Importance of Integrated Water Resources Management in Flood and Flash Flood Management
American Journal of Environmental Protection
Volume 4, Issue 3-1, May 2015, Pages: 8-13
Received: Mar. 10, 2015; Accepted: Mar. 10, 2015; Published: Jun. 25, 2015
Views 2830      Downloads 65
Author
Nino Tkhilava, Department of Environmental Policy and International Relations, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection, Tbilisi, Georgia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Water resources management setup and practices in Georgia are relied on administrative approaches. Gradual introduction and implementation of the river basin based Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) will require corresponding legal and institutional adjustment as well as significant capacity building. The IWRM model for Georgia is intended to address prioritized concerns regarding water resource management, based on extensive consultations with stakeholders from a wide range of agencies and institutions related to water issues. Managing water efficiently, balancing conflicting uses of water resources, eliminating the results of catastrophic floods causing loss of human lives and damages to infrastructure and settlements and ensuring environmental stability of the river basins are critical issues which should be solved through ecosystem-based Integrated Water Resource Management approaches. The manuscript briefly reviews why the issue of shifting to IWRM is a priority for Georgia, what actions are needed to be implemented, and what are the sequences of these actions.
Keywords
Water, Resources, Management, Floods
To cite this article
Nino Tkhilava, Importance of Integrated Water Resources Management in Flood and Flash Flood Management, American Journal of Environmental Protection. Special Issue:Applied Ecology: Problems, Innovations. Vol. 4, No. 3-1, 2015, pp. 8-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.s.2015040301.12
References
[1]
IWRM plan for Georgia, GEF/UNDP project “Reducing transboundary degradation in the Kura-Aras river baisin”, 2014, unpublished.
[2]
Adapting to climate change in Europe and Central Asia, World Bank, 2009, p.89.
[3]
D. Kereselidze, L. Matchavariani, V. Trapaidze, L. Lagidze, G. Dokhnadze, N. Tkhilava, N. Gokhelashvili. Evaluation and Management of the Risk of Flooding River Bank. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory. Vol.3: River Basin, Reservoir Sedimentation and Water Recourses. SPRINGER International Publishing Switzerland, 2015, 463-469.
[4]
EM-DAT, The International Disaster Database, The Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters – CRED http://www.emdat.be/result-country-profile.
[5]
Developing climate resilient flood and flash flood management practices to protect vulnerable communities of Georgia, Adaptation Fund/UNDP project, 2012, unpublished.
[6]
Towords better environmental options for flood risk management, European Comission, unpublished.
[7]
Integrated flood management, concept paper, world Meteorological Organization, WMO-No. 1047,
[8]
Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part.
[9]
Integrated water resources management, Global Water Partnership Technical Advisory Committee, 2000, Stockholm. Technical Background Paper No. 4.
[10]
Key environmental Indicators, OECD, 2008, 20-23.
[11]
J. Schanze, Flood risk management - a basic framework - hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Springer, 2006, pp. 1-20.
[12]
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, WFD, Articles 3 (1) – 3(7), 13, 14.
[13]
Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of flood risks, Articles 4 ,5, 6, 7.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931