DFT Study of Oxidation Reaction Paths for Ethanol Gasoline
Journal of Energy and Natural Resources
Volume 9, Issue 1, March 2020, Pages: 39-43
Received: Feb. 17, 2020; Published: Mar. 26, 2020
Views 162      Downloads 115
Authors
Li Na, SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, Beijing, China
Han Lu, SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, Beijing, China
Guo Xin, SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, Beijing, China
Tao Zhiping, SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, Beijing, China
Long Jun, SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, Beijing, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
A DFT study of oxidation reaction for ethanol molecule and representative conventional molecule in gasoline was performed. At first, the homolytic dissociation energy of the different C-H bond in ethanol and hydrocarbon molecules was calculated and the C-H active sites most likely to be attacked by oxygen molecule were obtained. Then, the reaction barrier of oxidation initiation reaction for different molecules was compared to conclude that the barrier energy of ethanol molecule was lower than the conventional gasoline molecule. It was found that the lower energy gap between the HOMO orbital of ethanol molecule and the LUMO orbital of oxygen molecule was the driving force to the oxidation initiation reaction. In addition, the possible further reaction paths of ethanol free radical after dehydrogenation have also been investigated, which may generate acetaldehyde or acetic acid. The two reaction paths actually existed at the same time, though compared with the acetic acid steps, the reaction path was shorter for generating acetaldehyde. It was indicated that ethanol gasoline is more prone to oxidation than conventional gasoline, which leads to changes in its molecular composition and physical and chemical properties. We should pay attention to the oxidation stability of ethanol gasoline during its storage and use.
Keywords
Ethanol Gasoline, Oxidation Chain Radical Reaction, Molecular Simulation, DFT Method
To cite this article
Li Na, Han Lu, Guo Xin, Tao Zhiping, Long Jun, DFT Study of Oxidation Reaction Paths for Ethanol Gasoline, Journal of Energy and Natural Resources. Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020, pp. 39-43. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20200901.17
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Nagpal JM, Joshi GC, Singh J, Kumar K. Studies on the nature of gum formed in cracked naphtas [J]. Oxid Commun 1998, 21 (4): 468-477.
[2]
Xue Dong, Yachao Chang, Bo Niu, et al. Development of a practical reaction model of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) formation and oxidation for diesel surrogate fuel [J]. Fuel, 2020, 267: 117159.
[3]
Kinoshita M, Saito A, Matsushita S, Shibata H, Niwa Y. Study of deposit formation mechanism on gasoline injection nozzle [C]. SAE paper 1998, 19: 355-357.
[4]
Li Na, Long Jun, Zhao Yi, et al. Molecular Simulation of the Mechanism of Oxidation Gum Formation of Typical Gasoline Hydrocarbon [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2018, 34 (2): 354-364.
[5]
Li Na, Long Jun, Zhao Yi, Tao Zhiping, Dai Zhenyu. DFT study of oxidation initiation for different compound in gasoline [J]. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, 2017, 6 (3): 242-245.
[6]
Paul Lacey, Sandro Gail, Jean Marc Kientz, et al. Internal Fuel Injector Deposits [C]. SAE Paper 2011-01-1925.
[7]
Akio Tanaka, Koichi Yamada, Toshihiko Omori, et al. Inner Diesel Injector Deposit Formation Mechanism [C]. SAE Paper, 2013-01-2661.
[8]
Ji Xiang, Song Yingjin, Liu Rui, et al. Effect of oxidation decay of alcohol fuel engine on exhaust emission [J]. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 34 (5): 573-576.
[9]
Nicholas J. Kuprowicz, Steven Zabarnick, Zachary J. West, et al. Use of Measured Species Class Concentrations with Chemical Kinetic Modeling for the Prediction of Autoxidation and Deposition of Jet Fuels [J]. Energy & Fuels 2007, 21, 530-544.
[10]
Ruben Epping, Stefanie Kerkering, Jan T. Andersson. Influence of Different Compound Classes on the Formation of Sediments in Fossil Fuels During Aging [J]. energy& fuels, 2014, 28: 5649-5656.
[11]
Zheng Guiling. Influence of compounds containing nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen on the oxidation stability of oil [D]. Beijing, China University of Petroleum, 2018.
[12]
Delley B. From molecules to solids with the Dmol3 approach [J]. J Chem Phys, 2000, 113 (18): 7756-7764.
[13]
Kohn W, Sham L J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects [J]. Phys Rev, 1965, 140 (4A): A1133-A1138.
[14]
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77: 3865-3868.
[15]
Kamlesh Kumar, Prashant Kumar, Penny Joshi, et al. IBX-TfOH mediated oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes and ketones under mild reaction conditions [J]. Tetrahedron Letters, 2020, 2: 151749.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186