Market Design for CO<sub>2</sub> Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction

Shijun Fu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Market Design for CO₂ Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction

Shijun Fu

Published in International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 7, Issue 1)

Received: 19 January 2019 Accepted: 27 February 2019 Published: 1 April 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Market design is the core issue for reducing CO₂ emissions from coal-fired power industry, however the current carbon market has some deficiencies in this area. Utilizing the combinatorial auction way, this article proposed an enhanced carbon market special for power industry by complementing current cap-and-trade system. Concretely, the enhanced market design is improved by lower- and upper-bound price, combinatorial auction for carbon allowances initial allocation, carbon submarket trade, and electricity-environment coordinated regulation. In the enhanced market, generator competes for initial carbon allowances as a form of delivering a demand function to market organizer, which can be depicted as and settled by a stochastic linear programming model. Given the carbon allowances market supply curve (i.e., total initial allowances issued), environment regulator matches the market demand curve (i.e., through adding up those individual bid demand curves together) in a uniform market clearing price (MCP) way; by this means, initial carbon market equilibrium is reached. Under this enhanced mechanism, price of bidders is ordered according to their operational advantage, moreover, respective quantity of bid allowances is also sequenced in the same way. Comparing with current cap-and-trade system, the enhanced market design can efficiently motivate generator to reduce CO₂ emissions through controlling CO₂ intensity per sold MWh. Numerical simulation further verified the efficiency of this enhanced carbon market design.

Published in	International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11
Page(s)	1-13
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CO₂ Abatement, Carbon Market Design, Coal-fired Power Industry, Combinatorial Auction

References

[1]	Klepper G, Peterson S. (2006). Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: the climate strategy of the EU. Energy Journal 27: pp 1–26.
[2]	Ellerman, A. D., Joskow, P. L. (2008). The European Union’s emission trading system in perspective. Reports, The Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
[3]	Nielson, L. (2008). The European Emissions Trading System–lessons for Australia. Research paper, No.3: ISSN 1834–9854.
[4]	Nielsen, L., Jeppesen, T. (2003). Tradable green certificates in selected European countries—overview and assessment. Energy Policy 31: pp 3–14.
[5]	Sorrell, S., Sijm, J. (2003). Carbon trading in the policy mix. Oxford Review of Economy Policy 19: pp 420–437.
[6]	Peace, J., Juliani, T. (2009). The coming carbon market and its impact on the American economy. Policy and Society 4: pp 305–316.
[7]	Qingqing Weng, He Xu. (2018). A review of China’s Carbon trading market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 91: pp 613–619.
[8]	William W. Hogan. (2017). An efficient western energy imbalance market with conflicting carbon policies. The Electricity Journal 30: pp 8–15.
[9]	Fu, S. J. (2017). Combinatorial mitigation actions, a case study on European Union’s electricity sector. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment 2: pp 77–86.
[10]	Kejia Hu, Yuche Chen. (2019). Equilibrium fuel supply and carbon credit pricing under market competition and environmental regulations: a California case study. Applied Energy 236: pp 815–824.
[11]	Rosendahl, K. E. (2004). Cost-effective environmental policy: implications of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economy Manage 48: pp 1099–1121.
[12]	Andreas Karpf, Antoine Mandel, Stefano Battiston. (2018). Price and network dynamics in the European carbon market. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 153: pp 103–122.
[13]	Meyer, N. I. (2003). European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalized markets. Energy Policy 31: pp 665–676.
[14]	Xingang Zhao, Lei Wu, Ang Li. (2017). Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79: pp 1–8.
[15]	Alerola, E., Chevallier, J., & Cheze, B. (2009). Emissions compliances and carbon prices under the EU ETS: a country specific analysis of industrial sectors. Journal of Policy Modeling 31: pp 446–462.
[16]	Sijm, K. J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006). CO₂ cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power. Climate Policy 6: pp 49–72.
[17]	Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economy Theory 5: pp 395–418.
[18]	Hepburn, C. (2006). Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why. Climate Policy 6: pp 137–160.
[19]	Mandell, S. (2008). Optimal mix of emissions taxes and cap-and-trade. Journal of Environmental Economy Manage 56: pp 131–140.
[20]	Betz, R., Sato, M. (2006). Emissions trading: lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase. Climate Policy 6: pp 351–359.
[21]	Noah Dormady, Paul J. Healy. (2018). The consignment mechanism in carbon markets: a laboratory investigation. Journal of Commodity Markets. pp 1–15.
[22]	Fankhauser, S., Hepburn, C. (2010a). Designing carbon markets, Part II: Carbon markets in space. Energy Policy 8: pp 4381–4387.
[23]	Fankhauser, S., Hepburn, C. (2010b). Designing carbon markets, Part I: Carbon markets in time. Energy Policy 8: pp 4363–4370.
[24]	Pettersson, F. (2007). Carbon pricing and the diffusion of renewable power generation in Eastern Europe: a linear programming approach. Energy Policy 35: pp 2412–2425.
[25]	Gillenwater, M., Breidennich, C. (2009). Internalizing carbon costs in electricity markets: using certificates in a load-based emissions trading scheme. Energy policy 37: pp 290–299.
[26]	Kockar, I., Antonio, J. C., & James, R. M. (2009). Influence of the emissions trading scheme on generation scheduling. Electrical Power Energy Systems 31: pp 465–473.
[27]	Oikonomou, V., Jepma, C., Becchis, F., & Russolillo, D. (2008). White certificates for energy efficiency improvement with energy taxes: a theoretical economic model. Energy Economics 30: pp 3044–3062.
[28]	Lirong Zhang, Yakun Li, Zhijie Jia. (2018). Impact of carbon allowance allocation on power industry in China’s carbon trading market: computable general equilibrium based analysis. Applied Energy 229: pp 814–827.
[29]	Feng, H. L., Zhao, J. (2006). Alternative intertemporal permit trading regimes with stochastic abatement costs. Resource of Energy Economy 28: pp 24–40.
[30]	Wirl, F. (2006). Consequences of irreversibilities on optimal intertemporal CO₂ emission policies under uncertainty. Resource of Energy Economy 28: pp 105–123.
[31]	Sijm, J. P. M., Bakker, S. J. A., Chen, Y., & Harmsen, H. W. (2005). CO₂ price dynamics: the implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity. ECN Report. ECN–C–05–081.
[32]	Elmaghraby, Y. J. (2005). Multi-unit auctions with complementarities: Issues of efficiency in electricity auctions. European Journal of Operational Research 2: pp 430–448.
[33]	Yazhi Song, Tiansen Liu, Yin Li, Dapeng Liang. (2017). Region division of China’s carbon market based on the provincial/municipal carbon intensity. Journal of Cleaner Production 164: pp 1312–1323.
[34]	Meeus, L., Verhaegen, K., & Belmans, R. (2009). Block order restrictions in combinatorial electric energy auctions. European Journal of Operational Research 3: pp 1202–1206.
[35]	Verhaegen, K., Meeus, L., & Belmans, R. (2009). Towards an international tradable green certificate system-The challenging example of Belgium. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 13: pp 208–215.
[36]	Toczylowski, E., Zoltowska, I. (2009). A new pricing scheme for a multi-period pool-based electricity auction. European Journal of Operational Research 3: pp 1051–1062.
[37]	Parnia Samimi, Youness Teimouri, Muriati Mukhtar. (2016). A combinatorial double auction resource allocation model in cloud computing. Information Sciences 257: pp 201–216.
[38]	Dirk Briskorn, Kurt Jornsten, Philipp Zeise. (2016). A pricing scheme for combinatorial auctions based on bundle sizes. Computers & Operations Research 70: pp 9–17.
[39]	Seyedeh Aso Tafsiri, Saleh Yousefi. (2018). Combinatorial double auction–based resource allocation mechanism in cloud computing market. The Journal of Systems and Software 137: pp 322–334.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Shijun Fu. (2019). Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Shijun Fu. Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2019, 7(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Shijun Fu. Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2019;7(1):1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11,
  author = {Shijun Fu},
  title = {Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-13},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20190701.11},
  abstract = {Market design is the core issue for reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired power industry, however the current carbon market has some deficiencies in this area. Utilizing the combinatorial auction way, this article proposed an enhanced carbon market special for power industry by complementing current cap-and-trade system. Concretely, the enhanced market design is improved by lower- and upper-bound price, combinatorial auction for carbon allowances initial allocation, carbon submarket trade, and electricity-environment coordinated regulation. In the enhanced market, generator competes for initial carbon allowances as a form of delivering a demand function to market organizer, which can be depicted as and settled by a stochastic linear programming model. Given the carbon allowances market supply curve (i.e., total initial allowances issued), environment regulator matches the market demand curve (i.e., through adding up those individual bid demand curves together) in a uniform market clearing price (MCP) way; by this means, initial carbon market equilibrium is reached. Under this enhanced mechanism, price of bidders is ordered according to their operational advantage, moreover, respective quantity of bid allowances is also sequenced in the same way. Comparing with current cap-and-trade system, the enhanced market design can efficiently motivate generator to reduce CO2 emissions through controlling CO2 intensity per sold MWh. Numerical simulation further verified the efficiency of this enhanced carbon market design.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction
AU  - Shijun Fu
Y1  - 2019/04/01
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
SP  - 1
EP  - 13
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7667
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11
AB  - Market design is the core issue for reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired power industry, however the current carbon market has some deficiencies in this area. Utilizing the combinatorial auction way, this article proposed an enhanced carbon market special for power industry by complementing current cap-and-trade system. Concretely, the enhanced market design is improved by lower- and upper-bound price, combinatorial auction for carbon allowances initial allocation, carbon submarket trade, and electricity-environment coordinated regulation. In the enhanced market, generator competes for initial carbon allowances as a form of delivering a demand function to market organizer, which can be depicted as and settled by a stochastic linear programming model. Given the carbon allowances market supply curve (i.e., total initial allowances issued), environment regulator matches the market demand curve (i.e., through adding up those individual bid demand curves together) in a uniform market clearing price (MCP) way; by this means, initial carbon market equilibrium is reached. Under this enhanced mechanism, price of bidders is ordered according to their operational advantage, moreover, respective quantity of bid allowances is also sequenced in the same way. Comparing with current cap-and-trade system, the enhanced market design can efficiently motivate generator to reduce CO2 emissions through controlling CO2 intensity per sold MWh. Numerical simulation further verified the efficiency of this enhanced carbon market design.
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Shijun Fu

