Simple choice auditory reaction time plays a vital role in daily life including sports. The balanced reaction of both sides of the human helps in achieving the highest movement output. The purpose of the study is to compare simple reaction time between university sports and sedentary female students based on preferred and non-preferred hand. Subjects were selected from Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh. They were bachelor and master students and were between 19-26 years old. There were 20 students in each group of sports and sedentary female students. Data was collected using the AVR machine. An average of 5 trials was calculated as the time score in millisecond. The result shows that in simple choice auditory reaction time of hands between sports and sedentary female students in the preferred hand, sport female mean = 18.25 ms and SD = 2.07 ms and sedentary female students’ mean = 20.45 ms and SD = 1.67 ms with t(0.05)(38)= -3.695 and p = 0.001.On the other hand, in the non-preferred hand Sport female mean = 20.20 ms and SD = 1.80 ms, and Sedentary female mean = 21.70 ms and SD = 0.98 ms with t(0.05)(38) = -3.382 and p= 0.002. Moreover, in the simple choice auditory reaction time between the preferred and non-preferred hand of sports and sedentary female players’ preferred hand mean = 19.35 ms and SD = 2.167 ms, and non-preferred hand mean = 20.35 ms and SD = 1.616 ms, t(0.05)(39) = -5.639 and p= 0.00. So it is concluded that University sports female students are superior to sedentary female students in simple choice auditory reaction time in both the hands. Further, University female students’ preferred hand is faster in simple choice auditory reaction time than that of non-preferred hand.
| Published in | American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 7, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14 |
| Page(s) | 155-158 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Simple Choice Auditory Reaction Time, Preferred Hand, Non-Preferred Hand
| [1] | Definition of reaction time | Dictionary.com, Www.dictionary.com. (n.d.). https://www.dictionary.com/browse/reaction-time (accessed September 10, 2019). |
| [2] | Collins, Reaction time definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary, (n.d.). https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/reaction-time (accessed September 10, 2019). |
| [3] | I. J. Deary, D. Liewald, J. Nissan, A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task, Behav. Res. Methods. 43 (2011) 258–268. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0024-1. |
| [4] | M. Kennefick, A. D. Wright, J. D. Smirl, P. van Donkelaar, Anticipatory postural adjustments as a function of response complexity in simple reaction time tasks, Neurosci. Lett. 684 (2018) 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.06.058. |
| [5] | D. Maslovat, S. T. Klapp, C. J. Forgaard, R. Chua, I. M. Franks, The effect of response complexity on simple reaction time occurs even with a highly predictable imperative stimulus, Neurosci. Lett. 704 (2019) 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.03.056. |
| [6] | Madanmohan, A. B. Bhavanani, G. Dayanidy, Z. Sanjay, I. V. Basavaraddi, Effect of yoga therapy on reaction time, biochemical parameters and wellness score of peri and post-menopausal diabetic patients, Int. J. Yoga. 5 (2012) 10–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.91696. |
| [7] | A. M. Chandra, S. Ghosh, S. Barman, R. Iqbal, N. Sadhu, Effect of Exercise and Heat-Load on Simple Rea Time of University Students, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 16 (2010) 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2010.11076862. |
| [8] | M. T. G. Pain, A. Hibbs, Sprint starts and the minimum auditory reaction time, J. Sports Sci. 25 (2007) 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600718004. |
| [9] | S. Jose, P. K. Gideon, Comparison between Auditory and Visual Simple Reaction Times, Neurosci. Med. (2010). https://doi.org/doi:10.4236/nm.2010.11004. |
| [10] | Z. Pancar, M. Özdal, S. Pancar, M. Biçer, INVESTIGATION OF VISUAL AND AUDITORY SIMPLE REACTION TIME OF 11-18 AGED YOUTH, Eur. J. Phys. Educ. Sport Sci. 0 (2016). https://www.oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejep/article/view/313 (accessed September 10, 2019). |
| [11] | D. L. Woods, J. M. Wyma, E. W. Yund, T. J. Herron, B. Reed, Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131. |
| [12] | M. GARG, H. LATA, L. WALIA, O. GOYAL, EFFECTOFAEROBICEXERCISEONAUDITORYANDVISUALREACTIONTIMES: APROSPECTIVESTUDY, Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. (2013). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/809e/02b8929c56dc82e00bbe71f366165723be60.pdf. |
| [13] | M. Debeljak, G. Vidmar, K. Oberstar, A. Zupan, Simple and choice reaction times of healthy adults and patients after stroke during simulated driving, Int. J. Rehabil. Res. (2019) 280. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000351. |
| [14] | Z. ARI, N. KUTLU, B. S. UYANIK, F. TANELI, G. BUYUKYAZI, T. TAVLI, SERUM TESTOSTERONE, GROWTH HORMONE, AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-1 LEVELS, MENTAL REACTION TIME, AND MAXIMAL AEROBIC EXERCISE IN SEDENTARY AND LONG-TERM PHYSICALLY TRAINED ELDERLY MALES: International Journal of Neuroscience: Vol 114, No 5, Int. J. Neurosci. 114 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450490430499. |
