Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria

Edem Okon Akpan; Noor Afza Amran

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17

| Peer-Reviewed

Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria

Edem Okon Akpan, Noor Afza Amran

Published in Journal of Finance and Accounting (Volume 2, Issue 3)

Received: 9 May 2014 Accepted: 3 June 2014 Published: 20 June 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between board characteristics and company performance (measured by turnover) in Nigeria. The study uses multiple regression technique on 90 sampled firms from the main board of Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2012. The empirical evidence shows that board size and board education are positively and significantly related to company performance. While there is no relationship between board equity, board independence, and board age. Also, this study evidences a negative significant between board women and turnover. Their appointment is window dressing as the percentage is too small for meaningful positive effect on company performance. Based on this finding, the study recommends legislation mandating companies listed on Nigerian Stock Exchange to appoint at least 30 to 35% of women on the board of directors.

Published in	Journal of Finance and Accounting (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
Page(s)	81-89
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Board Characteristics, Company Performance, Nigeria

References

[1]	Abor, J. (2007). Corporate governance and financing decisions of Ghanaian listed firms: Cor-porate governance. International Journal of Business in Society, 22(1), 83-92.
[2]	Adams, R. & Mehra,.H. (2002). Board structure and banking firm performance. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
[3]	Adams, R. B., & Mehran, H. (2005).Corporate performance, board structure and its determinants in the Banking Industry.EFA 2005 MOSCOW Meet-ings.
[4]	Adams, R.B., & Ferreira, D. (2009).Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
[5]	Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377 – 403.
[6]	Akhalumeh, P., Ohiokho, F., & Ohiokha, G. (2011). Board composition and corporate performance: An analysis of evidence from Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(4), 64 – 73.
[7]	Amran, N. A., & Ahmad, A. C. (2010).Corporate governance mechanisms and performance: Analysis of Malaysian family and non-family controlled companies. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6(2), 1 – 15.
[8]	Ararat, M. Aksa, M., & Cetin, A. T. (2010). Impact of board diversity on board monitoring intensity and firm performance: Evidence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Paper Presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Multinational Finance Society 27 – 30 June Barcelona, available at: http://paper.ssrn.com/50/3/paper.cfm?abstractid=1572283 accessed 26 June 2013.
[9]	Babatunde, A., & Olaniran, O. (2009).The effect of internal and external mechan-isms on governance and performance of corporate firms in Nigeria. Corporate Ownership and Control, 7(2), 330 – 340.
[10]	Bär, M., Niessen, A., and Ruenzi, S. (2009), “The impact of team diversity on mutual fund performance”, working paper, Centre for Financial Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, February.
[11]	Bhabra, G. S., Ferris, P. S., Seri, N. (2003). Corporate governance in Singapore: The impact of director equity ownership. Advance in Financial Economics, 8, 29 – 46.
[12]	Bhagat, S., Carey, D., & Elson, C. M. (1998).Director ownership corporate performance and management turnover. Business Lawyer, 54(3), 885 – 919.
[13]	Bhugat, S., & Black, B. (2002).The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27(2), 231 – 274.
[14]	Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firms' market values? Evidence from Korea. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(2), 366-413.
[15]	Bøhren, Ø. and Strøm, R. (2007), “Aligned informed and decisive: Characteristics of valuecreating boards”, work-ing paper, Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, 12 February.
[16]	Booth, J. R., Cornett, M. M., & Tehranian, H. (2002). Boards of directors, ownership and regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1973 – 1996.
[17]	Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J., & Simpson, W.G. (2003), Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
[18]	CBN (2006). CBN Code of Corporate Governance for Banks in Nigeria Post Consolidation, Nigeria Ab-uja
[19]	Cheng, L. T. W., Chan, R. Y. K., & Leung, T. Y. (2010). Management demography and corporate performance: Evidence from China. International Business Review and Quantitative Analysis, 42(4), 941 – 962.
[20]	Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantita-tive and mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[21]	Dagsson, S. (2011). How age diversity on the board of directors affects firm performance. (Unpublished Thesis).
[22]	Darmadi, S. (2011). Board diversity and firm performance: The Indonesian evi-dence. Corporate Ownership and Control. 9(1), 524-539.
[23]	Dwyer, S., Richard, O.C., and Chadwick, K. (2003), “Gender diversity in management and firm performance: the influence of growth orientation and organizational culture”, Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 1009-1019.
[24]	Ehikioya, B. I. (2009). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 231 – 243.
[25]	Eklund, J. E., Palmberg, J., &Wiberg, D. (2009).Ownership structure, board composi-tion and investment performance.Working Paper, Center for Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies. Stockholm, March, 2009.
[26]	Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and theory of the firm. Journal Political Economics, 88(2), 288 – 307.
[27]	Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983).Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 327 – 349.
[28]	Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M, (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301 – 325.
[29]	Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85-106.
[30]	Gre-gory-Smith, I., Brian, G. M., Charles, A. (2012). Appointing women to the board in the UK. Working Paper.
[31]	Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The organizations as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193 – 206.
