To Manipulate or Not to Manipulate – A Short Comment on the Game of Interest Rate Manipulation
International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
Volume 1, Issue 1, February 2013, Pages: 21-24
Received: Dec. 11, 2012; Published: Feb. 20, 2013
Views 3027      Downloads 301
Andreas Haaker, Division of Fundamental Accounting Issues, DGRV – the German Cooperative and Raiffeisen Confederation Association, Berlin; Chair of Auditing, University of Hagen , Germany
Article Tools
Follow on us
In this paper, bankster reputation as a coordination mechanism (“focal arbitrator”) in the game of interest rate manipulation and the effects of punishment will be analyzed with the aid of game-theoretical instruments. In such a game with multiple equilibria, the “bad” to-manipulate equilibrium arises because of “bankster expectations”. Under this condition, the game can, in the short term, only be changed through penalties so that the not-to-manipulate strategy becomes the dominant one. Should it happen that the bankster reputation be destroyed in the long term, penalties would, once again, become superfluous, because the “good” not-to-manipulate equilibrium would appear even in self-interested actions, due to the good banker expectations.
LIBOR, Interest Rate Manipulation, Game Theory, Focal Point, Banksters
To cite this article
Andreas Haaker, To Manipulate or Not to Manipulate – A Short Comment on the Game of Interest Rate Manipulation, International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences. Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013, pp. 21-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20130101.13
Snider, Connan and Thomas Youle (2009), Diagnosing the LIBOR: Strategic Manipulation and Member Portfolio Positions, Working Paper (unpublished).
Abrantes-Metz, Rosa M. et al. (2009), „Libor manipulation?", Journal of Banking & Finance 36 (1), 136–150.
Ellis, David M. (2011), LIBOR Manipulation: A Brief Overview of the Debate, FTI UK London.
Siedenbiedel, Christian (2013), "Die Libor-Bande", Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, No. 21, 21-22.
Maisch, Michael (2013), "Der Libor ist ein Auslaufmodell", Handelsblatt, No. 10, 26.
Economist (2012), "Banksters", The Economist 404 (8792), 14.
Holler, Manfred J. and Gerhard Illing (2006), Einführung in die Spieltheorie, 6th ed., Springer, Berlin et al.
Myerson, Roger B. (1992), Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.
Schelling, Thomas C. (2010), "Game Theory: A Practitioner’s Approach", Economics and Philosophy 26 (1), 27-46.
Popper, Karl R. (2006), "Wie ich die Philosophie sehe", in: Popper, K. R., Alle Menschen sind Philosophen, 6th ed., Piper Verlag, München, 11-22.
Rubinstein, Ariel (1991), "Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory", Econometrica 59 (4), 909-924.
Haaker, Andreas (2012), Zur Manipulation von Referenzzinssätzen: Versuch einer einfachen spieltheoretischen Analyse des Grundproblems, Working Paper, Berlin (unpublished).
Böll, Sven et al. (2012), "Das Kartell", Der Spiegel, No. 31, 64-70.
Coase, Ronald H. (1960), "The Problem of Social Cost", Journal of Law and Economics 3 (Oct.), 1-44.
Schelling, Thomas C. (1960 [1980]), The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.
Myerson, Roger B. (2009), "Learning from Schelling’s Strategy of Conflict", Journal of Economic Literature 47 (4), 1109-1125.
Kirchgässner, Gebhard (2008), Homo Oeconomicus, 3rd ed., Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.
Harsanyi, John C. and Reinhard Selten (1988 [1992]), A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, The MIT Press, Cambridge and London.
Binmore, Ken (2007), Game Theory, Oxford University Press, New York.
Dixit, Avinash K. and Barry J. Nalebuff, (2010), The Art of Strategy, W. W. Norton & Company, New York and London.
Ludwig, Thomas (2012), "EU zeigt keine Toleranz für Zinsmanipulationen", Handelsblatt, No. 143, 27.
Hurwicz, Leonid (2008), "But Who Will Guard the Guardians?", American Economic Review 98 (3), 577-585.
Arnold, Volker (2009), "Vom Sollen zum Wollen – über neuere Entwicklungen in der Wirtschaftsordnung", Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 10 (3), 253-265.
Maisch, Michael (2013), "Blick zurück im Zorn", Handelsblatt, No. 30, 27.
The Wheatley Review (2012), The Wheatley Review of LIBOR: final report, September 2012.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186