| [15] | R. Nakamura, R. Taniguchi, Y. Oshima, Preferred Hand and Steadiness of Reaction Time, Percept. Mot. Skills. 42 (1976) 983–988. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1976.42.3.983. |
| [16] | S. DANE, A. ERZURUMLUOGLU, SEX AND HANDEDNESS DIFFERENCES IN EYE-HAND VISUAL REACTION TIMES IN HANDBALL PLAYERS, Int. J. Neurosci. 113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450390220367. |
APA Style
Mohammad Nasim Reza, Shaybal Chanda. (2019). Comparative Study of Simple Choice Auditory Reaction Time of University Sports and Sedentary Female Students. American Journal of Sports Science, 7(4), 155-158. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14
ACS Style
Mohammad Nasim Reza; Shaybal Chanda. Comparative Study of Simple Choice Auditory Reaction Time of University Sports and Sedentary Female Students. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2019, 7(4), 155-158. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14
AMA Style
Mohammad Nasim Reza, Shaybal Chanda. Comparative Study of Simple Choice Auditory Reaction Time of University Sports and Sedentary Female Students. Am J Sports Sci. 2019;7(4):155-158. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14,
author = {Mohammad Nasim Reza and Shaybal Chanda},
title = {Comparative Study of Simple Choice Auditory Reaction Time of University Sports and Sedentary Female Students},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
volume = {7},
number = {4},
pages = {155-158},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20190704.14},
abstract = {Simple choice auditory reaction time plays a vital role in daily life including sports. The balanced reaction of both sides of the human helps in achieving the highest movement output. The purpose of the study is to compare simple reaction time between university sports and sedentary female students based on preferred and non-preferred hand. Subjects were selected from Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh. They were bachelor and master students and were between 19-26 years old. There were 20 students in each group of sports and sedentary female students. Data was collected using the AVR machine. An average of 5 trials was calculated as the time score in millisecond. The result shows that in simple choice auditory reaction time of hands between sports and sedentary female students in the preferred hand, sport female mean = 18.25 ms and SD = 2.07 ms and sedentary female students’ mean = 20.45 ms and SD = 1.67 ms with t(0.05)(38)= -3.695 and p = 0.001.On the other hand, in the non-preferred hand Sport female mean = 20.20 ms and SD = 1.80 ms, and Sedentary female mean = 21.70 ms and SD = 0.98 ms with t(0.05)(38) = -3.382 and p= 0.002. Moreover, in the simple choice auditory reaction time between the preferred and non-preferred hand of sports and sedentary female players’ preferred hand mean = 19.35 ms and SD = 2.167 ms, and non-preferred hand mean = 20.35 ms and SD = 1.616 ms, t(0.05)(39) = -5.639 and p= 0.00. So it is concluded that University sports female students are superior to sedentary female students in simple choice auditory reaction time in both the hands. Further, University female students’ preferred hand is faster in simple choice auditory reaction time than that of non-preferred hand.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Study of Simple Choice Auditory Reaction Time of University Sports and Sedentary Female Students AU - Mohammad Nasim Reza AU - Shaybal Chanda Y1 - 2019/11/05 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14 T2 - American Journal of Sports Science JF - American Journal of Sports Science JO - American Journal of Sports Science SP - 155 EP - 158 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8540 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190704.14 AB - Simple choice auditory reaction time plays a vital role in daily life including sports. The balanced reaction of both sides of the human helps in achieving the highest movement output. The purpose of the study is to compare simple reaction time between university sports and sedentary female students based on preferred and non-preferred hand. Subjects were selected from Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh. They were bachelor and master students and were between 19-26 years old. There were 20 students in each group of sports and sedentary female students. Data was collected using the AVR machine. An average of 5 trials was calculated as the time score in millisecond. The result shows that in simple choice auditory reaction time of hands between sports and sedentary female students in the preferred hand, sport female mean = 18.25 ms and SD = 2.07 ms and sedentary female students’ mean = 20.45 ms and SD = 1.67 ms with t(0.05)(38)= -3.695 and p = 0.001.On the other hand, in the non-preferred hand Sport female mean = 20.20 ms and SD = 1.80 ms, and Sedentary female mean = 21.70 ms and SD = 0.98 ms with t(0.05)(38) = -3.382 and p= 0.002. Moreover, in the simple choice auditory reaction time between the preferred and non-preferred hand of sports and sedentary female players’ preferred hand mean = 19.35 ms and SD = 2.167 ms, and non-preferred hand mean = 20.35 ms and SD = 1.616 ms, t(0.05)(39) = -5.639 and p= 0.00. So it is concluded that University sports female students are superior to sedentary female students in simple choice auditory reaction time in both the hands. Further, University female students’ preferred hand is faster in simple choice auditory reaction time than that of non-preferred hand. VL - 7 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: