This paper describes an innovative technology that provides an alternative to management of wastes arising from grass cuttings, weeds and agro-forestry residues that are usually discarded unattended. These wastes are now converted into biochar pellets using a newly designed carboniser which is highly economical and can generate employment opportunities to peri-urban and rural low income populations. We used simple spent oil drum with an attached chimney and cassava based starch or clay (e.g. kaolin) as binder to make pellets from the burnt raw materials. This process does not require any moving parts, electricity or any additional fuel to convert the waste into charcoal pellets. We have field tested the carboniser with elephant grass (Pennistum purpureum) as feedstock. Technical performance was evaluated using parameters such as Production Capacity Ratio (PCR), Reliability Ratio (RR) and Efficiency Ratio (ER). Samples of elephant grass, biochar pellets and the ash produced after the biochar used for cooking were analysed for selected chemical characteristics (viz. sulphur, carbon, hydrogen, potassium and calorific value), using standard laboratory procedures. The results obtained gave production capacity and efficiency ratio of 83%; actual production capacity of 25 kg/hour; which is 100% reliable. The differences in the chemical parameters for the three samples were significant. Potassium, carbon and calorific values were observed in increasing order: ash < elephant grass < biochar. Biochar gave lowest values of hydrogen (12.36±0.01%) and sulphur (0.67±0.0%) contents while elephant grass contained highest values of these elements (13.28±.02% and 1.38±0.00%, respectively). This technology will benefit less educated rural and peri-urban populations to develop a small scale or medium scale entrepreneurship with low financial inputs and minimal skills and the product is a good cooking fuel and environment friendly with less or no smoke.
| Published in | International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy (Volume 3, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18 |
| Page(s) | 179-184 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Agro-Forestry Residues, Biochar Pellets, Carboniser, Elephant Grass
| [1] | F. Karaosmanoglu, A. Isigigur-Ergundenler and A. Sever, (2000). ‘Biochar from the straw-stalk of rapeseed plant’, Energy and Fuels, 14, pp. 336–339. |
| [2] | A. Demirbas (2004a). ‘Determination of calorific values of bio-chars and pyro-oils from pyrolysis of beech trunkbarks. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 72, pp. 215–219. |
| [3] | P. Harris (1999). ‘On charcoal’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 24, pp. 301–306. |
| [4] | B. Glaser, L. Haumaier, G. Guggenberger and W. Zech (2001). ‘The Terra Preta phenomenon: A model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics’. Naturwissenschaften, 88, pp. 37–41. |
| [5] | J. Lehmann, J. Gaunt and M. Rondon (2006), ‘Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – a review’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, pp. 403–427. |
| [6] | J. Lehmann, D. C Kern, B. Glaser and W. I. Woods (2003). Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties, Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. |
| [7] | D. Day, R. J.Evans, J. W. Lee, and D. Reicosky (2005). Economical CO2, SOx, andNOx capture from fossil–fuel utilization with combined renewable hydrogen productionand large-scale carbon sequestration, Energy, 30, pp. 2558–2579. |
| [8] | J. Gaunt and J. Lehmann (2008). ‘Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production’, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, pp. 4152–4158. |
| [9] | K. C. Das, M. Garcia-Perez, B. Bibens and N. Melear (2008). Slow pyrolysis of poultrylitter and pine woody biomass: Impact of chars and bio-oils on microbial growth,J. Environ. Sci. Health: Part A, 43, pp. 714–724. |
| [10] | Wei Zheng, and B. K. Sharma (2010). Using Biochar as a Soil Amendment for Sustainable Agriculture. Pp 8-9 from: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/.../Using%20Biochar%20as%20a%20Soil (Accessed on 1/03/2014). |
| [11] | [11]S. Yaman (2004). Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstock, Energ.Conver. Manag, 45: 651–671. |
| [12] | Y. Shinogi, H. Yoshida, T. Koizumi, M. Yamaoka and T. Saito (2002). Basic characteristics of low-temperature carbon products from waste sludge, Adv. Environ. Res., 7, 661–665. |
| [13] | S. Pacala and R. Socolow (2004). ‘Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies’, Science, 305, pp. 968–972. |
| [14] | M. Black and G. M. Richte (2010). Mapping out global biomass projections, technological developments and policy innovations. A background paper prepared for the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) for an international ESPA workshop on biomass energy, 29-21 October 2010, Parliament House Hotel, Edinburgh. Available at http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02986. pdf (accessed on 10/04/2014). |
