc,” Of the Int Crop Sci Cong Ames, USA. Crop SciSoc of America, 1993, pp. 647-648.
[41] K. Raja, “Watch dog refuses claims of rapidglobal growth in ge crops”,http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/5266c.htm/2003, Access to Date: 19.10.2011.
[42] I. Erol, “Food hygiene and Microbiology,” Pozitif Matbaacilik ISBN: 978-975-00131-0-9, 2007, pp. 331-341, Ankara, Turkey.
[43] H.O. Ince, C. Bahadiroglu, S. Toroglu, H. Bozdogan, “The Assessments on Resistance of Genetically Modified Corn against Some Insect Species,” Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University J. Inst. Sci. & Tech.2013, Cilt 2(1): 78-89.
[44] I. Haspolat, “Genetically modified organisms and biosecurity,” Veterinary journal of Ankara Univ Vet FakDerg, 2012, 59, 75-80.
[45] Y. Sayan, M. Polat, “Ecological (organic, biological) in agriculture livestock,” Turkey, 2. Ecological Farming Symposium, Narenciyeve Seracilik Arastirma Enstitusu, Antalya, 2001, pp. 95-105.
[46] Anonymous “The effect on cancer risks of genetically modified milk and milk products,” 2011b, Http://www.forum.gidagundemi.com/ Access to Date: 14.02.2011.
[47] G. Aydin, “Dioxin in feed safety,” Journal of Turkish Feed .manufacturers’ Association Feed Magazin, 2000, issue: 26: 55, Turkey.
[48] L. Lan, “Chinese public understanding of the use of agricultural biotechnology,” a case study from Zhejiang Province of China,” Lu / J Zhejiang Univ Science B, 2006, 7: 257-266.
[49] J. Februhartanty, T.N. Widyastuti, D.N. Iswarawanti, “Attitudes of agricultural scientists in indonesia towards genetically modified foods,” Asia Pac J ClinNutr, 2007, 16: 375-380.
[50] I. Christoph, M. Bruhn, J. Roosen, “Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany,” Appetite, 2008, 51; 58-68.
[51] J.W. Heffernan, V.N. Hillers, “Attitudes of consumers living in Washington regarding food biotechnology,” Journal of American Dietetic Association, 2002, 102 (1): 85-89.
[52] W.S. Chern, K.A. Rickertsen, “Comparative Analysis of Consu¬mer Acceptance of GM Foods in Norway and the USA. In Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods,” Edited by R.E. Evenson and V. Santaniello, Cabi Publishing, 2004, Cambrige, USA.
[53] O. Ozdemir, M. Duran, “Consumer Attitude towards Biotechnological Applications and Genetically Modified Organisms,” Academic Food Journal, 2010, 8 (5): 20-28.
[54] R. Pardo, C .Midden, JD. Miller, “Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union,” J Biotechnol 2002; 98: 9-24.
[55] MK. Magnusson, UKK, Hursti. “Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods,” Appetite 2002; 39: 9-24.
[56] A. Temelli, M. Kurt, “Determination of Information and Opinion of University Students about Transgenic Products (GMO),” Theoretical Pedagogy, 2011, 4 (2): 247-261.
[57] H. Tekedere, B. Taban, M. Caliskan, H. Demirtola, “Health Services Vocational School of genetically modified organisms analysis of relevant training requirements with students,” Journal of Turkish Science Education September, 2011, Issue 3, volume 8.
[58] M. Ozden, A. Akgun, A. Cinici, H. Gulmez, F. Demirtas, “Investigation of 8th Grade Student’s Knowledge of Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) and their Attitudes toward Biotechnology,” Adiyaman Univ. J. Sci. & Tech. 2013, 3 (2): 94-115.
[59] F. Adana, N. Gezer, S. Ogut, “Knowledge and opinions of the health school students about genetically modified organisms (GMOS),” AcibademUniv.Journal of Health Sciences, 2014,vol.5, Number: 4.
[60] C. Cankaya, C. FilikIscen, “Determining the knowledge and the opinions about the genetically modified organisms (gmo) of pre-service science teachers,” International Journal of Social Science. Doinumber:http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2714 Number: 32, p. 537-554, Winter III 2015.
[61] N. Kocak, T. Turker, S. Kilic, et. all. “Assessment of knowledge, attitude and behavior level of medical school students about genetically modified organisms,” Gulhane Med J. 2010, 52(3): 198-204.
[62] S. Ozturk, S. AgapinarSahin, Guducu, F. Tufekci, “The level of knowledge and attitudes of mothers to genetically modified organisms,” Izmir Dr. Behcet Uz Journal of Children's Diseases, 2014, 4 (2): 117-122. Doi: 10.5222/buchd.2014.117.
[63] K. Bilen, M. Ozel, “Gifted students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology,” Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education vol. 6, Issue 2, December 2012, 6 ( 2): 135-152.
[64] I. Ergin, TS. Gursoy, AZ. Ocek, M. Cicekoglu, “Genetically modified organisms, the Health Vocational School students on the knowledge, attitude and behavior,” TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 2008, 7(6): 503-508.
[65] V. Moses, “Biotechnology products and European consumers,” Biotechnology Advances 1999; 17: 647-678.
[66] S. Ozmert, H. Yaman, “Assessment of consumer’s attitudes and knowledge levels towards genetically modified foods,” Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 2011, 4 (1): 31-41.
[67] G. Algan Ozkok, “Consumer attitudes towards consumption of genetically modified products,” DBHAD International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Nutrition Research April 2015 Issue: 03 Volume: 02 Winter Spring. Doi: 10.17362/DBHAD.2015310319.
