| Peer-Reviewed

Personal Income Tax and Infrastructural Development in Lagos State, Nigeria

Received: 30 September 2020    Accepted: 26 October 2020    Published: 23 November 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Infrastructural provisions and availability of resources to meet such needs has been the major point of concern to government in all states of the federation. In recent time Lagos State has been witnessing infrastructural deficit and this is actually affecting the standard of living of the citizens. Since the advent of civilian government in the state, internally generated revenue has been on the increase, yet the state is still witnessing a lot of infrastructural deficits. This study examined the contributions of personal income tax to infrastructural development in Lagos state to determine the effect that personal income tax has on infrastructural provisions of the state. The study adopted ex-post facto research design. The study covered Personal Income Tax and infrastructures development of Lagos State from 1997 to 2018. Secondary data were obtained from Lagos State Internal Revenue Services (LIRS), Lagos State Ministry of budget and planning and Lagos State Ministry of Finance. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study found that Personal Income Tax has significant effect on infrastructural development of the state. Given infrastructural provisions; EDH, EDR. On EDH, With Adjusted R2= 0.150, F-stat =3.678, and also at 5% significance level [β = 0.380; P – value = 0.008]. On EDR, Adjusted R2 = 0.315, F-stat = 3.915, Prob (F-stat) = 0.028), at 5% significance level [β = 0.352; P – value = 0.154]. The study shows that more government income from PIT was spent on housing infrastructures over other infrastructural provisions.

Published in Journal of Finance and Accounting (Volume 8, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14
Page(s) 276-287
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Expenditure, Housing, Road, Development, Infrastructural Provisions, and Personal Income Tax