[32]	Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corpora-tions. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349.
[33]	Hanoku, Bathula (2008). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from New Zealand. Unpublished Thesis.
[34]	Hashim, H. A., & Devi, S. S. (2010). Corporate governance, ownership structure and earnings quality: Malaysian evidence. Working Paper, University Malaya.
[35]	Heravia, S., Saat, N. M., Karbhari., Y. & Nassir, A. (2011). Effective Oversight Roles of Board of Directors: The case of listed firms on Bursa Malaysia. World Review of Business Research, 1(1), 231 – 245.
[36]	Hermalian, B. &Weisbach, M. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic litera-ture. Economic Policy Review, 7 – 25.
[37]	Hermalin, B. E., &Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature (No.W8161). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[38]	Hillman, A. &Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependency perspec-tive. Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), 383-396
[39]	Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., &Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adopta-tion of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 7, 235-255.
[40]	Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Man-agement Review, 21(2), 113 – 130.
[41]	Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831 – 80.
[42]	Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305 – 360.
[43]	Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incen-tives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225 – 264.
[44]	Puthenpurackal, J. Upadhyay, A .(2013). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The impact of information environment. Available at www.efmaefm.org/.../BoardGenderDiversity_Puthenpurack
[45]	John, K., & Sen-bet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 371 – 403.
[46]	Kajola, S. A. (2010). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: The Case of Nigeria listed firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, (14)16-28.
[47]	Kamardin, H., & Haron H. (2011). Roles of Board of Directors: Monitoring and resource dependency perspectives from Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Ac-counting, 2(3), 282 – 306.
[48]	Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., &Mehran, A. (2000). Top manage-ment: Team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science, 2(1), 21 – 34.
[49]	Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure 1.Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275 – 304.
[50]	Letendre, L. (2004). The Dynamics of the boardroom.Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 101- 104.
[51]	Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance, Business Lawyer, 48( 1), 59-77.
[52]	Lu¨ckerath-Rovers, M. (2010). A comparison of gender diversity in the corporate governance Codes of France, Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Available at SSRN: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1585280,
[53]	Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2010), Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. Discussion paper, University of Utrecht, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht, Janu-ary.
[54]	Mclntyre, M. L., Murphy, S. A., & Mitehell, P.(2007).The top team examining board composition and firm performance, corporate governance. The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 7(5), 547-561.
[55]	Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293 – 315.
[56]	Minguez-Vera, A., Martin, A. (2011). Gender and management on Spanish SME`s: An empirical analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 22(14), 2852-2873.
[57]	Nigerian Stock Exchange (2006). Fact books, various issues, Lagos Nige-ria.
[58]	Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411 – 438.
[59]	Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size, composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administra-tive Science Quarterly, (1972) 218 – 228.
[60]	Pi, L, Timme, S. (1993). Corporate control and bank efficiency.Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 515 – 30.
[61]	Ponnu, C. H. (2008). Cor-porate governance structure and the performance of Malaysia public listed companies. Interna-tional Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 217 – 230.
[62]	Randøy, T., Oxelheim, L., & Thomsen, S. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. Working Paper, Nordic Innovation Centre, Oslo, November.
[63]	Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 404 – 413.
[64]	Sanda, A. U, Mukaila, A. S & Garba, T. (2005): Corporate governance mechanisms and firm financial performance in Nigeria. AERC Research Paper, No 149.
[65]	Sebora,T. C. & Wakefield, M. W. (1998). Antecedents of conflicts over business issue in family firms. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 1, 2-18
[66]	Sekaran, U., Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.): John Wiley & Sons Ltd
[67]	Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). USA: Pearson Education Inc.
[68]	Tacheva, S. & Huse, M. (2006). Women directors and board task performance: Me-diating and moderating effects of board working style. Conference Paper presented at European Academy of Management, Oslo, Norway.
[69]	Ujunwa, A. (2012). Board characteristics and financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms. Corporate Governance, 12(5), 656 – 674.
[70]	Uwuigbe, O. R., Fakile, A. S. (2012). The effect of board size on financial performance of banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(20),260 – 267.
[71]	Wakefield, M.W., & Castillo, J. (2006). An exploration of firm performance factors in family business: Do families value only the “bottom line”. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 37 – 51.
[72]	Weisbach, M. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431 – 460.
[73]	Wilson, I. (2006). Regulatory and institutional challenges of corporate governance in Nigeria post banking consolidation. Nigeria Summit Group (NESG) Economic indicators, April – June 12(2) 1- 10.
[74]	Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. (4th ed.) USA Cengage Learning.
[75]	Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
[76]	Yermack, D. (2006). Board Members and Company Value. Financial Markets Portfoli Management, 20(1), 33–47