[68] E. Kaya, H. Gurbuz, M. Derman, “Assessment of knowledge, attitude and behavior level of medical school students about genetically modified organisms,” Gulhane Med J. 2010, 52(3): 198-204.
[69] I.H Kaya, N. Konar, N. Artik, “Urban Consumer’s Attitudes toward Genetically Modified Organisms and Foods in Turkey,” Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 20: 71-82.
[70] Maekawa F, Macer D. “How Japanese students reason about agricultural biotechnology,” SciEng Ethics 2004; 10: 705-716.
[71] Huang J, Qiu H, Bai J, Pray C. “Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China”, Appetite 2006, 46: 144-151.
[72] L. Lü, “Chinese public understanding of the use of agricultural biotechnology: a case study from Zhejiang Province of China,” Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2006, 7(4): 257–266.
Author Information
  • Vocational School of Health Sciences Child Development Program, Selcuk University, Campus, Konya, Turkey

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Gulcin Algan Ozkok. (2015). Genetically Modified Foods and the Probable Risks on Human Health. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 4(3), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Gulcin Algan Ozkok. Genetically Modified Foods and the Probable Risks on Human Health. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2015, 4(3), 356-363. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Gulcin Algan Ozkok. Genetically Modified Foods and the Probable Risks on Human Health. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2015;4(3):356-363. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23,
      author = {Gulcin Algan Ozkok},
      title = {Genetically Modified Foods and the Probable Risks on Human Health},
      journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
      volume = {4},
      number = {3},
      pages = {356-363},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20150403.23},
      abstract = {Changing existing features of living beings or giving new features to them by changing the natural gene sequence through biotechnological methods is called “genetically modified organisms”, in short “GMO”. Nowadays, lots of food consumed is either totally genetically modified food or a type of food including food components produced by gene modification technology. Improving nutritive quality, extracting aminoacids as food additives and enzymes in microorganisms, increasing retention period and organeolepticquality, new planting methods, precocity, resistance against disease, stres, herbicide and viruses, better waste utilization, saving of soil, water and energy, creating new bioprocesses are the probable advantages of genetically modified organisms, whereas changes in food quality, genetic diversity threats, unfair competition between organic suppliers and traditional suppliers, noncompulsory awarness raising in some countries, food industry dominated only by a few big companies, biopiracy and consuming of natural resources by foreigners are among the probable disadvantages of genetically modified foods. Among the hesitations about GMO widely used and consumed all over the world, the most topical issue is the probable health risks caused by GMOs which are consumed as food. Through gene transfer, some features causing allergy and disease can be carried from other organism and as a consequence of this, there may be the risk of finding unexpected biochemical products in transgenic products. As uncertainities about GM foods continue, studies conducted in many countries have revealed that there are many differences among people’s information, attitude and behaviour toward this issue in various countries. Modified food is affected by factors such as education and knowledge level, risk perception, socioeconomic status, media, etc. Besides, level of income and occupation follow them. In the present compilation based on literature, it is aimed to summarize the facts related to GMO. For this reason, the probable risk factors for human health, consumer reaction, the pros and cons of GMOs stated by defining GM generally are explained in the study. With the present study aiming to reveal GM foods and their probable health risks for human, it is concluded that consumers accept the existence of biotechnologic applications but they are not familiar with these products and also consumers have great considerations about GMO produced by genetic modification and they display a negative attitude toward GM products.Consumer should be informed due to all these reasons. Media organs, therefore, have a significant role as the source of information and they will also contribute to raise awareness in society.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Genetically Modified Foods and the Probable Risks on Human Health
    AU  - Gulcin Algan Ozkok
    Y1  - 2015/05/06
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23
    T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
    SP  - 356
    EP  - 363
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2327-2716
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150403.23
    AB  - Changing existing features of living beings or giving new features to them by changing the natural gene sequence through biotechnological methods is called “genetically modified organisms”, in short “GMO”. Nowadays, lots of food consumed is either totally genetically modified food or a type of food including food components produced by gene modification technology. Improving nutritive quality, extracting aminoacids as food additives and enzymes in microorganisms, increasing retention period and organeolepticquality, new planting methods, precocity, resistance against disease, stres, herbicide and viruses, better waste utilization, saving of soil, water and energy, creating new bioprocesses are the probable advantages of genetically modified organisms, whereas changes in food quality, genetic diversity threats, unfair competition between organic suppliers and traditional suppliers, noncompulsory awarness raising in some countries, food industry dominated only by a few big companies, biopiracy and consuming of natural resources by foreigners are among the probable disadvantages of genetically modified foods. Among the hesitations about GMO widely used and consumed all over the world, the most topical issue is the probable health risks caused by GMOs which are consumed as food. Through gene transfer, some features causing allergy and disease can be carried from other organism and as a consequence of this, there may be the risk of finding unexpected biochemical products in transgenic products. As uncertainities about GM foods continue, studies conducted in many countries have revealed that there are many differences among people’s information, attitude and behaviour toward this issue in various countries. Modified food is affected by factors such as education and knowledge level, risk perception, socioeconomic status, media, etc. Besides, level of income and occupation follow them. In the present compilation based on literature, it is aimed to summarize the facts related to GMO. For this reason, the probable risk factors for human health, consumer reaction, the pros and cons of GMOs stated by defining GM generally are explained in the study. With the present study aiming to reveal GM foods and their probable health risks for human, it is concluded that consumers accept the existence of biotechnologic applications but they are not familiar with these products and also consumers have great considerations about GMO produced by genetic modification and they display a negative attitude toward GM products.Consumer should be informed due to all these reasons. Media organs, therefore, have a significant role as the source of information and they will also contribute to raise awareness in society.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections