| Peer-Reviewed

Manual Liquid Based Cytology in Diagnosis of Gynecologic Pathology

Received: 18 February 2016    Accepted: 21 March 2016    Published: 13 June 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a commonly encountered complaint in gynecology department. Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in women and the most frequent gynecological cancer in developed countries. With 5,28, 000 new cases every year, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women worldwide, after breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. Though the cytological examination has been the mainstay for early detection of cervical cancer, and found to be useful in detection of endometrial cancer, its widespread use has not been possible in the developing countries due to paucity of resources, man power and other facilities Its sensitivity reduces to less than 50% when there is presence of obscuring blood, inflammation or thick areas of overlapping epithelial cells. Manual Liquid Based Cytology (MLBC) is a cost effective technique that enables cells to be suspended in a monolayer and thus improve detection of precursor lesions and specimen adequacy. The residual sample can be used for other tests like Cell block and immunocytochemistry. Objectives : 1. To improve the diagnosis of gynecological cancers by a method called as Manual Liquid Based Cytology (MLBC). 2. To study a cost effective method of studying both endometrial and cervical cancer with help of ancillary techniques like cellblock, immunocytochemistry 3To compare the findings between conventional pap smear (CPS) and MLBC in detection of gynecological conditions of endometrium and cervix. Methodology : Samples were collected using Ayres spatula by split sample technique from transformation zone of cervix which included outpatients of gynecology dept. The women were aged between 20-60 years, 82 cases with bleeding history were taken to study endometrial pathology, while 100 cases of white discharge per vagina were selected to study the cervix. 60 cases were later subjected to ancillary studies like cellblock with Immunocytochemistry. Histopathological correlation was done for cases wherever possible. Results : The study on endometruim showed MLBC is more sensitive and specific than CPS in diagnosis of malignant lesions. The contingency coefficient for LBC/Histopathology V/s CPS/Histopathology was 0.572 V/s 0.556. It was observed for cervical lesion that increased detection rate was 150% for low grade intraepithelial lesion. The Positive predictive value for diagnosing neoplastic lesions on cell blocks was 75%, while Concordance Rate of CB/HistopathologyVs CPS/Histopathology was 74% vs. 54%. Conclusion : MLBC is a cost effective method for detections of cancerous lesions of endometruim and cervix.

Published in Cancer Research Journal (Volume 4, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11
Page(s) 58-68
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Manual Liquid Based Cytology, Endometrium, Cervix