| [15] | F. Mugo and T. Gathui (2010). Biomass energy use in Kenya. A background paper prepared for the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) for an international ESPA workshop on biomass energy, 29-21 October 2010, Parliament House Hotel, Edinburgh. Available at http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02985.pdf (accessed on 10/04/2014). |
| [16] | G. Farrell, S. A. Simons and R. J. Hillocks (2002). Pests, diseases, and weeds of Napier grass, Pennisetum purpureum: a review, International Journal of Pest Management, 48(1), 39-48. |
| [17] | V. Strezov, T. J. Evans and C. Hayman (2008). Thermal conversion of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) to bio-gas, bio-oil and charcoal, Bioresources Technology, 99, 8394-8399. |
| [18] | Z. R. Khan, C. A. O. Midega, L. J. Wadhams, J. A. Pickett and A. Mumuni (2007). Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureun) varieties for use as trap plants for the management of African stemborer (Busseolafusca) in a push-pull strategy Entomologia Experimentaliset Applicata, 124, 201-211. |
| [19] | T. B. Hammed, A. A Soyingbe, and D. O. Adewole (2011). An Abattoir Waste Water Management through Composting: A Case Study of Alesinloye Waste Recycling Complex. TheInternational Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6, Issue 2, pp. 67-78. |
| [20] | M. R. Motsara and R. N. Roy (2008). Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 19, 101-103. |
| [21] | American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) (2007), Standard Test Method for Chemical Analysis of Wood Charcoal, ASTM D1762-84. From: http://biochar.bioenergylists.org/astmd1762. (Retrieved 01/04/2014). |
| [22] | AOAC (Association of official analytical chemist) Official method of analysis (2005) 18th Edition. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Official method |
| [23] | B. Wondwossen (2009). Preparation of charcoal using agricultural wastes, Ethiop. J. Educ. & Sc., 5, No 1, pp. 84. |
| [24] | L. Johannes and J. Stephen (2009). Biochar for Environmental Management: An Introduction. ES_BEM_16-2, 17: 23. |
| [25] | I. F. Odesola and T. A.Owoseni (2010). Development of Local Technology for a Small-Scale Biochar Production Processes from Agricultural Wastes, Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS), 1 (2), 205-208. |
| [26] | T. A. J. Kuhlbusch (1995). Method for determining black carbon in residues of vegetation fires. Environ. Sci. Technol, 29, 2695-2702. |
| [27] | Y. Chun, G. Sheng, C. T. Chiou and B. Xing (2004). Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, pp. 4649-4655. |
| [28] | F. A. O. (1985), Quality control of charcoal and by-productshttp://www.fao.org/docrep/x5555e/x5555e09.htm) Accessed on 9/04/2014. |
| [29] | C. Ryu, V. N. Sharifi and J. Swithenbank (2007). Waste pyrolysis and generation ofstorable char, Int. J. Energ. Res, 31, 177–191. |
| [30] | The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) (2010), Biomass energy in India. A background paper prepared for the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) for an international ESPA workshop on biomass energy, 29-21 October 2010, Parliament House Hotel, Edinburgh. Available at http:// pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02989.pdf (Accessed on 23/02/14) |
| [31] | A. Demirbas (2004b). ‘Bioenergy, global warming and environmental impacts’, Energy Sources, 26: pp. 225–236. |
| [32] | S.C. Bhattacharya and P. Abdul Salam (2002). ‘Low greenhouse gas biomass options for cooking in the developing countries’ Biomass and Bioenergy, 22, pp. 305–317. |
| [33] | R. Bailis, M. Ezzati and D. M. Kammen (2005). ‘Mortality and greenhouse gas impacts of biomass and petroleum energy futures in Africa’, Science, 308, pp. 98–103. |
| [34] | T. V. S. Chhay, K. Borin and T. R Preston (2013). Effect of different levels of biochar on the yield and nutritive value of Celery cabbage (Brassica chinensisvar), Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis), Mustard green (Brassica juncea) and Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica).Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 25, Article #8. from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/1/chha25008.htm (Retrieved March 10, 2014). |
APA Style
Taiwo Babatunde Hammed, Mynepalli Kameswara Chandra Sridhar. (2014). A Closed Drum Carboniser for Converting Ligno-Cellulosic Residues to Biochar Pellets: A Nigerian Study. International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy, 3(6), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18
ACS Style
Taiwo Babatunde Hammed; Mynepalli Kameswara Chandra Sridhar. A Closed Drum Carboniser for Converting Ligno-Cellulosic Residues to Biochar Pellets: A Nigerian Study. Int. J. Sustain. Green Energy 2014, 3(6), 179-184. doi: 10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18,
