The Arab Maghreb Union: the "Cost of Non Maghreb" and Sectoral Prospects
International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
Volume 1, Issue 6, December 2013, Pages: 285-291
Received: Aug. 30, 2013; Published: Oct. 20, 2013
Views 3323      Downloads 186
Adnen OUESLATI, PhD in Economics, Business and Economics University of Tunis
Riadh BRINI, PhD in Economics, Business and Economics University of Tunis
Article Tools
Follow on us
The aim of the paper is to find out the “No Maghreb” cost as untapped opportunities of intra regional trade and to check the existence of comparative advantages in the Maghreb region. We use panel data with gravity model to study the relationship between total exports and factors affecting them, as well as, the exports by sector and their determinants for a sample of 57 countries, between, 1980-2007. The goal is to point out the total exports potential as a proxy of the “No Maghreb” cost. The study also allows establishing whether there are comparative advantages among the region countries. The results show the weak level of intra regional trade comparing to its potential. They also demonstrate that Maghreb countries have similarities and disparities according to some comparative advantages. This contributes to encourage intra regional trade and improve trade perspectives in Maghreb.
Trade Integration, No Cost Maghreb, Comparative Advantage, Potential Commercial Model Gravity
To cite this article
Adnen OUESLATI, Riadh BRINI, The Arab Maghreb Union: the "Cost of Non Maghreb" and Sectoral Prospects, International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences. Vol. 1, No. 6, 2013, pp. 285-291. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20130106.14
Achy L (2007). Le commerce intra-régional : l’Afrique du Nord est-elle une exception. L'Année du Maghreb [En ligne], III | 2007, mis en ligne le 01 novembre 2010. URL :
Al-Atrash H, Youssef T., (1999), «Intra-Arab Trade : is it too little ? » IMF Working Papers, WP/00/10.
Anderson J., (1979), « A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation », American Economic Review, 69, pp. 106-116.
Banque Mondiale (2006), « Is the a new vision for Maghreb economic integrations? » volume I : Main Report, Social and economic Development group, Middle East and North Africa region, The World Bank
Breusch.T.S., Pagan.A.R., (1979), «A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation», Econometrica 47, pp1287–1294
Carey H.C., (1858), « Principles of Social Science », Philadelphia, J. Lippincott
Combes.P.F., thierry.M., Thisse.J.F., (2006), «Economie géographique: l'intégration des régions et des nations», Economica, Paris.
Eventt S.J., Keller W. (2002) "On theories explaining the success of gravity equation" Journal of Political Économy, vol. 110 (2), pp. 281-316.
Fontagné L, Pajot M, Pasteels J.M ., (2002), « Potentiels de commerce entre économies hétérogènes : un petit mode d’emploi des modèles de gravit » Économie et Prévision n° 152-153, pp 115 à 139.
Hausman J., (1978), « Specification tests in econometrics», Econometrica 46 (6), pp.1251–1271.
Hummels D., Levinsohn J., (1995), «Monopolistic competition and international trade: Reconsidering the Evidence», Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110 (3), pp. 799-836.
Kpodar K., (2007), «Manuel d'initiation à Stata (Version 8) », Centre D’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Développement International.
Miniesy R.S., Nugent J.B., et Yousef T.M., (2004), «Intra-regional trade integration in the Middle East. Past Performance and Future Potential» in H. Hakimian et J.B. Nugent (eds). Trade Policy and Economic Integration in the Middle East and North Africa. Economic Boundaries in Flux, Routledge, London.
Reilly W.J., (1931), « The law of retail gravitation », New York, Pilsbury.
Tinbergen J., (1962), « Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an International Economic Policy», New York, Twentieth Century Fund.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186