The Relationship Between Students’ Personality Types and Their Academic Achievement in Oromia Colleges of Teachers’ Education
International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Volume 5, Issue 3, June 2020, Pages: 47-55
Received: Jun. 2, 2020; Accepted: Jun. 20, 2020; Published: Jul. 30, 2020
Views 148      Downloads 70
Gadisa Wando Shaka, Department of Psychology, Fitche College of Teachers Education, Oromia, Ethiopia
Article Tools
Follow on us
The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between students’ personality types and their academic achievement at Oromia Colleges of Teachers’ Education. Correlational design was used to conduct the study. The population of the study was 2291 male and 2734 female students in four Oromia Teachers’ Education Colleges. 357 students were selected using stratified sampling techniques and followed by simple random sampling method from four randomly selected colleges. The instrument adapted for the study was the 44-item standardized questionnaire known as the Big Five Inventory constructed by John, Donahue, and Kentle as cited in John & Srivastava (1999). The instrument was piloted before it used for final study and found reliably and valid. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Pearson moment correlation was used to determine the strength of relationship between each personality type and academic achievement. In addition, multiple regressions was used to determine the extent to which the independent variables Agreeableness, Conscientiousness Extraversion, Neuroticism and Open to experience predict the dependent variables grade point average in Oromia Colleges of Teachers’ Education. The result of the study show that there was positive significant relationship between students’ personality types namely Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Open to experience and their academic achievement. It was suggested that teachers are expected to identify the personality profiles of their students, to render necessary academic help according to personality nature of students. Oromia Education Bureau is expected to arrange training and seminar, and workshop as well as experience sharing on the issue of students’ behaviors in general and personality types in particular. In addition, it is suggested to strength guidance and counseling service in Colleges of Teachers’ Education.
OCEAN, Academic Achievement, Oromia Colleges of Teachers Education, Relationship
To cite this article
Gadisa Wando Shaka, The Relationship Between Students’ Personality Types and Their Academic Achievement in Oromia Colleges of Teachers’ Education, International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2020, pp. 47-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpbs.20200503.12
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Aemero Asmamaw et al (2019). General psychology module. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Science and Higher Education. Unpublished.
Alshehri KA. et al (2018). The relationship between personality type and the academic achievement of medical students in a Saudi medical school. Int. journal of Community Med Public Health: 5: 3205-11.
Annie W. (1996) Achievement and Ability Tests - Definition of the Domain, Educational Measurement. University Press of America, pp. 2–5.
BoFEDO (2010). Finance and Economic Development Bureau of Oromia Regional Government- GIS Data Base. Unpublished.
Chomoro-Premuzic T. & Furnham A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, pp 319-338.
Chomoro-Premuzic T. & Furnham A. (2006). Personality traits and academic performance. European Journal of Personality, pp 237-250.
Chowdhury M. (2006) Students’ personality traits and academic performance: A Five Factors Model Perspective. volume 9 number 3 Network.
Costa, T & McCrae, R. R (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, pp 5-13.
De Raad B. & Schouwenburg C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: a review. European Journal of Personality, pp 303-336.
Digman J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, pp 417-440.
Dinka B. (2013). Personality Type And Learning styles As Correlates Of Academic Performance of High School. Unpublished M. A. Thesis, A. A. U.
Fraenkel J. & Wallen N. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (10th ed.). New York: The McGrraw- Hill EnglerCompanies Inc.
Goldberg L. R. (1992). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48 pp 26–34.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and Theoretical perspectives. Theory and research (Vol. 2), pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
Khan. M. A. & Bhat A. G. (2008). Personality Profiles of High and Low Achievers. Insight: The Journal of Applied Research in Education. 14 (1), pp 28-35.
Koning B. B., Loyens S. M.., Riker R. M.., Smeets G. &Molen H. T. (2012). Generation Psychology: Student Characteristics and Academic Achievement in a Three-year Problem-based Learning Bachelor Program. Learning and Individual Differences 22: pp 313-323.
Kour P. & Sharma P. (2013). International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. ISSN: 0211-2278, Jammu, India.
Kuncel N. R., Crede M., & Thomas L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A Meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75 (1), pp 63-82.
Laidra K., Pullmann H., &`Allik J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement. Across- sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, pp 1-11.
Lodico M., Spaulding D. & Voegtle K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. (2nd ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Lounsbury et al (2003). The development of a big five adolescent personality scale. Psycho educational assessment volume (21) pp 111-133.
McCrae, R. & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction on five factor model and its implications. Journal of Personality, pp 169-175.
McKenzie (1989). Neuroticism and academic achievement: The Five factor. Personality and Individual Differences, pp 509- 515.
Morgan D. W & KrejcieR. V (1970) Educational and Psychological Measurement: University of Minnesota, Doluth.
Paunonen S. V. & Ashton M. C. (2001). Big Five Predictors of Academic Achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, pp 78-90.
Pressley et al (1997). Some of the reasons why preparing for exams is so hard: What can be done to make it easier? Educational Psychology Review, 9 (1), 1-38.
S. Hafiz (2016) Personality as Predictors of Academic Achievement among University Students, International Journal of Indian Psychology, Volume 3, Issue 3, No. 6, DIP: 18.01.100/20160303.
Soraya H., Elaheh H. & Masoud G. (2011) Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, pp 836–845.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186