author = {Taiwo Babatunde Hammed and Mynepalli Kameswara Chandra Sridhar},
title = {A Closed Drum Carboniser for Converting Ligno-Cellulosic Residues to Biochar Pellets: A Nigerian Study},
journal = {International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy},
volume = {3},
number = {6},
pages = {179-184},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijrse.20140306.18},
abstract = {This paper describes an innovative technology that provides an alternative to management of wastes arising from grass cuttings, weeds and agro-forestry residues that are usually discarded unattended. These wastes are now converted into biochar pellets using a newly designed carboniser which is highly economical and can generate employment opportunities to peri-urban and rural low income populations. We used simple spent oil drum with an attached chimney and cassava based starch or clay (e.g. kaolin) as binder to make pellets from the burnt raw materials. This process does not require any moving parts, electricity or any additional fuel to convert the waste into charcoal pellets. We have field tested the carboniser with elephant grass (Pennistum purpureum) as feedstock. Technical performance was evaluated using parameters such as Production Capacity Ratio (PCR), Reliability Ratio (RR) and Efficiency Ratio (ER). Samples of elephant grass, biochar pellets and the ash produced after the biochar used for cooking were analysed for selected chemical characteristics (viz. sulphur, carbon, hydrogen, potassium and calorific value), using standard laboratory procedures. The results obtained gave production capacity and efficiency ratio of 83%; actual production capacity of 25 kg/hour; which is 100% reliable. The differences in the chemical parameters for the three samples were significant. Potassium, carbon and calorific values were observed in increasing order: ash < elephant grass < biochar. Biochar gave lowest values of hydrogen (12.36±0.01%) and sulphur (0.67±0.0%) contents while elephant grass contained highest values of these elements (13.28±.02% and 1.38±0.00%, respectively). This technology will benefit less educated rural and peri-urban populations to develop a small scale or medium scale entrepreneurship with low financial inputs and minimal skills and the product is a good cooking fuel and environment friendly with less or no smoke.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Closed Drum Carboniser for Converting Ligno-Cellulosic Residues to Biochar Pellets: A Nigerian Study AU - Taiwo Babatunde Hammed AU - Mynepalli Kameswara Chandra Sridhar Y1 - 2014/12/27 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18 T2 - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy JF - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy JO - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy SP - 179 EP - 184 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1549 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20140306.18 AB - This paper describes an innovative technology that provides an alternative to management of wastes arising from grass cuttings, weeds and agro-forestry residues that are usually discarded unattended. These wastes are now converted into biochar pellets using a newly designed carboniser which is highly economical and can generate employment opportunities to peri-urban and rural low income populations. We used simple spent oil drum with an attached chimney and cassava based starch or clay (e.g. kaolin) as binder to make pellets from the burnt raw materials. This process does not require any moving parts, electricity or any additional fuel to convert the waste into charcoal pellets. We have field tested the carboniser with elephant grass (Pennistum purpureum) as feedstock. Technical performance was evaluated using parameters such as Production Capacity Ratio (PCR), Reliability Ratio (RR) and Efficiency Ratio (ER). Samples of elephant grass, biochar pellets and the ash produced after the biochar used for cooking were analysed for selected chemical characteristics (viz. sulphur, carbon, hydrogen, potassium and calorific value), using standard laboratory procedures. The results obtained gave production capacity and efficiency ratio of 83%; actual production capacity of 25 kg/hour; which is 100% reliable. The differences in the chemical parameters for the three samples were significant. Potassium, carbon and calorific values were observed in increasing order: ash < elephant grass < biochar. Biochar gave lowest values of hydrogen (12.36±0.01%) and sulphur (0.67±0.0%) contents while elephant grass contained highest values of these elements (13.28±.02% and 1.38±0.00%, respectively). This technology will benefit less educated rural and peri-urban populations to develop a small scale or medium scale entrepreneurship with low financial inputs and minimal skills and the product is a good cooking fuel and environment friendly with less or no smoke. VL - 3 IS - 6 ER -
Information
Email: