The Relationship Between Forensic Accountants’ Skepticism and Audit Expectation Gap Among Nigerian Money Deposit Banks
This paper examines how forensic Accountant's skepticism can narrow audit expectation gap among Nigeria Money Deposit Banks. The specific objectives of the study were to determine the relationship between forensic Accountants' investigation tenure and lack of time budget pressure by forensic Accountant among Nigeria Money Deposit Bank. Two hypotheses were formulated and tested. A survey design was used to gather the information needed to achieve the objectives. A census was carried out in twenty one Nigeria Money Deposit Banks which had operating licenses from the Central bank of Nigeria. Open ended and closed ended questionnaires were used to collect the data. The findings of the study revealed that there was a strong negative linear relationship between the independent variables and dependent variable. Based on the findings, it was recommended that there is need to establish and structure necessary legal framework for forensic accounting and investigation and legislate forensic audit as in the case of financial audit legislated.
Odelabu Adedire Temitope,
The Relationship Between Forensic Accountants’ Skepticism and Audit Expectation Gap Among Nigerian Money Deposit Banks, Journal of Finance and Accounting.
Vol. 4, No. 1,
2016, pp. 9-17.
Adeyemi, S. B. and Okpala, O. (2011). The Impact of Audit Independence on Financial Reporting: Evidence From Nigeria. Business and Management Review. Vol. 1 (4): 9-25, June.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2015). Attitude-behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes. In. European Review of Social Psychology, pp. 426-435.
Andrew, H. (2003), Corporate financial reporting: theory and practice, SAGE Publication, London.
Ariff, M. K. & Rosmaini, S. (2005), An empirical study on the effects of undergraduate auditing course in reducing auditing expectation gap at University Tenegal Nasional (UNTEN), Paper Presented at AAAA Conference
Auditing Practices Board (APB). 2010. Auditor Skepticism: Raising the Bar. Discussion Paper. London: Auditing Practices Board (UK).
Bamber, E. M. and V. M. Iyer. 2007. Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 25 (2): 1-24.
Bazerman, M., K. Morgan and G. Lowenstein. 1997. The impossibility of auditor independence. Sloan Management Review. Vol. 38 (4): 89-94.
Beeler, J. D. and J. E. Hunton. 2002. Contingent economic rents: Insidious threats to audit independence. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research. Vol. 5: 21-50.
Bell, T., M. Peecher, and H. Thomas. 2005. The 21st Century Public Company Audit. New York, NY: KPMG LLP.
Bonner, S. E., Z. Palmrose and S. M. Young. 1998. Fraud type and auditor litigation: an analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases. The Accounting Review. Vol. 73 (4): 503-532.
Boritz, J. E., Gabor, B. J. & Lemon, W. M. (1987), An experimental study of review of preliminary audit strategies by external auditors, Canadian Academic Accounting Association, Canada.
Breusch, T. S.; Pagan, A. R. (1979)."A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation". Econometrical 47 (5): 1287–1294. JSTOR 1911963.
Casterella, J., W. R. Knechel, and P. L. Walker. 2004. The relationship of audit failures and auditor tenure. Working Paper, University of Florida.
Chung, H. and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, non-audit services and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review. Vol. 78 (4): 931-955.
Commission on Auditors’ Responsibilities (Cohen Commission) (1978), Report, conclusions and recommendations, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York.
Cosserat, G. W. and N. Rodda (2009), Modern auditing, 3th ed., John Wiley & Sons Ltd Dixon, R., Woodhead, A. D. & Sohliman (2006). An investigation of the expectation gap in Egypt, Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 3: 293-302.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M. & Tobin, J. 2002, ‘An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 312- 43.
Elder, R. J., M. S Beasley, and A. A. Arens (2010), Auditing and assurance services: an integrated approach: global edition, 13th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Fadzly, M. N. & Ahmad, Z. (2004), Audit expectation gap: the case of Malaysia, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 19, No. 17, pp. 897-915.
Farrar D. E. and Glauber R. R. (1967). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: The problem revisited. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 92-107.
Folger, R. and R. Cropanzano. 2001. “Fairness Theory: Justice as Accountability.” In Advances in organizational justice, edited by J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano, 89-118. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Garson, D. G. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions. Asheboro: Statistical Associates Publishing Blue Book Series
Geiger, Marshall A. and Raghunandan, Kannan, Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 21, No. 1, March 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=276695
Iyer, V. and D. Rama 2004.; Clients’ Expectations on Audit Judgments: A Note . Behavioral Research in Accounting, 16: 63-74.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A global perspective: (7th ed.)Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Hurtt, R. K., M. Eining, and R. D. Plumlee. 2008. An experimental examination of professional skepticism. Working paper, Baylor University.
Koh, H. & Woo, E. (1998), The expectation gap in auditing, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 147-154. Available at http://www.rackerspel.se/ upload-files/P147.pdf viewed 10th August, 2011.
Katou, A. A. (2008). Measuring the impact of HRM on organizational performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2, 119-142.
Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2nd ed.). New York.
Lee, T. H. & Azham, M. A. (2008), The audit expectation gap: A review of contributing factors. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, Vol. 4, No 8 (39), 30-36 Aug.
Libby, R, & Frederick, D. M. (1990). Experience and the ability to explain audit findings. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(2), 348 – 367.
Liggio, C. D. (1974), The expectation gap: the accountant’s waterloo, Journal of Contemporary Business, Vol. 3, Spring, pp. 27-44.
Lin, Z. and Chen, J. (2004), Auditors responsibility and independence: Evidence from China, Research in Accounting Regulation, Vol. 17.
Monroe, G. S. & Woodliff, D. R. (1994), An empirical investigation of the audit expectation gap: Australia evidence Accounting and Finance, Vol. 34, May, pp. 47-74.
Mugenda O. M., & Mugenda, A. G., (2008), Research Methods, Nairobi, McMillan Publishers.
Murphy, P. & Maynard, M. L. (1996), Using judgment profiles to compare advertising agencies’ and clints’ campaign values, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol 36, No 2, 19-27.
Nelson, M. W. 2009. A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 28 (3): 1-34.
Okaro, S. C. (2009), Bridging the audit expectation gap: The perception of ICAN members, Unpublished M. Sc research project, submitted to the Department of Accountancy, University of Nigeria, Enugu campus. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1730705.
O’Brie O'Brien. M, (2007). A caution regarding rules of the thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673-690.
Orodh Orodho A. J, (2003). Essentials of educational and social science research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Nairobi Acts Press.
Osborne, J. W., Christensen, W. R., & Gunter, J. (April, 2001). Educational Psychology from a Statistician’s Perspective: A Review of the Power and Goodness of Educational Psychology Research. Paper presented at the national meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.
Owojori, A. A. and Asaolu, T. O. (2009), “The Role of Forensic Accountant in Solving the Vexed Problem of Corporate World,” European Journal of Scientific Research, Volume 29, No. 2, pp. 183-187.
Peecher, M. E. 1996. The influence of auditors’ justification processes on their decisions: a cognitive model and experimental evidence. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 34 (1): 125-140.
Porter, B. & Gowthorpe, C. (2004), The audit expectation-performance gap in the United Kingdom in 1999 and comparison with the gap in New Zealand in 1989 and in 1999, Scotland.
Available at http://www.icas-org.uk/site/cms/download/res-porta viewed 10th August, 2011. Scotland: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Rabinowitz, A. M. (1996), Rebuilding public confidence in auditors and organizational controls, CPA Journal, Vol. 66, January, pp. 30-4.
Rennie, M. D., L. S. Kopp and W. M. Lemon. 2010. Exploring trust and the auditor-client relationship: factors influencing the auditor’s trust of a client representative. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 29 (1): 279-293.
Schelluch, P. and G. Gay (2006), Assurance provided by auditors’ reports on prospective financial information: implications for the expectation gap, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 653-676.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2000. Final Rule: Revision of the Commission’s Auditor Independence Requirements. Washington, D. C.
Siddiqui, J., & Nasreen, T. (2004), Audit expectation gap in Bangladesh: Perceptual differences between accounting professionals and students, June, http://ssrn.com/abstract=557542.
Sikka P, Puxty, A., Willmott, H. & Cooper, C. (1998), The impossibility of eliminating the expectations gap: Some theory and evidence’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9, pp. 299-330.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Trauth, E. M., Farwell, D. W. & Lee, D.(1993), The IS expectation gap: Industry expectations versus academic preparation, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, 47-72.
Turner, C. W. 2001. Accountability demands and the auditor’s evidence search strategy: The influence of reviewer preferences and the nature of the response (belief vs. action). Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 39 (3): 683-706.