International Journal of Medical Imaging

| Peer-Reviewed |

Accuracy of Ultrasonographically Measured Placental Thickness in Third Trimester for Estimation of Gestational Age: A Cross Sectional Study Among Indian Population

Received: 13 January 2017    Accepted: 27 February 2017    Published: 15 March 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Exact determination of gestational age is of great clinical importance to the Obstetricians, dilemma remains in those women having unreliable LMP or having no early dating scans. A cross sectional study was done on 202 antenatal women in the third trimester (29 - 40 weeks), to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographically measured placental thickness in the third trimester for the estimation of gestational age in normal singleton pregnancies. It was found that Placental thickness gradually increased and corresponded with period of gestation from 29 to 38 weeks and then either it was constant or 1-2 mm lower than the period of gestation. Placental thickness is an effective ultrasonographic parameter for estimation of gestational age.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12
Published in International Journal of Medical Imaging (Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2017)
Page(s) 5-8
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Placental Thickness, Gestational Age, Ultrasonographic Parameter

References
[1] Mital P, Hooja N, Mehndiratta K. Placental thickness: a sonographic parameter for estimating gestational age of the fetus. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2002; 12 (4): 553–4.
[2] Jain A, Kumar G, Agarwal U. Placental thickness: a sonographic indicator of gestational age. J ObstetGynaecol India 2001; 51 (3): 48–9.
[3] Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Embryogenesis and fetal morphological development. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, editors. Williams Obstetrics, 24th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2014. p. 127-155.
[4] Mathai BM, Singla SC, Nittala PP, Chakravarti RJ, Toppo JN. Placental thickness: its correlation with ultrasonographic gestational age in normal and intrauterine growth-retarded pregnancies in the late second and third trimester. J ObstetGynaecol India 2013; 63 (4): 230-3.
[5] Rumack CM, Wilson SK, Charboneau JN. In fetal measurements—normal and abnormal fetal growth, diagnostic ultrasound—obstetric and fetal sonography. 3rd ed. St. Louis: ElsevierMosby; 2005. p. 1499–500.
[6] Ohagwu CC, Abu PO, Ezeokeke UO, Ugwu AC. Relationship between placental thickness and growth parameters in normal Nigerian foetuses. Afr J Biotechnol 2009; 8 (2): 133–8.
[7] Karthikeyan T, Subramaniam RK, Johnson W, Prabhu K. Placental thickness & its correlation to gestational age &foetal growth parameters- a cross sectional ultrasonographic study. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 6 (10): 1732-5.
[8] Abu PO, Ohagwu CC, Eze JC, et al. Correlation between placental thickness and estimated fetal weight in Nigerian women. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci. 2009; 1 (3): 80–5.
[9] Damodaram M, Story L, Eixrach E. Placental MRI in intrauterine fetal growth restriction. Placenta. 2010; 31 (6): 91–498.
[10] Habib FA. Prediction of low birth weight infants from ultrasound measurement of placental diameter and placental thickness. Ann Saudi Med. 2002; 22 (5-6): 312-14.
[11] Anna J. Lee, MBBS, FRANZCOG et al. Placental Thickness in the Second Trimester; A Pilot Study to Determine the Normal Range, JUM., 31 (2), (2012), 213-218.
[12] Mahmoud S. Babiker, Rana A Eisa Placenta Thickness Measurements during Gestational Age Progress. Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, 2014, 31-37 ISSN: 2241-2328 (print version), 2241-2336 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2014.
Author Information
  • Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru TegBahadur Hospital, Delhi, India

  • Department of Radiology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru TegBahadur Hospital, Delhi, India

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Richa Sharma, Natasha Gupta. (2017). Accuracy of Ultrasonographically Measured Placental Thickness in Third Trimester for Estimation of Gestational Age: A Cross Sectional Study Among Indian Population. International Journal of Medical Imaging, 5(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Richa Sharma; Natasha Gupta. Accuracy of Ultrasonographically Measured Placental Thickness in Third Trimester for Estimation of Gestational Age: A Cross Sectional Study Among Indian Population. Int. J. Med. Imaging 2017, 5(1), 5-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Richa Sharma, Natasha Gupta. Accuracy of Ultrasonographically Measured Placental Thickness in Third Trimester for Estimation of Gestational Age: A Cross Sectional Study Among Indian Population. Int J Med Imaging. 2017;5(1):5-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12,
      author = {Richa Sharma and Natasha Gupta},
      title = {Accuracy of Ultrasonographically Measured Placental Thickness in Third Trimester for Estimation of Gestational Age: A Cross Sectional Study Among Indian Population},
      journal = {International Journal of Medical Imaging},
      volume = {5},
      number = {1},
      pages = {5-8},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmi.20170501.12},
      abstract = {Exact determination of gestational age is of great clinical importance to the Obstetricians, dilemma remains in those women having unreliable LMP or having no early dating scans. A cross sectional study was done on 202 antenatal women in the third trimester (29 - 40 weeks), to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographically measured placental thickness in the third trimester for the estimation of gestational age in normal singleton pregnancies. It was found that Placental thickness gradually increased and corresponded with period of gestation from 29 to 38 weeks and then either it was constant or 1-2 mm lower than the period of gestation. Placental thickness is an effective ultrasonographic parameter for estimation of gestational age.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Accuracy of Ultrasonographically Measured Placental Thickness in Third Trimester for Estimation of Gestational Age: A Cross Sectional Study Among Indian Population
    AU  - Richa Sharma
    AU  - Natasha Gupta
    Y1  - 2017/03/15
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12
    T2  - International Journal of Medical Imaging
    JF  - International Journal of Medical Imaging
    JO  - International Journal of Medical Imaging
    SP  - 5
    EP  - 8
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-832X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20170501.12
    AB  - Exact determination of gestational age is of great clinical importance to the Obstetricians, dilemma remains in those women having unreliable LMP or having no early dating scans. A cross sectional study was done on 202 antenatal women in the third trimester (29 - 40 weeks), to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographically measured placental thickness in the third trimester for the estimation of gestational age in normal singleton pregnancies. It was found that Placental thickness gradually increased and corresponded with period of gestation from 29 to 38 weeks and then either it was constant or 1-2 mm lower than the period of gestation. Placental thickness is an effective ultrasonographic parameter for estimation of gestational age.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections