Model of Organizational Processes Developed Within Companies in Order to Innovate through Technology Transfer
International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
Volume 1, Issue 4, August 2013, Pages: 196-204
Received: Jul. 1, 2013;
Published: Aug. 20, 2013
Views 3101 Downloads 135
Felicia Diana Nicoara, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Andreea Maier, The National Institute of Research and Development for Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Dorin Maier, The Faculty of Economics, University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Innovation is known as the basic condition for the sustainability, durability and competitiveness of a business. A company’s involvement in the technology transfer process together with a research organization that has an innovative scientific and technical outcome results is a real opportunity to innovate. For a successful innovation through technology transfer, the company should implement and carry out a number of specific organizational processes. As a result of a thorough literature review, this paper proposes a framework consisting of 17 processes, directly or indirectly subordinated to the innovation process through technology transfer. Based on their analysis, companies can establish their limits of competence and can allocate their resources effectively. Given that the company has a number of processes that cannot be implemented due to the lack of resources, managers may use the available resources of the partner research institution. Thus, the collaboration between the stakeholders participating in the technology transfer process is intended to result in an efficient use of available skills and resources, with a major influence on the outcome.
Felicia Diana Nicoara,
Model of Organizational Processes Developed Within Companies in Order to Innovate through Technology Transfer, International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences.
Vol. 1, No. 4,
2013, pp. 196-204.
T.O., Salge, A Vera,. (2009), Hospital innovativeness and organizational performance, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 34, Issue 1, pp. 54–67.
***, (2013), Sensgent Dictionary. Definition of innovation. Available on-line at http://dictionary.sensagent.com/innovation/en-en/
P., Heyne, P. J., Boettke, D. L., Prychitko, (2010), The Economic Way of Thinking. Prentice Hall, 12th ed. Pp. 163, 317–318.
G., Ferguson, (2008), Commercialisation Models. Unpublished. Available online at http://www.rumourcontrol.com.au/analysis/commercialisation_models.pdf;
G., Banusanu, F., Ionita, D., Savin, (2008), Theoretical and Applied Economics,The influence of the conjunctural factors toward the reengineering of organization. Vol. 10 ,pp 61-70.
Mitasiunas J., 2012, Innovation and Technology Transfer, BONITA project, available on line at http://www.bonita-project.eu/cms_uploads/files/a02innovationtech.pdf
***, (2013), Wikipedia, COREUS, White Paper, Improving the Execution of Strategy. Available at http://www.corpeum.com/assets/pdf/Improving_the_execution_of_strategy.pdf
J., Yencken, M., Gillin, 2002, Survey of University Spin-off Companies, Australia. Research Paper. Australian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia.
S., De Cleyn, J., Braet (2006), The evolution and performance of spin-off ventures: integration and elaboration of existing models, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
NIST, (2013), National Institute of Standards and Technology. A toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investments. Unpublished.
R. C., Cooper, E. J., Kleinschmidt (1988), Resource Allocation in the New Product Process. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 17, pg. 249-262.
APCTT, Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology, (2012), Tehnology Handbook, Available on line at. http://www.technology4sme.net/tech_handbook.aspx.
D., H., Hernard, D., M., Szymanski, (2001), Why some new product are more successful than Others. Journal of Marketing Research, vol 38, pg. 362-375.
S., Brad, C., Ciupan L., Pop B., Mocan, M., Fulea (2006), Basic manual of product manager and engineering innovation management. Editura Economică, Bucureşti 2006.
N., Maheran, M., C., Jantan Keong 2008, Technology Strategy and Firm Revenue Growth: Empirical Evidence of Malaysian Industrial Automation Industry, International Journal of Bussines and Management, Vol 3, Nr.7.
K., H., Vehkapera., H., Haapasalo, J., P., Rusanen, (2009), Analyisis of Technology Management Functions in Finnish High Tech Companies. The Open Management Journal, vol 2, pg. 1-10.
R., Sampson (2007), R&D Alliances and Firm Performance:the Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 50, No 2.
K., Ramanathan, (2012) An overview of Technology Transfer and Technology Transfer Models. Availeble on line at http://www.businessasia.net/Pdf_Pages/Guidebook
A., Krattinger, L., Mahoney, L., Nelsen, J., A., Thomson A., B., Bennett, K., Satyanarayana, G., D., Graff, C., Fernandez, S., P., Kowalski, (2007), Executive guide to Intelectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices. Disponibil on-line la www.ipHandbook.org.
A., L., Strenc (2011), Evaluation of the results of research and development R & D innovation intellectual property rights resulting from these activities for technology transfer. Romanian Journal of Industrial Property, nr. 1/2011.
E.M., Rogers (1995), The role of the research university in the spin-off of high technology companies, Technovation, no.4, pg 169-181.