References
[1] Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P et al, Endometrial cancer, Lancet: 366: 491-505. 2005.
[2] Sorosky J I Endometrial cancer, Obstet Gynecol; 120: 383-97. 2012.
[3] Bakkum Gamez J.N, Gonqalez Bosquet J Laack N.N, Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Current issues the management of endometrial cancer, Mayo clin Proc: 83; 97-112. 2008.
[4] Cancer Research UK, Available at: www. Cancer research chuk. or/cancer info/cancer stats/types/uterus /incidence /#geog.
[5] Howlader N, Noone AM, Kracho M et al. eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2008. Bethesda, MD; National Cancer Institute; 2011.
[6] Ushikima K, Current status of gynecological cancer in Japan. J Gynaec Oncol 20: 67-71. 2009.
[7] Oncology Committee. Annual report on cervical endometrial, and ovarin cancer. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 61: 913-95; 2007.
[8] Linkov F, Edvards R, Balk J et al. Endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer and prevention: gaps in existing research of modifiable risk factors. Eur J Cancer; 44: 1632-44; 2008.
[9] Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Kurzer M S Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. Cancer Epidemic biomarkers Prev; 11: 1531-43, 2002.
[10] Calle EE, Rodriguez C. Walkar-Thurmond K, Thun MJ Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in prospectively studied cohort of U.S adults. N Engl J Med; 348: 1625-38; 2003.
[11] Anderson GL, Judd HL, Kaunitz AM et al Women's health Initiative Investigators. Effects of estrogen plus rogestin on gynecologic cancers and associated diagnostic procedures: The Women's health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA. 290: 1739-48; 2003.
[12] Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from http://globocan.iarc.fr. 2013.
[13] NCRP. Consolidated report of population based cancer registries 2001-2004, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India; 2006.
[14] Sherwani RK, Khan T, Aktar K, et al. Conventional pap smear and liquid based cytology for cervical cancer screening-A comparative study. J Cytology, 24, 167-72; 2007.
[15] Kavatkar AN, Nagwamshi CA, Dabaks M. Study of a manual method of liquid based cervical cytology. Indian J Pathology and Microbiology, 59, 190-4; 2008.
[16] Deshou H, Changhua W, Quiyan L, et al. Clinical utility of LiquiPrep cytology system for primary cervical cancer screening in a large urban hospital setting in China. J Cytology, 26, 20-5.; 2009.
[17] Baker JJ). Conventional and liquid based cervicovaginal cytology. A comparison study with clinical and histologic Follow-up. Diagn Cytopathology, 27, 185-8; 2002.
[18] Maksem JA, Finnomore M, Belsheim BL, et al Manual method for liquid based cytology. A demonstration using 1,000 Gynaecological cytologies collected directly to vial and prepared by a smear – slide technique. Diagn Cytopathology, 25, 334-8; 2001.
[19] Bibbo. M, Klump, WJ, Dececco. J, and Kovatich AJ, "procedure for Immunocytochemical Detection of P16 INK4 in Thin-Layer, Liquid-Based Specimens," actacytologica, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp (2002,). 25-29 doi: 10.1159/000326711.
[20] Luzzatto. L, van. C, Haaften. C, and Boon, M.E "proliferation Patterns of Cervical cells as visualized in Leiden Liquid cytology Slides, "Diagnostic cytopathology, 31, 5-9 doi: 10.1002/dc.2011; 2004.
[21] Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J. Clin; 57: 43-66; 2007.
[22] Saad RS, Mahdavy M, Takei H, Ruiz B. Endometrial cells in cervical specimens of women 940 years of age (abstract). ActaCytol); 48: 678-9; 2004.
[23] Bean S, Connolly K, Roberson J, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of normal endometrial cells in patients 40 years and older (abstract). Acta Cytology; 48: 677; 2004.
[24] Burk JR, Lehman HF, Wolf FS. Inadequacy of Papanicolaou smears in the detection of endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med; 291: 191–92; 1974.
[25] Vuopala S. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical applicability of cytological and histological methods for investigating endometrial carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977; 70(suppl): 1–72.
[26] Bibbo M, Reale FR, Reale JC et al, Assessment of three sampling techniques to detect endometrial cancer and its precursors. A preliminary report. Acta Cytol.; 23: 353–59; 1979.
[27] Lozowski MS, Mishriki Y, Solitare GB. Factors determining the degree of endometrial exfoliation and their diagnostic implications in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol; 30: 623–27; 1986.
[28] Kuebler DL, Nikrui N, Bell DA. Cytologic features of endometrial papillary serous carcinoma. Acta Cytol; 33: 120–26; 1989.
