International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

| Peer-Reviewed |

The Balanced Budget Multiplier and Labour Intensity in Home Production

Received: 14 January 2015    Accepted: 17 January 2015    Published: 27 February 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This paper shows that the labour intensity of home production of a final consumption good affects national income and income multiplier effects of public expenditure financed by taxation. A reduction in labour intensity increases the level of national income but decreases the magnitude of the balanced budget multiplier effect. This result holds whether the tax instrument is distortionary or non-distortionary. It follows that the recent diffusion of labour-saving innovations such as washing machines and vacuum cleaners may have the effect of decreasing the effectiveness of fiscal policy.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15
Published in International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 3, Issue 2-1, April 2015)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments of Economic Theory and Its Applications

Page(s) 23-30
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Multiplier Effects, Public Expenditure, Taxation, Labour Intensity, and Home Production

References
[1] Becker, G. S. (1965) . ‘A Theory of the Allocation of Time’, Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
[2] Dixon, H. D. (1987). ‘A Simple Model of Imperfect Competition with Walrasian Features’, Oxford Economic Papers, 39, 134-160.
[3] Heijdra, B. J., Lighthart, J. E. and van der Ploeg, F. (1998). ‘Fiscal Policy, Distortionary Taxation, and Direct Crowding Out under Monopolistic Competition’, Oxford Economic Papers, 50, pp.79-88.
[4] Kleven, H. J. (2004). ‘Optimal Taxation and the Allocation of Time’, Journal of Public Economics, 88, pp. 545-557.
[5] Mankiw, N. G. (1988). ‘Imperfect Competition and the Keynesian Cross’, Economics Letters, 26, pp. 7-13.
[6] Molona, H. and Moutos, T. (1991). ‘A Note on Taxation, Imperfect Competition and the Balanced Budget Multiplier’, Oxford Economic Papers, 43, pp.68-74.
[7] Yoshida, M. and Turnbull, S. (2009). ‘Public Goods and the Technology of Consumption under Imperfect Competition’, mimeo.
Author Information
  • Faculty of Economics, Ryukoku University, 67, Fukakusa, Tsukamoto-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan

  • Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Masatoshi Yoshida, Stephen J. Turnbull. (2015). The Balanced Budget Multiplier and Labour Intensity in Home Production. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(2-1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Masatoshi Yoshida; Stephen J. Turnbull. The Balanced Budget Multiplier and Labour Intensity in Home Production. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2015, 3(2-1), 23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Masatoshi Yoshida, Stephen J. Turnbull. The Balanced Budget Multiplier and Labour Intensity in Home Production. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2015;3(2-1):23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15,
      author = {Masatoshi Yoshida and Stephen J. Turnbull},
      title = {The Balanced Budget Multiplier and Labour Intensity in Home Production},
      journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
      volume = {3},
      number = {2-1},
      pages = {23-30},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15},
      abstract = {This paper shows that the labour intensity of home production of a final consumption good affects national income and income multiplier effects of public expenditure financed by taxation. A reduction in labour intensity increases the level of national income but decreases the magnitude of the balanced budget multiplier effect. This result holds whether the tax instrument is distortionary or non-distortionary. It follows that the recent diffusion of labour-saving innovations such as washing machines and vacuum cleaners may have the effect of decreasing the effectiveness of fiscal policy.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Balanced Budget Multiplier and Labour Intensity in Home Production
    AU  - Masatoshi Yoshida
    AU  - Stephen J. Turnbull
    Y1  - 2015/02/27
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15
    T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    SP  - 23
    EP  - 30
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7616
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.s.2015030201.15
    AB  - This paper shows that the labour intensity of home production of a final consumption good affects national income and income multiplier effects of public expenditure financed by taxation. A reduction in labour intensity increases the level of national income but decreases the magnitude of the balanced budget multiplier effect. This result holds whether the tax instrument is distortionary or non-distortionary. It follows that the recent diffusion of labour-saving innovations such as washing machines and vacuum cleaners may have the effect of decreasing the effectiveness of fiscal policy.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 2-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections