| Peer-Reviewed

Water Grabbing/ Land Grabbing in Shared Water Basins the Case of Salween River Hatgyi Dam

Received:     Accepted:     Published: 30 October 2013
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Land grabbing by foreign governments and international companies is on the rise. Faced by population growth and an ever-decreasing availability of useable/affordable land in populace states, many are looking to buy land where it is available, predominantly for agricultural and industrial purposes. But land alone is not sufficient for either of these uses. The availability of useable water resources is also a prerequisite to each land purchase. To buy land is to own its green water and have access to any blue water available to it. The development of hydropower projects, however, endeavours to buy the use of blue water, and must also come with a purchase/lease of the surrounding lands. Thus, it can also be seen as a type of ‘water grabbing’. Where the locally affected, vulnerable, pre-existing stakeholders are against the project and the loss of livelihood and rights it engenders, a hydropower project may be labelled as a vehicle for water and land grabbing. For an international river, a part of a shared basin, the water grabbing affects stakeholders living under various political regimes and with disparate local power relations. The effects of the project on both sides of a border may be the same; however, the manner in which the two governments handle the effects will be different. The Case of the Hatgyi Dam development on the Salween River, a joint project between China, Myanmar and Thailand, is an example of the above. As a controversial dam being built on an international, border river, the Hatgyi Dam case study exemplifies many of the issues to be found in similar developments across the developing world.

Published in Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science (Volume 2, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13
Page(s) 68-78
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Hatgyi Dam, Myanmar, Water Grabbing, Land Grabbing

References
[1] Mehta, L.; Veldwisch, G.J. and Franco, J..Introduction to the Special Issue: Water grabbing? Focus on the (re)appropriation of finite water resources, Water Alternatives 5(2) (2012) 193-207.
[2] Woodhouse, P, Foreign agricultural land acquisition and the visibility of water resource impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa, Water Alternatives, 5(2) (2012) 208-222.
[3] TNI, Transnational Institute,The Global Land Grab, A Primer, (Oct 2012). http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/landgrabbingprimer_0.pdf. 25 January 20133.
[4] Salween Watch, Recent Dams and Water Diversion projects,(2011).http://www.salweenwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51&Itemid=60.
[5] Wolf, T. Aaron, Salween River, In:Managing and Transforming Water Conflicts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2009), p236-239.
[6] IUCN, IWMI, Ramsar, WRI. Watersheds of Asia and Oceania AS23 Salween, Water Resources Atlas,http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/images/stories/rivers/eatlassalween.pdf.
[7] Wall Street Journal Staff Reporter, "Tensions Over Dam Projects Shift Myanmar’s Politics," The Wall Street Journal, 13th August (2011),http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904006104576504123439749638.html.
[8] Office of the State Council, China. 国务院关于印发能源发展"十二五"规划的通知/Notice of the State Council on the energy development of the "12th Five-Year Plan. 23 January 2013. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/23/content_2318554.htm. 1 February 2013
[9] Affeltranger, Bastien. "Inter-basin water transfers as a technico-political option: Thai-Burmese Projects on the Salween River." International Water Security, Domestic Threats and Opportunities. Eds: Pachova, Nakayama, and Jansky. New York/Tokyo: United Nations University, 2008. p 161-179. p163.
[10] Matthews, N. 2012, Water grabbing in the Mekong basin – An analysis of the winners and losers of Thailand’s hydropower development in Lao PDR, Water Alternatives 5(2) 392-411.
[11] Ei Ei Toe Lwin. Myitsone should not resume, say experts and locals, A Myanmar Times Special Feature, Energy, August (2012), P9. http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs14/Myanmar_Times-energy2012-red.pdf. [15 October 2012].
[12] Woods, Kevin, Ceasefire capitalism: military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China borderlands, The Journal of Peasant Studies,38:4(2011), 747-770.
[13] Gaung, Juliet Shwe, Concerns remain over Shwe gas benefits, A Myanmar Times Special Feature, Energy, August (2012),p4,http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs14/Myanmar_Times-energy2012-red.pdf. 15 October 2012,[January 2013].
[14] TERRA. Status of The Salween (Thanlwin) Dam Plans. November 1999. http://www.ibiblio.org/obl/docs/SW03.htm. 1 Dec 2012.
[15] Burma Rivers Network, Villagers Fear Salween Dam, 8 June (2011),http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/news/11-news/578-villagers-fear-salween-dam.html.[ February 2013].
[16] Steinberg, I. David,Burma/Myanmar: What Everyone Needs To Know, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2010).
[17] Irrawaddy,"KNU to Abandon Bases", 18 June (2009),http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=16078.[February 2013].
[18] KIC, Karen Information Centre, Hatgyi Dam Generates Problems for Karen Farmers, 1 March (2011).http://www.bnionline.net/feature/kic/10171-hatgyi-dam-genrates-problems-for-karen-farmers.html.[February 2013].
[19] Burma Rivers Network, Hatgyi Dam,(2013). http://www.burmariversnetwork.org/dam-projects/salween-dams/hatgyi.html. [24 September 2012].
[20] International Rivers,The Salween River Basin Fact Sheet, 24 May (2012). http://www.internationalrivers.org/resources/the-salween-river-basin-fact-sheet-7481. [January 2013].
[21] J-Power, Mae Lama Luang, Thailand,http://www.jpower.co.jp/english/international/consultation/detail_old/se_as_thailand03.pdf. [1 February 2013].
[22] TERRA, The Salween Water Diversion Project, September (2005). http://www.terraper.org/mainpage/images/keysub/1305711562_th.pdf. [February 2013].
[23] DEDE. Conclusion on Project Features of the Water Supplying Lines ofReservoir at Lower Yuam River – Reservoir at Bhumibol Dam. http://www.dede.go.th/dede/fileadmin/upload/pdf/Page_9.pdf. February 2013.
[24] Sri Su Wan. Phone Interview. 14 February 2013
[25] Anders, Jägerskog et al. Land Acquisitions: How will they Impact Transboundary Waters? Stockholm International Water Institute, SIWI. 2012
[26] Aung Hla Tun. Myanmar state media details new foreign investment law. Reuters. 3 Nov 2012. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/03/us-myanmar-investment-idUSBRE8A204F20121103. 6 Nov 2012.
[27] Bangkok Post. Myanmar’s investment law: temper applause with caution. 3 Dec 2012. http://www.bangkokpost.com/business/economics/324282/myanmar-s-investment-law-temper-applause-with-caution. 5 December 2012.
[28] Durham University Archaeology Department. How to Build A Dam and Save Cultural Heritage. Workshop. Durham, July 6th 2012.
[29] Duvail, S.; Médard, C.; Hamerlynck, O. and Nyingi, D.W. 2012. Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland: The case of the Tana delta. Water Alternatives 5(2): 322-343
[30] Earthrights. "Flooding the Future: Hydropower and Cultural Survival in the Salween River Basin." 28 April 2005. http://www.earthrights.org/burma-project/flooding-future-hydropower-and-cultural-survival-salween-river-basin. 15 October 2012.
[31] EGAT, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. Main Page. http://www.egat.co.th/ or http://www.egat.co.th/en/. 11 Feb 2013.
[32] ---. Power Development and Future Plan. 2011. http://www.egat.co.th/images/stories/annual/reports/2554/annual2011_eng_p86.pdf. 11 Feb 2013.
[33] ---. Key Statistical Data, EGAT Annual Report. 2011. http://www.egat.co.th/images/stories/annual/reports/2554/annual2011_eng_p113.pdf. 11 Feb 2013.
[34] FAO. Foreign direct investment –win-win or land grab?ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/meeting/018/k6358e.pdf. Nov 2012.
[35] ---. Salween Dams. 2011. http://www.internationalrivers.org/node/3231. January 2013.