[29] Larson DM, Johnson KK, Reyes CNJr, Broste SK. Prognostic significance of malignant cervical cytology in patients with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol; 84: 399–03; 1994.
[30] Zuna RE, Erroll M. Utility of the cervical cytologic smear in assessing endocervical involvement by endometrial carcinoma. Acta Cytol; 40: 878–84; 1996.
[31] Eddy GL, Wojtowycz MA, Piraino PS, Mazur MT. Papanicolaou smears by the Bethesda System in endometrial malignancy: utility and prognostic importance. Obstet Gynecol; 90: 999–3; 1997.
[32] Fukuda K, Mori M, Uchiyama M et al. Preoperative cervical cytology in endometrial carcinoma and its clinicopathologic relevance. Gynecol Oncol; 72: 273–77; 1999.
[33] Gu M, Shi W, Barakat RR, Thaler H, Saigo P. Pap Smear in Women with Endometrial Carcinoma. Acta Cytologica; 45(4): 555-60. 2001.
[34] Morimura Y, Nishiyama H, Hashimoto T, et al. Diagnosing endometrial carcinoma with cervical involvement by cervical cytology. Acta Cytol; 46: 284–90; 2002.
[35] DuBeshter B, Deuel C, Gillis S, Glantz C, Angel C, Guzick D. Endometrial cancer: the potential role of cervical cytology in current surgical staging. Obstet Gynecol; 101: 445–50; 2003.
[36] Brown AK, Gillis S, Deuel C, Angel C, Glantz C, Dubeshter B. Abnormal cervical cytology: a risk factor for endometrial cancer recurrence. Int J Gynecol Cancer; 15: 517–22; 2005.
[37] Thrall M, Kjeldahl K, Gulbahce HE, Pambuccian SE. Liquid-based Papanicolaou test (Sure Path) interpretations before histologic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasias and carcinomas. Cancer Cytopathology: 111(4):217–23; 2007.
[38] Canfell K, Kang YJ, Clements M, Moa AM, Barel V. Normal Endometrial Cells in Cervical Cytology: Systematic Review of Prevalence and Relation to Significant Endometrial Pathology. Journal of medical screening; 15 (4): 188-98; 2008.
[39] Solomon D, Frable WJ, Vooijs GP et al. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An international Expert Conference and Tutorial. Acta Cytol; 42: 16-24. 1998.
[40] Wood MD, Horst JA, Bibbo M. Weeding atypical glandular cell look-alikes from the true atypical lesions in liquid- based Pap tests: a review. Diagn Cytopathol; 35: 12-17; 2007.
[41] Chang A, Sandweiss L, Rose S. Cytologically benign endometrial cells in the Papanicoulaou smears of postmenopausl women. Gynecol Oncol; 80: 37-43; 2001.
[42] Mount SL, Wegner EK, Eltabbakh GH, Olmsted JI, Drejet AE. Significant increase of benign endometrial cells on Papanicolaou smears in women using hormone replacement therapy. Obstet Gynecol; 100: 445-50; 2002.
[43] Cherkis RC, Ptten SF, Andrews TJ, Dickinson JC, Patten FW. Significance of normal endometrial cells detected by cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol; 71: 242-4; 1988.
[44] Montz FJ. Significance of ‘normal endometrial cells in cervical cytology from asymptomatic postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy. Gynecol Oncol; 81: 33-9; 2001.
[45] Obenson K, Abreo F, Grafton WD. Cytohistologic correlation between AGUS and biopsy-detected lesions in postmenopausal women. Acta Cytol; 44: 41-45; 2000.
[46] Zhou J., Joseph F. Tomashefski, Jr, Khiyami A. ThinPrep Pap Tests in Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Histo - Cytological Correlation Diagnostic Cytopathology; 35: 448-53; 2007.
[47] Koss LG, Durfee GR. Cytologic diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Result of ten years of experience. Acta Cytol; 6: 519–31; 1962.
[48] Pinto A P, Degen M, Villa L L, Cibas E S. Immunomarkers in gynaecologic cytology the search for the ideal biomolecular papanicolaou test. Acta Cytol, 56, 109-21; 2012.
[49] Fetsh P, Simisir A, abati A. comparison of three commonly used cytology preparations in effusion immunocytochemistry; 26: 61-7, 2002.
[50] Skoog L, Tani E. immunocytochemistry: an indispensable technique in routine cytology. cytopathology, 22, 215-229, 2011.
[51] Nathan N A, Narayan E, Mary M, Horn M J. Cell block cytology. Improved Preparation and Its Efficacy in Diagnostic Cytology Am J Clin Pathol 114: 599-606; 2000.
[52] Luis A, Diaz Rosario, Salim E, Kabawat. Cell block preparation by inverted filter sedimentation is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in thin prep specimens. Cancer cytopathol; 90: 265-72; 2000.
[53] Gangane N, Mukerji MS, Anshu, Sharma SM. Utility of microwave Processed cell blocks as a complement to cervico-vaginal smear. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 35: 338-341; 2007.
[54] Gupta S, Halder K, Khan VA, Sodhani P. Cell block as an adjunct to conventional Papanicolaou smear for diagnosis of cervical cancer in resource-limited settings. Cytopathology. 18(5): 309-15; 2007.
