The Impact of Intrahousehold Resource Distribution on Woman’s Bargaining Power – A Collective Model Approach
International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
Volume 6, Issue 1, February 2018, Pages: 27-34
Received: Jan. 30, 2018; Accepted: Feb. 16, 2018; Published: Mar. 16, 2018
Views 1786      Downloads 115
Syed Ali, Department of Economics, Mulungushi University, Kabwe, Zambia
Bupe Simuchimba, Department of Economics, Mulungushi University, Kabwe, Zambia
Christabel Ngongola, Department of Economics, Mulungushi University, Kabwe, Zambia
Article Tools
Follow on us
This study was conducted in Kabwe city of Zambia during June to august 2017. The city was divided in to three zones – more developed, medium developed and backward. From each zone one area, i.e., Highridge, Katundo and Makululu, respectively, was selected. The purpose of study was to know the impact of intra-household resource distribution on woman’s bargaining power. Logit model was used to find out the relationship between dependent and independent variables. The study revealed positive impact of age and education on bargaining power of woman in the household. Asset ownership also had significant impact on the bargaining power of woman. The study recommended to constitute a new higher education policy to encourage women to pursue higher education and to reduce drop-outs. It is also recommended that the women should be made owners of assets in the household through legislation.
Bargaining Power, Education, Ownership of Assets, Gender-Based Violence, Autonomy to Travel Alone, Intra-Household Resource Allocation, Policy Intervention
To cite this article
Syed Ali, Bupe Simuchimba, Christabel Ngongola, The Impact of Intrahousehold Resource Distribution on Woman’s Bargaining Power – A Collective Model Approach, International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences. Vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 27-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20180601.15
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fuwa, N.; Shahidur, R.; Andrew, D.; and Tara Vishwanath (2000): “Intra-household Analysis”. In Designing Household survey Questionnaire for Developing Countries: Lessons from 15 years of the Living Standard Measurement Study, ed. Margaret Grosh and Paul Glewwe, Vol. 2, Washington, D. C: World Bank.
Haddad, L. and Kanbur, R. (1990): “How serious is the Neglect of Intra-household Inequality?” Economic Journal 100, No. 402; 866-81.
Kabeer, N. (1991): Gender, Production and Well-being: Rethinking the household Economy, IDS Discussion Paper 288, Institute of Development Studies, England.
Becker, G. S. (1965): A Theory of Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal, 79 (299): 493-517.
Alderman, H.; Pierre-Andre C.; Lawrence H.; John H. and Ravi K.(1995): “Unitary Versus Collective Models of the Household: Is it time to shift the Burden of Proof?” World Bank Research Observer 10, No. 1, 1-19..
Mc. Elroy, M. B., and Horney, M. J. (1981): Nash-bargained Household Decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of Demand. International Economic Review 22 (2): 333-349.
Mansa, M., and Brown, M. (1980): Marriage and Household Decision-making. A Bargaining Analysis. International Economic Review, 21 (1): 31-44.
Lundberg, S. J., Pollak, R. A., and Wales, T. J. (1997): Do Husbands and Wives Pool their Resources? Evidence from the U.K. child benefit. Journal of Human Resources, 32 (3): 463-480.
Chiappori, P. (1988): “Rational Household Labor supply”. Econometrica 56, No. 1: 63-89.
Browning, M; Francois B.; Pierre-Andre C., and Valerie, L. (1994): “Income and Outcomes: a structural Model of Intra-household allocation.”. Journal of Political Economy, 102, No. 6: 1067-96.
Quisumbing, A. R., and Maluccio, J. A. (2003): Resources at Marriage and Intra-household allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65 (3): 283-327.
Bilisuma, B. D. (2011): Essays on Women’s Bargaining Power and Intra-household resource allocation in Rural Ethiopia. International Institute of social Studies, Netherlands.
Kabeer, N. (1999): Resources, Agency, Achievement: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment, Development and Change 30 (3), 435-464.
Dercon, S. (2002): Income Risk, Coping Strategies and Safety Nets; The World Bank Economic Observer 17 (2): 141-166.
Duflo, E. (2003): Grandmothers and Granddaughters: Old Age Pension and Intra-household Allocation in South Africa. World bank Economic Review, 17, (1): 1-25.
Doss, C. (1997): The Effects of Woman’s Bargaining Power on Household Health and Education Outcomes: Evidence from Ghana: Paper Presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, March 27-29, Washington D. C.
Beegle, K., Frankengerg, E. and Thomas, D. (2000): Bargaining power within couples and Use of Pre-natal and Delivery care in Indonesia: Studies in Family Planning, 32, (2): 130-146.
Schuler, S. R., Hashmi, S. M and Riley, A. P. (1997): The Influence of Women’s Changing Roles and Status in Bangladesh’s Fertility Transition: Evidence from a Study of Credit Program and Contraceptive use, World Development, 25 (4): 563-575.
Kirigia, J; Sambo, L., Nganda, B., Mwaba, G., Chatora, R., and Mwase, t. (2005): Determinants of Health Insurance Ownership among South African Women, BMC Health Series Research, 5 (17).
Adair, L. (1991): Weight for Height and Body Mass Index in Non-pregnant women. In K. Krasovec and M. A. Anderson (eds.), Maternal Nutrition and Pregnancy outcomes, Washington D. C, Pan American Organization.
Jejobhoy, S. J. (1995): Women’s Education, Autonomy and reproduction Behavior; Experience from Developing countries, Oxford, England, Clarendon Press.
Wolff, B., Blank, A. K and Gage, A. G. (2000): Who decides? A Woman’s Status and Negotiation of Sex in Uganda. Culture, Health and Sexuality 2 (3), 303-322.
Ute F., Antonia G., and Franzisha H. (2017): Intra-household decision making and Long-term Welfare Effects: New Empirical Evidence.
Ashraf, N. (2009): Spousal Control and Intra-household Decision Making: An experimental study in the Phillippines. American Economic Review, 99 (4): 1245-1277.
Doss, C. (2011): Intra-household Bargaining and resource allocation in Developing countries. Jackson Institute for Global world development Report 2012. Gender Equality and Development.
Allendorf, K. (2007): Do Women’s Land Rights Promote Empowerment and Child Health in Nepal, World Development, Elsevier, 35 (11), 1975-88.
Mabsout., R., and Irene Van, S. (2010): Disentangling bargaining Power from Individual and Household level of Institutions: Evidence on Women’s position in Ethiopia, World Development 38 (5): 783-796.
Panda, P. and Agarwal, B. (2005): Marital Violence, Human Development and Women’s Property Status in India, World Development, 33 (5): 823-850..
Friedman-Sanchez, G. (2006): Assets in Intra-household of Bargaining Among Cut-flower Workers in Colombia, Feminist Economics, 12, (1-2): 247-269.
Wu, Xiaoyu and Lixing, Li. (2011): Gender of Children, Bargaining Power and Intra-household Resource Allocation in China. Journal of Human resources 46 (2), 295-316.
Agarwal, Bina (1994): A Field of One’s Own. Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quisumbing, A. R. and Maluccio, J. A. (2000): Intra-household Allocation and gender relations: New Empirical evidence from four Developing Countries. Washington, D. C. International Food Policy research Institute.
Datta, N. (2006): ‘Joint Titling – a Win-Win Policy? Gender and Property Rights in Urban Informal settlements in Chandigarh, India’. Feminist Economics 12 (1), pp. 271-298.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186