Extending the Shelf Life of Camembert Cheese via Controlling Over-Ripening by Bacteriocin of Newly Lactic Acid Bacterial Isolate LAB100
International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
Volume 6, Issue 2, March 2017, Pages: 88-98
Received: Jan. 28, 2017; Accepted: Feb. 13, 2017; Published: Feb. 27, 2017
Views 3024      Downloads 112
Authors
Manal Khider, Department of Dairy Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
Khaled Elbanna, Deptartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt; Department of Biology, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Camembert cheese is a surface white mould ripened cheese; when full ripe the casein becomes liquefy as the intensive degradation occurs by proteinases from surface flora and results over-ripening and off flavor. To control this, partial purified bacteriocin like substances (PPBLS) from newly lactic acid bacterial isolate (LAB100) exhibited antifungal activity against Penicillium candidum (in vitro) were used. Inhibition (%) of P. candidum by PPBLS at concentrations of 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 mg/ml was 34, 50, 79, 80 and 85%, respectively. Based on their superior antifungal potential activity; isolate LAB100 was phenotypically and genotypically characterized as newly Lactobacillus sp. For delaying the Camembert cheese over-ripening (in vivo), bacteriocin producing isolate LAB100 and its PPBLS were incorporated and applied in different camembert cheese treatments. Three treatments beside control were conducted; after brining all cheese treatments stored at 12±2°C to ripen for 12 days and then at 5±2°C for more 30 days to complete ripening. Organoleptic properties, pH values and nitrogen distribution were determined during ripening period. In addition, the proteolysis of treated Camembert cheese was monitored by gel electrophoresis. The cheese treatment (T2) made with bacteriocin producer isolate LAB 100 added as co-culture to main starter recorded the highest total score, followed by T3 and the lowest one was recorded for control (T1). The highest WSN/TN% was in T1; 5.4, 22.87, 34.41 and 57.65% at 3, 10, 20, and 40 days after brining, respectively, while the lowest WSN/TN% was recorded for treatment that made with both bacteriocin producer strain LAB100 and sprayed by PPBLS solution after 3 days of brining (T3), where it was 5.05, 9.85, 13.82, and 31.74% at the same previous ages, respectively. These results were confirmed by gel electrophoresis, indicating that bacteriocin producer LAB100 and or its bacteriocin controlled the protein degradation. These results suggest that both bacteriocin producer strain and its PPBLS minimize the growth of P. candidum as a consequence the rate of proteolysis was controlled and hence extending the shelf life of Camembert cheese is occurred.
Keywords
Control Camembert Cheese Over-Ripening, Surface Mould Ripened Cheese, Proteolysis Control, Penicillium candidum, Bacteriocin Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria, Antifungal
To cite this article
Manal Khider, Khaled Elbanna, Extending the Shelf Life of Camembert Cheese via Controlling Over-Ripening by Bacteriocin of Newly Lactic Acid Bacterial Isolate LAB100, International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. Vol. 6, No. 2, 2017, pp. 88-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170602.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
M. J. Sousa, P. L. H. McSweeney. Studies on the ripening of Cooleeney, and Irish farmhouse Camembert cheese, Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research. 2001, 40, 83-05.
[2]
C. J. Coker, R. A. Crawford, K. A. Johanston, H. Singh, L. K. Creamer. Towards classification of cheese variety and maturity of the basis of statistical analysis of proteolysis data-a review. 2005, International Dairy Journal, 15: 631-643.
[3]
McSweeney, P. H. (2004). Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 57 (2/3): 127-144.
[4]
M. B. Shaw. Modern cheese making: soft cheese, in: Modern Dairy Technology. Advances in Milk Products. Vol. 2, 2nd edn., R. K. Robinson, ed., Elsevier Applied Science Publishing, London. 1993, pp 221-281.
[5]
S. Swan, 2011. Methods to control the manufacture of soft mould ripened cheese. M. Sc, Thesis, Food Technology, Massey University.
[6]
K. D. Antoniou, D. Petridis, S. Raphaelides, Z. Ben Omar, R. Kesteloot. Textural assessment of French cheese. Journal of Food Science. 2000, 65 (1): 168-172.
[7]
P. F. Fox, T. P. Guinee, T. M. Cogan, P. L. H. McSweeney. Fundamentals of cheese science. 2000, Aspen Publications, Inc. United States of America.
[8]
M. J. Sousa, Y. Ardo, P. L. H. McSweeney. Advances in the study of proteolysis during cheese ripening. International Dairy Journal. 2001a, 11: 327–345.
[9]
M. J. Sousa, Y. Ardo, P. L. H. McSweeney. Studies on the ripening of cooleeney and Irish farmhouse camembert-type cheese. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 2001b, 40, 83-95.
[10]
P. Kolakowski, A. Reps, A. Babuchowski. Characteristics of pressurized ripened cheese. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 1998, 7/48 (3), 473-482.
[11]
S. Desorby, J. Hardy. Camembert cheese water loss through absorbent packaging, Journal of Food Science. 1994, 59 (5) 986-989.
[12]
B. Roger, S. Desorby, J. Hardy. Respiration of Penicillium camemberti during ripening and cold storage of semi-soft cheese. 1998, Le Lait, 78, 241-250.
[13]
S. Westall, O. Filtenborg. Spoilage yeasts of decorated soft cheese packed in modified atmosphere. Food Microbiology. 1998, 15, 243-249.
[14]
S. J. Walker, G. Betts. Chilled food microbiology. In: Stringer, M., Dennis, C. (Ed.). Chilled foods; a comprehensive guide: 2nd edn. Woohhead Publishing Limited. England. 2000, Pp: 153.