References
[1] Abdullahi, Z. (2016). Understanding Nigerian taxation; (2nd ed): Hussab Global Press Concepts Limited, Garki Abuja.
[2] Aguolu, O. (2004). Taxation and tax management in Nigeria. 3rd Edition, Meridan Associates, Enugu.
[3] Ahmed, M. (2015). Universities infrastructure and services: Concession Options Consideration and Methodologies. Retrieved from: www.unilorin.edu. ng. Accessed on August 15, 2019.
[4] Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33(6), 912–930. doi: 10.2307/2092683
[5] Agranoff, M., & McGuire, D. (2003). Collaborative public management and collaborative governance; conceptual similarities and differences. European journal of economic and political studies, 6(3).
[6] Babatunde, S. A. (2018). Government spending on infrastructure and economic growth in Nigeria. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 997-1014.
[7] Ben-Caleb E., Adeyemi K., & Iyoha, F. (2014). Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice, DOI: 10.5171/2014.207739.
[8] Ben-Caleb, E., Adeyemi, K., & Iyoha, F. (2018). The impact of budget reform on the quality of budget management in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research Practice 10(2), 23-38.
[9] Budg I T, (2018). Lagos State budget: Available from: http://www.budgetoffice.gov.ng/index.php/2017-approved budget?task=document.viewdoc&id=647. Accessed on: September 15, 2019.
[10] Chingoiro, S., & Mbulawa, S. (2016). Economic growth and infrastructure expenditure in Kenya: A Granger-Causality approach. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(9), 1–9.
[11] Cleave, E., & Arku, G. (2015). Place branding and economic development at the local level in Ontario. Canada. GeoJournal, 80(3), 323–338.
[12] Ebuh, G. U., Ezike, I. B., & Shittie, T. (2019). The infrastructure growth nexus in Nigeria. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 11(1), 41-58.
[13] Edogbanya, A., & Ja’afaru, G. S. (2013). Revenue generation: It’s Impact on Government Developmental Effort: A Study of Selected Local Council in Kogi East Senatorial District), Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 111(4), 211-215.
[14] European Commission, (2016). An investment plan for Europe. Bruxelles: European Commission Review, 18, 346-349.
[15] Fashola, B. R. (2009). My Fellow Citizens of Lagos State: Speech Delivered at the Inauguration and Fund Raising Ceremony of Eko Club (London) of Nigeria Official Gazette, Act 27 (86) Lagos.
[16] Fasoranti, M. M. (2016). The effect of government expenditure on infrastructure on the growth of the Nigerian economy, 1977–2009. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(4), 513–518.
[17] Floster, S., & Henrekson, M. (2018). Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries: European Economic Review, 45, 1501-1520.
[18] Hammerschmid, G., & Ysa, T. (2017). Empirical experiences in europe: National Varieties of a Global Concept. In; International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
[19] Hamzat K. O. (2016). Light rail; our plan is to move Lagosians around with Ease: available in www.osundefender.org (Retrieved on Tuesday March 12, 2019).
[20] Iheanacho, E. (2016). The contribution of government expenditure on economic growth of Nigeria disaggregated approach. International Journal of Economics & management sciences, 5(5), 1–9.
[21] Krueathep, W., Riccucci, N. M., & Suwanmala, C. (2010). Why do agencies work together? The determinants of network formation at the subnational level of government in Thailand. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 157–185. doi: 10.1093/jopart/ mun013
[22] Lawanson, T. (2007). Assessing smart infrastructure for sustainable urban development in Lagos metropolis. Journal of urban management, 5(2).
[23] O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52. doi: 10.2307/976691
[24] Obeng, W., & Whittal, J. (2014). Peri- urban infrastructure development through community Participation: A Case Study of Yasore, Ghana. Research Gate, 1-13.
[25] Ochiogu. A. C. (2014). Nigeria taxation for students, 5th ed; Ochiogu Publishers, Enugu.
[26] Ogbonna, G. N., & Appah, E. (2016). Effect of tax administration and revenue on economic growth in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. 7(13), 49-58.
[27] Omezi, G. (2018). Lagos City of concrete. In M. Gandy (Ed.), urban constellations. Berlin: Jovis Verlag GmbH. Geo Journal. 83(2), 257-274.
[28] Oshodi, L. (2010). Housing population and development in Lagos state.
[29] Owoputi, A. E. (2016). Road infrastructure and urban development in Akure, Nigeria: Performance Indices and Sustainable Development. The Planning Research Journal, 6(2), 26-35.
[30] Pfeffer, J,. & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organization; Resource dependency perspective. University of Illinois at urban-champaign’s academy for entrepreneurial leadership historical research reference in entrepreneurship
[31] Siyan, P., Eremionkhale, R., & Makwe, E. (2 0 1 5). The impact of road transportation infrastructure on economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 3 (1), 673-680..
[32] Skelcher, C., & Sullivan, H. (2008). Theory-driven approaches to analysing collaborative performance. Public Management Review, 10 (6), 751–771. doi: 10.1080/14719030802423103
[33] Taiwo, A., & Samson, O. (2015). Impact of tax reform on revenue generation in Lagos State. A time series approach. Research journal of finance and accounting 6(8)
[34] Usman, B. (2014). Infrastructural challenges to the Study of physics in tertiary institutions. JORIND 12(1) Pp 191-19 www.transcampus.org/journals; www.ajol.info/journals/jorind webometrics.org (2012). Retrieved on; May, 10 2019.
[35] Calderon C., & Servén, L. (2014). The effects of infrastructure development on growth and income. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration 6(2), 35-39.
[36] Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
