Earth Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

Behaviors of Converted Wave in an Azimuthally Isotropic Medium - A Physical Model Study

Received: 07 August 2019    Accepted: 04 September 2019    Published: 20 September 2019
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The existence of subsurface fractures provides not only space for the residence of petroleum but also paths of migration. Therefore, subsurface fractures are of great interest to exploration geophysicists. In reflection seismology, a reservoir of vertically aligned fractures is often considered to possess azimuthal anisotropy, or Horizontal Transverse Isotropy (HTI), in terms of seismic anisotropy. The characteristics and information of this specific type of reservoir are widely obtained using seismic attributes, including the azimuthal variation in the P -wave amplitude and velocity, and the fractional difference of split S-waves. Essentially, a converted (C-) wave is initiated by a downward traveling P-wave, which is converted on reflection to upcoming S-waves. Hence, it combines the behaviors of P- and S-waves in theory. Using a forward model study, this study demonstrates the behaviors of a C-waves in a HTI medium, instead of the behaviors of P- or S-waves. Reflections are facilitated on the horizontal symmetry-axis plane of a scaled HTI model along seven different azimuths using end-on shooting arrangement. Using a P-type transducer as a source and an S-type transducer as a receiver, the behaviors of C-waves in a HTI medium are observed. In the acquired profiles, reflections of P-, PS1- (C1 -), and a mixture of PS2- ( C2-) and S1-waves were detected. The phenomenon of C-wave splitting is also observed because of the behavior of an S-wave in a Transversely Isotropic Medium (TIM), and it could be easily identified in the azimuths near the fracture plane. The reflectivity strengths obtained using a Hilbert transform show that the azimuthal variation in the Amplitude Versus Offset (AVO) for both P- and C1-waves are consistent, but the C1-wave amplitude variation depends more significantly on the azimuth than that of the P-wave. Furthermore, the percentage anisotropy of the C-wave computed from acquired data falls right between those of P- and S-waves. By incorporating C-wave splitting and azimuthal AVO variation into traditional signature analyses, our results show that the fracture orientation is more pronounced when the potential reservoir has vertically aligned fractures.

DOI 10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12
Published in Earth Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 4, August 2019)
Page(s) 228-234
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Anisotropy, Converted Wave, Splitting, Amplitude Versus Offset