[15]
W. H. Holzapfel, P. Haberer, R. Geisen, J. Björkroth, U. Schillinger. Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 365S-373S.
[16]
H. Khan, S. Flint, PL. Yu. Enterocins in food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010, 141: 1-10.
[17]
P. D. Cotter, C. Hill, R. P. Ross. Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 777-788.
[18]
P. D. Cotter, R. P. Ross, C. Hill. Bacteriocins—aviable alternative to antibiotics? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 95–105.
[19]
L. Deegan, P. Cotter, C. Hill, P. Ross. Bacteriocins: Biological tools for bio-preservation and shelf-life extension. International Dairy Journal. 2006, 16: 1058–1071.
[20]
L. O’Sullivan, R. P. Ross, C. Hill. Review: Potential of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria for improvements in food safety and quality. Biochimie. 2002, 84, 593-604.
[21]
S. C. Yang, C. H. Lin, C. T. Sung, J. Y. Fang. Antibacterial activities of bacteriocins: application in foods and pharmaceuticals. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014, 5: 1-10.
[22]
J. De Man, M. Rogosa, E. Sharpe (1960). A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23, 130–135.
[23]
J. G. Holt, N. R. Krieg, P. H. A. Sneath, J. T. Staley, S. T. Williams. 1994, Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th edn. Williams and Wilkins.
[24]
K. Elbanna, G. Hassan, M. Khider, R. Mandour. Safe Biodegradation of Textile Azo Dyes by Newly Isolated Lactic Acid Bacteria and Detection of Plasmids Associated With Degradation. J Bioremed and Biodeg. 2010, 1: 1-6.
[25]
R. D. Page. Tree View: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers, Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1996, 12: 357-358.
[26]
O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosenbrough, A. I. Farr R. J. Randall. Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193: 265-271.
[27]
J. Galloway. Production of soft cheese. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology. 1995, 48, 36-43.
[28]
SPSS. Statistical Package for Social Sciences. SPSS Inc., 1999, 444, North Michigen Avenue, Chicago, IL 606 11, USA.
[29]
D. B. Duncan. Multiple range and Multiple F test. Biometr. 1955, 11: 1 42.
[30]
A. T. Andrews. Proteinases in normal bovine milk and their action on caseins. J Dairy Res. 1983, 50, 45-55.
[31]
R. W. Blaksley, J. A. Boezi. A new staining technique for proteins in polyacrylamide gels using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G250. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 82, 580-582.
[32]
AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th edn., AOAC International, Gaitherburg, MD, USA, Official Methods 920.124, 926.08, 995.30, 20001.14. Washington, DC, USA.
[33]
P Peláez, M Fresno, C Días and J Darias. Caracterización físico-química de quesos frescos elaborados con leche de cabra en la isla de Tenerife. Ciencia y Tecnología Alimentaria, 2003, 4 (2): 103-108.
[34]
T. R. Marshall. Standard methods for the examination of dairy products, 16th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, U. S. A, 1992, pp 433-531.
[35]
S. R. Tatini and K. L. Kauppi. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. In: Roginski H, Fuquay JW and Fox PF (eds.) Vol. 1. Academic Press and Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Boston, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo. 2003, pp. 74-79.
[36]
G. Klein, A. Pack, C. Bonaparte, G. Reuter Taxonomy and physiology of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. International Journal Food Microbiology. 1998, 41: 103– 125.
[37]
R. R. Colwell, R. A. Clayton, B. A. Ortiz-Conde, D. Jacobs, E. Russek-Cohen. The microbial species concept and biodiversity. In: Microbial Diversity and Ecosystem Function, eds Allsopp, D., Colwell, R. and Hawksworth, L. 1995, pp. 3-15. Wallingford, UK.
[38]
L. De Vuyst, E. J Vandamme. Nisin, a lantibiotic produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis: Properties, biosynthesis, fermentation and applications. 1994, In Bacteriocins of Lactic acid bacteria. Eds De Vuyst, L., E. J. Vandamme. Blackie Academic & Professional, Chapman & Hall. London, Great Britain.
[39]
P. Lavermicocca, F. Valerio, A. Evidente, S. Lazzaroni, A. Corsetti, M. Gobbetti. Purification and characterization of novel antifungal compounds from the sourdough Lactobacillus plantarumstrain 21B. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66: 4084–4090.
[40]
J. Schnürer, M. J. Agnusson. Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16: 70 – 78.
[41]
M. Dalmau, E. Maier, N. Mulet, M. Viñas, R. Benz. 2002, Bacterial membrane injuries induced by lactacin F and nisin. Int. Microbiol. 5: 73–80.
[42]
T. J. Montville, K. Winkowski, R. D. Ludescher. Models and mechanisms for bacteriocin action and application. Inter. Dairy Journal. 1995, 5: 797–814.
[43]
F. C. Odds, A. J. P. Brown, Gow, N. A. R. Antifungal agents: mechanisms of action. Trends in Microbiology. 2003, 11, 272-279.
[44]
M. Khider. 1995, Proteolysis in Camembert cheese. M. Sc. Thesis, Department of Food Chemistry, University College Cork, Ireland.
[45]
K. Katoka, K. Nukada, T. Miyamoto, T. Nakae. Changes in hardness and protein degradation during camembert cheese ripening. Jap. J. Zootech. Sci. 1987, 58, 356-358; cited from Dairy Sci., Abstr., 1988, 50, no. 1545.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186