[37] Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Resource dependence and interorganizational linkage among R&D labs: The impact of research orientations. The journal of high technology management research 4(2), 255-27.
[38] Edeh, A.,, & Chukwuani, V. (2017). Relevance of Tax Revenue Resources to Infrastructural Development of Nigeria. International journal of managerial studies and research, 5(11), 74-81.
[39] Paresh, K., & Seema, N. (2006). Government revenue and government expenditure nexus: evidence from developing countries. Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), 285-291.
[40] Tracy, M. & Kester, G. (2009). The causal relationship between government expenditure and tax revenue in Barbados. Presented at the Annual Review Seminar, Research Department Central Bank of Barbados, July: 27-30.
[41] Toda, H, Y,. & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes, Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, 66(1-2), 225-250.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Olugbade Julius Ade, Adegbie Folajimi Festus. (2020). Personal Income Tax and Infrastructural Development in Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(6), 276-287. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Olugbade Julius Ade; Adegbie Folajimi Festus. Personal Income Tax and Infrastructural Development in Lagos State, Nigeria. J. Finance Account. 2020, 8(6), 276-287. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Olugbade Julius Ade, Adegbie Folajimi Festus. Personal Income Tax and Infrastructural Development in Lagos State, Nigeria. J Finance Account. 2020;8(6):276-287. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14,
      author = {Olugbade Julius Ade and Adegbie Folajimi Festus},
      title = {Personal Income Tax and Infrastructural Development in Lagos State, Nigeria},
      journal = {Journal of Finance and Accounting},
      volume = {8},
      number = {6},
      pages = {276-287},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfa.20200806.14},
      abstract = {Infrastructural provisions and availability of resources to meet such needs has been the major point of concern to government in all states of the federation. In recent time Lagos State has been witnessing infrastructural deficit and this is actually affecting the standard of living of the citizens. Since the advent of civilian government in the state, internally generated revenue has been on the increase, yet the state is still witnessing a lot of infrastructural deficits. This study examined the contributions of personal income tax to infrastructural development in Lagos state to determine the effect that personal income tax has on infrastructural provisions of the state. The study adopted ex-post facto research design. The study covered Personal Income Tax and infrastructures development of Lagos State from 1997 to 2018. Secondary data were obtained from Lagos State Internal Revenue Services (LIRS), Lagos State Ministry of budget and planning and Lagos State Ministry of Finance. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study found that Personal Income Tax has significant effect on infrastructural development of the state. Given infrastructural provisions; EDH, EDR. On EDH, With Adjusted R2= 0.150, F-stat =3.678, and also at 5% significance level [β = 0.380; P – value = 0.008]. On EDR, Adjusted R2 = 0.315, F-stat = 3.915, Prob (F-stat) = 0.028), at 5% significance level [β = 0.352; P – value = 0.154]. The study shows that more government income from PIT was spent on housing infrastructures over other infrastructural provisions.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Personal Income Tax and Infrastructural Development in Lagos State, Nigeria
    AU  - Olugbade Julius Ade
    AU  - Adegbie Folajimi Festus
    Y1  - 2020/11/23
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14
    T2  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
    JF  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
    JO  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
    SP  - 276
    EP  - 287
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7323
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20200806.14
    AB  - Infrastructural provisions and availability of resources to meet such needs has been the major point of concern to government in all states of the federation. In recent time Lagos State has been witnessing infrastructural deficit and this is actually affecting the standard of living of the citizens. Since the advent of civilian government in the state, internally generated revenue has been on the increase, yet the state is still witnessing a lot of infrastructural deficits. This study examined the contributions of personal income tax to infrastructural development in Lagos state to determine the effect that personal income tax has on infrastructural provisions of the state. The study adopted ex-post facto research design. The study covered Personal Income Tax and infrastructures development of Lagos State from 1997 to 2018. Secondary data were obtained from Lagos State Internal Revenue Services (LIRS), Lagos State Ministry of budget and planning and Lagos State Ministry of Finance. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study found that Personal Income Tax has significant effect on infrastructural development of the state. Given infrastructural provisions; EDH, EDR. On EDH, With Adjusted R2= 0.150, F-stat =3.678, and also at 5% significance level [β = 0.380; P – value = 0.008]. On EDR, Adjusted R2 = 0.315, F-stat = 3.915, Prob (F-stat) = 0.028), at 5% significance level [β = 0.352; P – value = 0.154]. The study shows that more government income from PIT was spent on housing infrastructures over other infrastructural provisions.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Accounting, School of Management Science, Babcock University, Ilishan, Nigeria

  • Department of Accounting, School of Management Science, Babcock University, Ilishan, Nigeria

  • Sections