Influence of Postharvest Treatment on Physical Characteristics and Mineral Content of Mango (Mangifera Indica L) Fruit in Arba Minch, Southern Ethiopia
International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
Volume 5, Issue 6, November 2016, Pages: 395-400
Received: Aug. 22, 2016;
Accepted: Sep. 1, 2016;
Published: Nov. 3, 2016
Views 2568 Downloads 96
Gizachew Girma, Department of Horticulture, College of Agricultural Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
Gezahegn Garo, Department of Horticulture, College of Agricultural Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
Seifu Fetena, Department of Horticulture, College of Agricultural Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
The trial was carried out to explore the influence of packaging material and storage period on physical characteristics and mineral content of mango fruit at cool chamber and open air.The experimental treatments were comprised storage conditions (open air and pusa zero energy cool chamber), packaging materials (plastic and wooden crate) and storage periods (0, 3, 6, 9 & 12 days) which were arranged in Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with three replications. Highly significant effect of storage temperature, packages and storage period on weight loss, soft rot and firmness of mango fruit were observed during storage at probability level of (p<0.05) while Ca and Mg content of fruit were not affected significantly. Maximum weight loss (33.24%) and soft rot percent (100%) of mango fruit were observed at open air for 9th day of storage, except firmness (6.10) was obtained at cool chamber during harvested day. Whereas the minimum weight loss (3.74%), soft rot percent (1.11%) and firmness (0.52N) of mango fruit were observed at cool chamber for lowest day of storage. It can be concluded that, the results of physiological weight loss and soft rot incidence were increased significantly as increased storage period at the entire observation whereas firmness, calcium and magnesium content of fruit were decreased as increased storage periods. Mango fruits stored in pusa zero energy cool chamber was exhibited lower weight loss and soft rot incidence while firmness, Ca and Mg contents were exhibited higher as compared to open air storage condition. Based on the present study the combinations of cool chamber + plastic crate + storage up to 12th days were recommended for mango fruit under Arba Minch condition.
Influence of Postharvest Treatment on Physical Characteristics and Mineral Content of Mango (Mangifera Indica L) Fruit in Arba Minch, Southern Ethiopia, International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences.
Vol. 5, No. 6,
2016, pp. 395-400.
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
FAO, 2011. Tropical fruits compendium. http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/022/am481t.pdf.
Narayana, C. K., R. K. Pal and S. K. Roy. 1996. Effect of pre-storage treatments and temperature regimes on shelf-life and respiratory behaviour of ripe Baneshan mango. J. Food Sci. Tech., 33: 79-82.
Carrillo, L. A., F. Ramirez-Bustamante, J. B. Valdez-Torres, R. Rojas-Villegas and E.M. Yahia. 2000. Ripening and quality changes in mango fruit as affected by coating with an edible film. J. Food Qlty., 23: 479-486.
Gomer-Lim, M. A. 1997. Post harvest physiology. In: The Mango: Botany, Production and Uses. (Es.): R. E. Litz. pp. 425-446, CAB International, New York.
Herianus, J. D., L. Z. Singh and S. C. Tan. 2003. Aroma volatiles production during fruit ripening of Kensington Pride mango. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 27: 323-336.
ICAR Newsletter, 3, 1–4 (1997).
Tahir FM, Pervaz MA, Hameed C (2002). Losses of mango fruit after harvest and its control. Agric. Digest. 37: 62-64.
Woreda Burea of Agriculture and Rural Development. 2009. “Survey Report on Production of mango”. Unpublished: Arbaminch, Ethiopia.
Moneruzzaman KM, Hossain ABMS, Sani W, Saifuddin M, Alenazi M (2009) Effect of harvesting and storage conditions on the post harvest quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) cv. Roma VF. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 3: 113-121.
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Ronald, S. K. and Ronald, S. 1991. Pearson’s Composition and Analysis of Foods, 9th edn., p. 8-42. England: Addision Wesley Longman Ltd.
Chaturvedi, U. C., Shrivastava, R. and Upreti, R. K. 2004. Viral infections and trace elements: A complex interaction. A review article. Current Science 87(11): 1536-1554.
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984).Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research.2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.pp. 680.
Veravrbeke, E. A., P. Verboven, P. Oostveldt and B. M. Nicolai (2003). Predication of moisture loss across the cuticle of apple (Malussylvestrissupsp. Mitis(Wallr.) during storage: part 2. Model simulations and practical applications. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30: 89-97.
Weichmann, J., 1987. Post Harvest Physiology of Vegetables. Marcel Bekker, Inc, New York, P: 145.
Opara, L. U., H. X. Nguyen and Levanto, 2000. Postharvest technology for Vietnamese Buoi mango. Quality assurance in agricultural produce. ACIAR proceedings, 100: 633-638.
Spotts, R. et al, 1999.Variability in postharvest decay among apple cultivars. Plant Dis. 83: 1051-1054.
Aremu CY and Udoessien EI, 1990. Chemical estimation of some inorganic elements in selected tropical fruits and vegetables.Food Chem. 37: 229-234.
Hunt CD, Shuller TR, Mullen ML, 1991.Concentration of boron and other elements in human foods and personal-care products. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 91: 558-568.