[55] Catteau X, Simon P, Noël JC. Detection of High-Grade Lesions on Cell Blocks from Residual Fluids of Pap Smears Diagnosed as Low-Grade Abnormalities: A Preliminary Pilot Study. Acta Cytologica; 56: 247-250; 2012.
[56] Wei Q, Liu J, Zhang Z, Yang Q, Zhao T. Morphological features of cell blocks prepared from residual Liqui-PREP samples can distinguish between High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinomas. Acta Cytol. 55: 245-250; 2011.
[57] ShidhamVB, MehrotraR, Varsegi G, Amore K L, Hunt B, Narayan R.p16 INK4a immunocytochemistry on cell blocks as an adjunct to cervical cytology: Potential reflex testing on specially prepared cell blocks from residual liquid-based cytology specimens. Cytojournal: 1-10; 2011.
[58] Maksem JA, Finnemore M, Belsheim BL, Roose EB, Makkapati SR, Eatwell L et al. Manual method for liquid-based cytology: a demonstration using 1,000 gynecological cytologies collected directly to vial and prepared by a smear-slide technique. Diagn. Cytopathol. 25. 334-8; 2001. Nov.
[59] Shevra CR. Ghosh A, Kumar M. et al Department of Pathology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India cyclin D and Ki - expression in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrium; 61; 15-20; 2015.
[60] Liu H.G, Wang Y H, Wang L.L, Hao M.P 16ink4A and survivin diagnostic and prognostic markers in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical sqamous cell carcinoma. exp mol pathol, 44-49, 2015.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Nandini N. Manoli, Nandish S. Manoli, Lopamudra Kakoti, Akshata Kamath, Shweta Kulkarni. (2016). Manual Liquid Based Cytology in Diagnosis of Gynecologic Pathology. Cancer Research Journal, 4(4), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Nandini N. Manoli; Nandish S. Manoli; Lopamudra Kakoti; Akshata Kamath; Shweta Kulkarni. Manual Liquid Based Cytology in Diagnosis of Gynecologic Pathology. Cancer Res. J. 2016, 4(4), 58-68. doi: 10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Nandini N. Manoli, Nandish S. Manoli, Lopamudra Kakoti, Akshata Kamath, Shweta Kulkarni. Manual Liquid Based Cytology in Diagnosis of Gynecologic Pathology. Cancer Res J. 2016;4(4):58-68. doi: 10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11,
      author = {Nandini N. Manoli and Nandish S. Manoli and Lopamudra Kakoti and Akshata Kamath and Shweta Kulkarni},
      title = {Manual Liquid Based Cytology in Diagnosis of Gynecologic Pathology},
      journal = {Cancer Research Journal},
      volume = {4},
      number = {4},
      pages = {58-68},
      doi = {10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.crj.20160404.11},
      abstract = {Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a commonly encountered complaint in gynecology department. Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in women and the most frequent gynecological cancer in developed countries. With 5,28, 000 new cases every year, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women worldwide, after breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. Though the cytological examination has been the mainstay for early detection of cervical cancer, and found to be useful in detection of endometrial cancer, its widespread use has not been possible in the developing countries due to paucity of resources, man power and other facilities Its sensitivity reduces to less than 50% when there is presence of obscuring blood, inflammation or thick areas of overlapping epithelial cells. Manual Liquid Based Cytology (MLBC) is a cost effective technique that enables cells to be suspended in a monolayer and thus improve detection of precursor lesions and specimen adequacy. The residual sample can be used for other tests like Cell block and immunocytochemistry. Objectives : 1. To improve the diagnosis of gynecological cancers by a method called as Manual Liquid Based Cytology (MLBC). 2. To study a cost effective method of studying both endometrial and cervical cancer with help of ancillary techniques like cellblock, immunocytochemistry 3To compare the findings between conventional pap smear (CPS) and MLBC in detection of gynecological conditions of endometrium and cervix. Methodology : Samples were collected using Ayres spatula by split sample technique from transformation zone of cervix which included outpatients of gynecology dept. The women were aged between 20-60 years, 82 cases with bleeding history were taken to study endometrial pathology, while 100 cases of white discharge per vagina were selected to study the cervix. 