[36] Karen Rivers Watch. Damming at Gunpoint. November 2004. http://www.freewebs.com/krw_reports/Dam%20english.pdf. January 2013.
[37] Kay, Sylvia and Franco, Jenny. Transnational Institute. Global Water Grab, A Primer. 13 March 2012. http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/watergrabbingprimer-altcover2.pdf. 5 Feb 2013.
[38] Mizzima. Push to build big dams undermines peace process in Karen State. Mizzima News. 14 March 2012. http://www.mizzima.com/news/inside-burma/6758-push-tobuild-big-dams-undermines-peace-process-in-karen-state.html. 1 Feb 2013.
[39] Myint, Soe. The geopolitical challenge for Myanmar’s energy sector. A Myanmar Times Special Feature, Energy. August 2012. P2. http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs14/Myanmar_Times-energy2012-red.pdf. 15 October 2012. January 2013.
[40] Naing, Saw Yan. "KNU Allows EGAT to Survey Salween River Dam." The Irrawaddy. 29th August 2007. http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=84166. 24th October 2012.
[41] Resource and Environment Myanmar Ltd. Projects. 2012. http://www.enviromyanmar.net/projects.html. 12 Feb 2013.
[42] Robinson,Gwen. Myanmar to delay foreign investment law. Financial Times. 17 September 2012. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6245e878-00b3-11e2-8197-00144feabdc0.html#axzz28DZvsZz4. 3 October 2012.
[43] Salween Watch, The Salween River. http://www.salweenwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=50&Itemid=59>. 5 February 2013.
[44] ---. Recent Dams and Water Diversion projects. 201). http://www.salweenwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51&Itemid=60. 5 February 2013.
[45] Saw U, Alan. "Reflections on Confidence-building and Cooperation amond Ethnic Groups in Myanmar: A Karen Case Study." P219-235 In: Ganesen, N and Hlaing, Yin Kyaw eds. Myanmar: State, Society and Ethnicity.
[46] Shu Huaying. Sinohydro Corp News Release. 11 March 2008. http://www.sinohydro.com/english/portlet?pm_pl_id=7&pm_pp_id=19&COLUMNID=11424148920001&CHCOLUMNID=11424149100001&ARTICLEID=12054551070001. February 2013.
[47] TERRA, (Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance). Calling for the Hatgyi Dam to be Stopped Immediately. 7 February 2011. http://www.terraper.org/mainpage/media_detail.php?mid=1044. 5 January 2013.
[48] Watcharapong Thongrung and Chularat Saengpassa. Controversial Hatgyi Dam to Go Ahead. Nation. 16 February 2010. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2010/02/16/business/business_30122674.php. 1 December 2012.
[49] Wolf, T. Aaron. Salween River. p236-239. In Managing and Transforming Water Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[50] World Bank. Thailand. 2011. http://data.worldbank.org/country/thailand. August 2012.
[51] U Moe Myint. I expect to see rapid change for the better. A Myanmar Times Special Feature, Energy. August 2012. P6-7. http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs14/Myanmar_Times-energy2012-red.pdf. 15 October 2012.
[52] UNCITRAL. 1958 – Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards - Status. 2013. http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention_status.html. 11 Feb 2013.
[53] UNCTAD. Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development. 12 June 2012. http://www.unctad-docs.org/files/UNCTAD_IPFSD_2012.pdf. 11 October 2012.
[54] ---. World Investment Report 2012 .5 July 2012. http://www.unctad-docs.org/files/UNCTAD-WIR2012-Full-en.pdff. 12 October 2012.
[55] ---. Country fact sheet: Myanmar, World Investment Report 2012 .5 July 2012. http://unctad.org/sections/dite_dir/docs/wir12_fs_mm_en.pdf. January 2013.
[56] ---. World Investment Prospects Survey2012–2014. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaeia2012d21_en.pdf. 21 October 2012.