Department of Logistic Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Shijun Fu. (2019). Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Shijun Fu. Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2019, 7(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Shijun Fu. Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2019;7(1):1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11,
  author = {Shijun Fu},
  title = {Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-13},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20190701.11},
  abstract = {Market design is the core issue for reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired power industry, however the current carbon market has some deficiencies in this area. Utilizing the combinatorial auction way, this article proposed an enhanced carbon market special for power industry by complementing current cap-and-trade system. Concretely, the enhanced market design is improved by lower- and upper-bound price, combinatorial auction for carbon allowances initial allocation, carbon submarket trade, and electricity-environment coordinated regulation. In the enhanced market, generator competes for initial carbon allowances as a form of delivering a demand function to market organizer, which can be depicted as and settled by a stochastic linear programming model. Given the carbon allowances market supply curve (i.e., total initial allowances issued), environment regulator matches the market demand curve (i.e., through adding up those individual bid demand curves together) in a uniform market clearing price (MCP) way; by this means, initial carbon market equilibrium is reached. Under this enhanced mechanism, price of bidders is ordered according to their operational advantage, moreover, respective quantity of bid allowances is also sequenced in the same way. Comparing with current cap-and-trade system, the enhanced market design can efficiently motivate generator to reduce CO2 emissions through controlling CO2 intensity per sold MWh. Numerical simulation further verified the efficiency of this enhanced carbon market design.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Market Design for CO2 Abatement in Coal-fired Power Industry Based on Combinatorial Auction
AU  - Shijun Fu
Y1  - 2019/04/01
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
SP  - 1
EP  - 13
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7667
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20190701.11
AB  - Market design is the core issue for reducing CO2 emissions from coal-fired power industry, however the current carbon market has some deficiencies in this area. Utilizing the combinatorial auction way, this article proposed an enhanced carbon market special for power industry by complementing current cap-and-trade system. Concretely, the enhanced market design is improved by lower- and upper-bound price, combinatorial auction for carbon allowances initial allocation, carbon submarket trade, and electricity-environment coordinated regulation. In the enhanced market, generator competes for initial carbon allowances as a form of delivering a demand function to market organizer, which can be depicted as and settled by a stochastic linear programming model. Given the carbon allowances market supply curve (i.e., total initial allowances issued), environment regulator matches the market demand curve (i.e., through adding up those individual bid demand curves together) in a uniform market clearing price (MCP) way; by this means, initial carbon market equilibrium is reached. Under this enhanced mechanism, price of bidders is ordered according to their operational advantage, moreover, respective quantity of bid allowances is also sequenced in the same way. Comparing with current cap-and-trade system, the enhanced market design can efficiently motivate generator to reduce CO2 emissions through controlling CO2 intensity per sold MWh. Numerical simulation further verified the efficiency of this enhanced carbon market design.
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download