60 cases were later subjected to ancillary studies like cellblock with Immunocytochemistry. Histopathological correlation was done for cases wherever possible. Results : The study on endometruim showed MLBC is more sensitive and specific than CPS in diagnosis of malignant lesions. The contingency coefficient for LBC/Histopathology V/s CPS/Histopathology was 0.572 V/s 0.556. It was observed for cervical lesion that increased detection rate was 150% for low grade intraepithelial lesion. The Positive predictive value for diagnosing neoplastic lesions on cell blocks was 75%, while Concordance Rate of CB/HistopathologyVs CPS/Histopathology was 74% vs. 54%. Conclusion : MLBC is a cost effective method for detections of cancerous lesions of endometruim and cervix.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Manual Liquid Based Cytology in Diagnosis of Gynecologic Pathology
    AU  - Nandini N. Manoli
    AU  - Nandish S. Manoli
    AU  - Lopamudra Kakoti
    AU  - Akshata Kamath
    AU  - Shweta Kulkarni
    Y1  - 2016/06/13
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11
    T2  - Cancer Research Journal
    JF  - Cancer Research Journal
    JO  - Cancer Research Journal
    SP  - 58
    EP  - 68
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8214
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.crj.20160404.11
    AB  - Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a commonly encountered complaint in gynecology department. Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in women and the most frequent gynecological cancer in developed countries. With 5,28, 000 new cases every year, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting women worldwide, after breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. Though the cytological examination has been the mainstay for early detection of cervical cancer, and found to be useful in detection of endometrial cancer, its widespread use has not been possible in the developing countries due to paucity of resources, man power and other facilities Its sensitivity reduces to less than 50% when there is presence of obscuring blood, inflammation or thick areas of overlapping epithelial cells. Manual Liquid Based Cytology (MLBC) is a cost effective technique that enables cells to be suspended in a monolayer and thus improve detection of precursor lesions and specimen adequacy. The residual sample can be used for other tests like Cell block and immunocytochemistry. Objectives : 1. To improve the diagnosis of gynecological cancers by a method called as Manual Liquid Based Cytology (MLBC). 2. To study a cost effective method of studying both endometrial and cervical cancer with help of ancillary techniques like cellblock, immunocytochemistry 3To compare the findings between conventional pap smear (CPS) and MLBC in detection of gynecological conditions of endometrium and cervix. Methodology : Samples were collected using Ayres spatula by split sample technique from transformation zone of cervix which included outpatients of gynecology dept. The women were aged between 20-60 years, 82 cases with bleeding history were taken to study endometrial pathology, while 100 cases of white discharge per vagina were selected to study the cervix. 60 cases were later subjected to ancillary studies like cellblock with Immunocytochemistry. Histopathological correlation was done for cases wherever possible. Results : The study on endometruim showed MLBC is more sensitive and specific than CPS in diagnosis of malignant lesions. The contingency coefficient for LBC/Histopathology V/s CPS/Histopathology was 0.572 V/s 0.556. It was observed for cervical lesion that increased detection rate was 150% for low grade intraepithelial lesion. The Positive predictive value for diagnosing neoplastic lesions on cell blocks was 75%, while Concordance Rate of CB/HistopathologyVs CPS/Histopathology was 74% vs. 54%. Conclusion : MLBC is a cost effective method for detections of cancerous lesions of endometruim and cervix.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Dept of Pathology, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara Medical College, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara University, Mysore Karnataka, India

  • Dept of OBG, JSS Medical College, JSS University, Mysore Karnataka, India

  • Dept of Pathology, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara Medical College, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara University, Mysore Karnataka, India

  • Dept of Pathology, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara Medical College, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara University, Mysore Karnataka, India

  • Dept of Pathology, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara Medical College, Jagadguru Shri Shivarathreswara University, Mysore Karnataka, India

  • Sections