References
[1] Aguilera, R. (1998). Geologic aspects of naturally fractured reservoirs. The Leading Edge 17, 1667-1670.
[2] R. A. Nelson, “Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” Elsevier Inc., 2001.
[3] Williams, M. and E. Jenner (2002). Interpreting seismic data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy; or azimuthal anisotropy in the presence of the seismic interpretation. The Leading Edge 21, 771-774. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1503192
[4] Mueller, M. C. (1992). Using shear waves to predict lateral variability in vertical fracture intensity. The Leading Edge 11, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1436870
[5] Tsvankin, I. (1997). Reflection moveout and parameter estimation for horizontal transverse isotropy. Geophysics 62, 614-629.
[6] Chang, C. H. and G. H. F. Gardner (1997). Effects of vertically aligned subsurface fractures on seismic reflections - a physical model study. Geophysics 62, 245-252.
[7] Pérez, M. A., R. L. Gibson, and M. N. Toksöz (1999). Detection of fracture orientation using azimuthal variation of P-wave AVO responses. Geophysics 64, 1253-1265. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444632
[8] Treadgold, G., C. Sicking, V. Sublette, and G. Hoover (2008). Azimuthal Processing for Fracture Prediction and Image Improvement. 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 988-992. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3063803
[9] Maultzsch, S., M. Chapman, E. Liu, and X. Y. Li (2007). Modelling and analysis of attenuation anisotropy in multi-azimuth VSP data from the Clair field. Geophysical Prospecting 55, 627-642.
[10] Ekanem, A. M., J. Wei, X. Y. Li, M. Chapman, and I. G. Main (2013). P-wave attenuation anisotropy in fractured media: A seismic physical modelling study. Geophysical Prospecting 61, 420-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01127.x
[11] Ray, R. R. (2001) S-Waves Detect Reservoir Flows. Explorer, September, 41-42.
[12] Roche, S., M. Wagaman, and H. Watt (2005). Anadarko Basin survey shows value of multicomponent acquisition. First Break 23, 43-52.
[13] Garotta R., C. Vuillermoz, and P. Y. Granger (1990) Comparing 3-D Operations and Results from Converted PS Waves. 60th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1086-1088.
[14] Reine C. and R. Tilson (2016). Insights into converted-wave AVO and its use in inversion. GeoConvention: Optimizing Resources.
[15] Sadeghi E., C. Adam, E. Siawira and H. Khairy (2017). P-S Converted wave AVO analysis for reservoir characterization. 41st Annual Convention Proceedings, Indonesian Petroleum Association.
[16] Tsvankin, I. and V. Grechka (2011). Seismology of Azimuthally Anisotropic Media and Seismic Fracture Characterization. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 372-387. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802839
[17] Ata, E. and R. J. Michelena (1995). Mapping distribution of fractures in a reservoir with P-S converted waves. The Leading Edge 14, 664-676.
[18] Gaiser, J. E. and R. Van Dok (2005). Multicomponent processing and fracture characterization analysis of 3-D PS-wave onshore seismic surveys. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/93740-MS
[19] Sun, J. and K. Innanen (2014). A review of converted wave AVO analysis. CREWES Research Report (26), 1-13.
[20] Chang, C. H., G. H. F. Gardner, and J. A. McDonald (1994). A physical model study of shear-wave propagation in a transversely isotropic solid. Geophysics 59, 484-487.
[21] Okoye, P. N., N. F. Uren, and W. Waluyo (1995). Variation of stacking velocity in transversely isotropic media. Exploration Geophysics 26, 431-436.
[22] Waluyo W., N. F. Uren, and J. A. McDonald (1995). Poisson’s ratio in transversely isotropic media and its effects on amplitude response: an investigation through physical modeling experiments. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 585-588.
[23] Grechka, V., S. Theophanis, and I. Tsvankin (1999). Joint inversion of P- and PS-waves in orthorhombic media: Theory and a physical-modeling study. Geophysics 64, 146-161.
[24] Mah, M. and D. R. Schmitt (2001). Experimental determination of the elastic coefficients of an orthorhombic material. Geophysics 66, 1217-1225.
[25] Chang, Y. F. and C. H. Chang (2001). Laboratory Results for the Features of Body Wave Propagation in a Transversely Isotropic Medium. Geophysics 66, 1921-1924.
[26] Chang, Y. F., M. C. Chou, C. H. Chang (2006). Experimental measurements of the phase and group velocities of body waves in a transversely isotropic medium. NDT&E International 39, 162-168.
[27] Barclay A. H. and D. R. Toomey (2003). Shear wave splitting and crustal anisotropy at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 35°N. Journal of Geophysical Research 108, EPM 2-1~2-8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000918
[28] Thomsen, L. (1986). Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics 51, 1954-1966.
[29] Stewart R. R., J. E. Gaiser, R. J. Brown, and D. C. Lawton (2002). Converted‐wave seismic exploration: Methods. Geophysics 67, 1348-1363. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1512781
[30] Bale, R., B. Gratacos, B. Mattocks, S. Roche, K. Poplavskii, and X. Li (2009). Shear wave splitting applications for fracture analysis and improved imaging: some onshore examples: First Break 27, 73-83.
[31] Mattocks, B., J. Li, and S. L. Roche (2005). Converted-wave azimuthal anisotropy in a carbonate foreland basin. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 897-900. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2148304
[32] Stewart R. R., J. E. Gaiser, R. J. Brown, and D. C. Lawton (1999). Converted-wave seismic exploration: a tutorial. CREWES 11 (3).
[33] Chang, C. H., Y. F. Chang, P. Y. Tseng (2017). Azimuthal variation of converted-wave amplitude in a reservoir with vertically aligned fractures a physical model study. Geophysical Prospecting 65, 221-228.
[34] R. N. Bracewell, “The Fourier transform and its application,” McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1986, pp 268-271.
[35] Rüger, A. (1998) Variations of P-wave reflectivity with offset and azimuth in anisotropic media. Geophysics 63, 935-947.
Author Information
  • Department of Biomechatronic Engineering and Research Center for Automation, Chiayi, Taiwan, R. O. C.

  • Institute of Seismology, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan, R. O. C.

  • Institute of Seismology, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan, R. O. C.