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Edem Okon Akpan, Noor Afza Amran. (2014). Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Edem Okon Akpan; Noor Afza Amran. Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. J. Finance Account. 2014, 2(3), 81-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Edem Okon Akpan, Noor Afza Amran. Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. J Finance Account. 2014;2(3):81-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17,
  author = {Edem Okon Akpan and Noor Afza Amran},
  title = {Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria},
  journal = {Journal of Finance and Accounting},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {81-89},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfa.20140203.17},
  abstract = {This study examines the relationship between board characteristics and company performance (measured by turnover) in Nigeria. The study uses multiple regression technique on 90 sampled firms from the main board of Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2012. The empirical evidence shows that board size and board education are positively and significantly related to company performance. While there is no relationship between board equity, board independence, and board age. Also, this study evidences a negative significant between board women and turnover. Their appointment is window dressing as the percentage is too small for meaningful positive effect on company performance. Based on this finding, the study recommends legislation mandating companies listed on Nigerian Stock Exchange to appoint at least 30 to 35% of women on the board of directors.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria
AU  - Edem Okon Akpan
AU  - Noor Afza Amran
Y1  - 2014/06/20
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
T2  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JF  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JO  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
SP  - 81
EP  - 89
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7323
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
AB  - This study examines the relationship between board characteristics and company performance (measured by turnover) in Nigeria. The study uses multiple regression technique on 90 sampled firms from the main board of Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2012. The empirical evidence shows that board size and board education are positively and significantly related to company performance. While there is no relationship between board equity, board independence, and board age. Also, this study evidences a negative significant between board women and turnover. Their appointment is window dressing as the percentage is too small for meaningful positive effect on company performance. Based on this finding, the study recommends legislation mandating companies listed on Nigerian Stock Exchange to appoint at least 30 to 35% of women on the board of directors.
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Edem Okon Akpan

Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok Kedah, Malaysia
Noor Afza Amran

School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok Kedah, Malaysia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Edem Okon Akpan, Noor Afza Amran. (2014). Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Edem Okon Akpan; Noor Afza Amran. Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. J. Finance Account. 2014, 2(3), 81-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Edem Okon Akpan, Noor Afza Amran. Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. J Finance Account. 2014;2(3):81-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17,
  author = {Edem Okon Akpan and Noor Afza Amran},
  title = {Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria},
  journal = {Journal of Finance and Accounting},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {81-89},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfa.20140203.17},
  abstract = {This study examines the relationship between board characteristics and company performance (measured by turnover) in Nigeria. The study uses multiple regression technique on 90 sampled firms from the main board of Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2012. The empirical evidence shows that board size and board education are positively and significantly related to company performance. While there is no relationship between board equity, board independence, and board age. Also, this study evidences a negative significant between board women and turnover. Their appointment is window dressing as the percentage is too small for meaningful positive effect on company performance. Based on this finding, the study recommends legislation mandating companies listed on Nigerian Stock Exchange to appoint at least 30 to 35% of women on the board of directors.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria
AU  - Edem Okon Akpan
AU  - Noor Afza Amran
Y1  - 2014/06/20
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
T2  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JF  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JO  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
SP  - 81
EP  - 89
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7323
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
AB  - This study examines the relationship between board characteristics and company performance (measured by turnover) in Nigeria. The study uses multiple regression technique on 90 sampled firms from the main board of Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2012. The empirical evidence shows that board size and board education are positively and significantly related to company performance. While there is no relationship between board equity, board independence, and board age. Also, this study evidences a negative significant between board women and turnover. Their appointment is window dressing as the percentage is too small for meaningful positive effect on company performance. Based on this finding, the study recommends legislation mandating companies listed on Nigerian Stock Exchange to appoint at least 30 to 35% of women on the board of directors.
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download