[57] UNESCAP. Game-Changing Resolutions for Inclusive & Sustainable Transformation in Asia and the Pacific – Closing Statements. 23 May 2012. http://www.unescap.org/speeches/game-changing-resolutions-inclusive-sustainable-transformation-asia-and-pacificc. 20 October 2012.
[58] ---. Member States. http://www.unescap.org/about/member-statess. 20 October 2012.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    E. Zerrouk. (2013). Water Grabbing/ Land Grabbing in Shared Water Basins the Case of Salween River Hatgyi Dam. Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science, 2(5), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    E. Zerrouk. Water Grabbing/ Land Grabbing in Shared Water Basins the Case of Salween River Hatgyi Dam. J. Water Resour. Ocean Sci. 2013, 2(5), 68-78. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    E. Zerrouk. Water Grabbing/ Land Grabbing in Shared Water Basins the Case of Salween River Hatgyi Dam. J Water Resour Ocean Sci. 2013;2(5):68-78. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13,
      author = {E. Zerrouk},
      title = {Water Grabbing/ Land Grabbing in Shared Water Basins the Case of Salween River Hatgyi Dam},
      journal = {Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science},
      volume = {2},
      number = {5},
      pages = {68-78},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wros.20130205.13},
      abstract = {Land grabbing by foreign governments and international companies is on the rise. Faced by population growth and an ever-decreasing availability of useable/affordable land in populace states, many are looking to buy land where it is available, predominantly for agricultural and industrial purposes. But land alone is not sufficient for either of these uses. The availability of useable water resources is also a prerequisite to each land purchase. To buy land is to own its green water and have access to any blue water available to it. The development of hydropower projects, however, endeavours to buy the use of blue water, and must also come with a purchase/lease of the surrounding lands. Thus, it can also be seen as a type of ‘water grabbing’. Where the locally affected, vulnerable, pre-existing stakeholders are against the project and the loss of livelihood and rights it engenders, a hydropower project may be labelled as a vehicle for water and land grabbing. For an international river, a part of a shared basin, the water grabbing affects stakeholders living under various political regimes and with disparate local power relations. The effects of the project on both sides of a border may be the same; however, the manner in which the two governments handle the effects will be different. The Case of the Hatgyi Dam development on the Salween River, a joint project between China, Myanmar and Thailand, is an example of the above. As a controversial dam being built on an international, border river, the Hatgyi Dam case study exemplifies many of the issues to be found in similar developments across the developing world.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Water Grabbing/ Land Grabbing in Shared Water Basins the Case of Salween River Hatgyi Dam
    AU  - E. Zerrouk
    Y1  - 2013/10/30
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13
    T2  - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science
    JF  - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science
    JO  - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science
    SP  - 68
    EP  - 78
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7993
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20130205.13
    AB  - Land grabbing by foreign governments and international companies is on the rise. Faced by population growth and an ever-decreasing availability of useable/affordable land in populace states, many are looking to buy land where it is available, predominantly for agricultural and industrial purposes. But land alone is not sufficient for either of these uses. The availability of useable water resources is also a prerequisite to each land purchase. To buy land is to own its green water and have access to any blue water available to it. The development of hydropower projects, however, endeavours to buy the use of blue water, and must also come with a purchase/lease of the surrounding lands. Thus, it can also be seen as a type of ‘water grabbing’. Where the locally affected, vulnerable, pre-existing stakeholders are against the project and the loss of livelihood and rights it engenders, a hydropower project may be labelled as a vehicle for water and land grabbing. For an international river, a part of a shared basin, the water grabbing affects stakeholders living under various political regimes and with disparate local power relations. The effects of the project on both sides of a border may be the same; however, the manner in which the two governments handle the effects will be different. The Case of the Hatgyi Dam development on the Salween River, a joint project between China, Myanmar and Thailand, is an example of the above. As a controversial dam being built on an international, border river, the Hatgyi Dam case study exemplifies many of the issues to be found in similar developments across the developing world.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • GSGES, Kyoto University, Japan

  • Sections