Study of Interactive Development Model of Producer Services and Manufacturing Industry Based on Symbiotic Theory
International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
Volume 4, Issue 5, October 2016, Pages: 292-297
Received: Oct. 13, 2016;
Published: Oct. 13, 2016
Views 3297 Downloads 145
Bohui Pang, Dongwu Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Although the relationship between producer services and manufacturing industry has become the focus, the related theoretical problem has been little investigated. From the perspective of symbiosis theory, this paper analyzes the interactive development model of producer services and manufacturing, and analyzes respectively the symbiosis organization mode and symbiotic behavior mode. The two symbiosis units exist eight symbiotic modes, and the characteristics of each symbiotic mode are given. In addition, the interaction stages of production service industry and manufacturing industry are divided into 4 stages, which include the infancy stage, growth stage, maturity stage and integration stage.
Study of Interactive Development Model of Producer Services and Manufacturing Industry Based on Symbiotic Theory, International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences.
Vol. 4, No. 5,
2016, pp. 292-297.
G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551.
Huang Qunhui, Li Xiaohua, “Chinese industrial development assessment and the 13th Five-Years" strategy,” China Industrial Economy, 2015 (9): 5-20.
Du Zhuying, He Laignag, “Manufacturing and producer services symbiotic behavior selection mechanism analysis,” Modern Commerce, 2007, (17): 21-22.
Nie Na, Wang Wupeng, Zhou Jing, “Symbiotic relationship between manufacturing companies and logistics service enterprises,” Academic Journal of Southeast University (Natural Sciences), 2007: 409-412.
Xu Xuejun, Feng Jilong, and He Laiang, “Manufacturing and producer services symbiosis mode based on transaction cost,” Science and Technology Management Research, 2007: (9): 171-181.
Hu Xiaopeng, Li Qingke, “Symbiotic relationship between producer services and manufacturing-- dynamic comparison with Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai based on input-output table,” Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2009, (2): 33-46.
Liu Hao and Yuan Yijun, “Symbiotic behavior patterns producer services and manufacturing in China,” Finance and Trade Research, 2010, 3: 54-59.
Liu Junyue, Li Junfeng and Zhong Sheng, “Research about symbiotic relationship between producer services and manufacturing ---- analysis based on coupling coordination degree of 31 provinces and cities in China,” Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2013 (16 ): 111-116.
Miao Lindong and Pan Wenqing, “Comparison with symbiotic relationship of three major growth poles between producer services and manufacturing in China,” Technical Economics, 2014 (33): 36-43.
Tien, James M., “Manufacturing and services: From mass production to mass customization,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2011, 20 (2): 129-154.