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Chih-Hsiung Chang, Young-Fo Chang, Hsiu-Chi Tsao. (2019). Behaviors of Converted Wave in an Azimuthally Isotropic Medium - A Physical Model Study. Earth Sciences, 8(4), 228-234. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Chih-Hsiung Chang; Young-Fo Chang; Hsiu-Chi Tsao. Behaviors of Converted Wave in an Azimuthally Isotropic Medium - A Physical Model Study. Earth Sci. 2019, 8(4), 228-234. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Chih-Hsiung Chang, Young-Fo Chang, Hsiu-Chi Tsao. Behaviors of Converted Wave in an Azimuthally Isotropic Medium - A Physical Model Study. Earth Sci. 2019;8(4):228-234. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12,
      author = {Chih-Hsiung Chang and Young-Fo Chang and Hsiu-Chi Tsao},
      title = {Behaviors of Converted Wave in an Azimuthally Isotropic Medium - A Physical Model Study},
      journal = {Earth Sciences},
      volume = {8},
      number = {4},
      pages = {228-234},
      doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20190804.12},
      abstract = {The existence of subsurface fractures provides not only space for the residence of petroleum but also paths of migration. Therefore, subsurface fractures are of great interest to exploration geophysicists. In reflection seismology, a reservoir of vertically aligned fractures is often considered to possess azimuthal anisotropy, or Horizontal Transverse Isotropy (HTI), in terms of seismic anisotropy. The characteristics and information of this specific type of reservoir are widely obtained using seismic attributes, including the azimuthal variation in the P -wave amplitude and velocity, and the fractional difference of split S-waves. Essentially, a converted (C-) wave is initiated by a downward traveling P-wave, which is converted on reflection to upcoming S-waves. Hence, it combines the behaviors of P- and S-waves in theory. Using a forward model study, this study demonstrates the behaviors of a C-waves in a HTI medium, instead of the behaviors of P- or S-waves. Reflections are facilitated on the horizontal symmetry-axis plane of a scaled HTI model along seven different azimuths using end-on shooting arrangement. Using a P-type transducer as a source and an S-type transducer as a receiver, the behaviors of C-waves in a HTI medium are observed. In the acquired profiles, reflections of P-, PS1- (C1 -), and a mixture of PS2- ( C2-) and S1-waves were detected. The phenomenon of C-wave splitting is also observed because of the behavior of an S-wave in a Transversely Isotropic Medium (TIM), and it could be easily identified in the azimuths near the fracture plane. The reflectivity strengths obtained using a Hilbert transform show that the azimuthal variation in the Amplitude Versus Offset (AVO) for both P- and C1-waves are consistent, but the C1-wave amplitude variation depends more significantly on the azimuth than that of the P-wave. Furthermore, the percentage anisotropy of the C-wave computed from acquired data falls right between those of P- and S-waves. By incorporating C-wave splitting and azimuthal AVO variation into traditional signature analyses, our results show that the fracture orientation is more pronounced when the potential reservoir has vertically aligned fractures.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Behaviors of Converted Wave in an Azimuthally Isotropic Medium - A Physical Model Study
    AU  - Chih-Hsiung Chang
    AU  - Young-Fo Chang
    AU  - Hsiu-Chi Tsao
    Y1  - 2019/09/20
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12
    T2  - Earth Sciences
    JF  - Earth Sciences
    JO  - Earth Sciences
    SP  - 228
    EP  - 234
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5982
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20190804.12
    AB  - The existence of subsurface fractures provides not only space for the residence of petroleum but also paths of migration. Therefore, subsurface fractures are of great interest to exploration geophysicists. In reflection seismology, a reservoir of vertically aligned fractures is often considered to possess azimuthal anisotropy, or Horizontal Transverse Isotropy (HTI), in terms of seismic anisotropy. The characteristics and information of this specific type of reservoir are widely obtained using seismic attributes, including the azimuthal variation in the P -wave amplitude and velocity, and the fractional difference of split S-waves. Essentially, a converted (C-) wave is initiated by a downward traveling P-wave, which is converted on reflection to upcoming S-waves. Hence, it combines the behaviors of P- and S-waves in theory. Using a forward model study, this study demonstrates the behaviors of a C-waves in a HTI medium, instead of the behaviors of P- or S-waves. Reflections are facilitated on the horizontal symmetry-axis plane of a scaled HTI model along seven different azimuths using end-on shooting arrangement. Using a P-type transducer as a source and an S-type transducer as a receiver, the behaviors of C-waves in a HTI medium are observed. In the acquired profiles, reflections of P-, PS1- (C1 -), and a mixture of PS2- ( C2-) and S1-waves were detected. The phenomenon of C-wave splitting is also observed because of the behavior of an S-wave in a Transversely Isotropic Medium (TIM), and it could be easily identified in the azimuths near the fracture plane. The reflectivity strengths obtained using a Hilbert transform show that the azimuthal variation in the Amplitude Versus Offset (AVO) for both P- and C1-waves are consistent, but the C1-wave amplitude variation depends more significantly on the azimuth than that of the P-wave. Furthermore, the percentage anisotropy of the C-wave computed from acquired data falls right between those of P- and S-waves. By incorporating C-wave splitting and azimuthal AVO variation into traditional signature analyses, our results show that the fracture orientation is more pronounced when the potential reservoir has vertically aligned fractures.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections