The Influence of the Balanced Score Card on Performance of Public Sector Organizations in Kenya
Science Journal of Business and Management
Volume 3, Issue 5, October 2015, Pages: 150-156
Received: Jul. 14, 2015; Accepted: Jul. 25, 2015; Published: Aug. 6, 2015
Views 4999      Downloads 172
Zipporah Karimi Muiruri, Department of Business Administration, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
James Kilika, Department of Business Administration, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
Article Tools
Follow on us
The Balanced Score Card model has proved to be an efficient strategic management tool over the years since its development in the early 90s. More and more private sector organizations have adopted its use though public sector pace of its adoption in measuring performance has been slow. The model has been presented on the support of four dimensions that offer a holistic approach for the implementation of organizational strategies so as to balance the concerns of diverse stakeholders to firm performance. The study was therefore designed to establish the extent to which these dimensions have been implemented in some selected public sector organizations in Kenya and how they are likely to explain variation in the performance of the organizations. The study identified four objectives and relevant hypotheses relating each dimension of the BSC with performance of the public sector organizations. The study adopted a descriptive research survey design and drew its population from all state owned corporations in the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum. The respondents were classified into two categories namely officers in charge of performance contracting and heads of departments namely; ICT, Human Resource Management, Finance and Customer service. The researchers used a questionnaire which was designated for the Heads of Departments and for the officers in charge of performance contract exercise too. The descriptive results indicated that Financial, Internal Business Process and Customer Focus were rated relatively high (mean = 1.892, s.d.= 0.7047; mean= 2.088, s.d.= 0.728; mean=2.022, 0.6821 respectively). Innovation and learning, however was rated low (mean= 2.892, 0.8422) and Organizational performance was rated at the level of moderate (mean= 3.32, s.d.= 1.0961). The four dimensions explain 71.5% variation of the performance. The four dimensions significantly predict the performance of the public sector organizations in Kenya. The results indicated a strong relationship between the dependent and independent variables where R2 was 71.5%. The study concluded that the balanced scorecard is not only a measurement system, but also a management tool for use by organizations to clarify their vision and strategy and their translation into goals and actions. The study called on the organizations sampled to carry out thorough capacity building on the application of BSC so that more stakeholders understand and internalize the concept in order to enhance its adoption.
Balanced Score Card, Finance Perspective, Internal Business Processes, Learning and Innovation, Customer Focus, Public Sector Organizations, Organizational Performance
To cite this article
Zipporah Karimi Muiruri, James Kilika, The Influence of the Balanced Score Card on Performance of Public Sector Organizations in Kenya, Science Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2015, pp. 150-156. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150305.13
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P., (1992). The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P., (2001b). The Strategy-focused Organization: Harvard Business School Press. Boston. MA.
World Bank (2004). Adjustment in Africa Reforms, Results and the Road ahead. Oxford University Press.
Rappaport, A., (1986). Creating Shareholder Value. New York: Free Press.
Stewart, F., (1991). Performance Measures: An application of Economic Value Added. International Journal of Business and Management. 3(3).
Brown, C., Reich, M., & Stern, D., (1993). Becoming a high performance work organization: the role of security, employee involvement and training. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(2).
Barsky, N.P. & Bremser, W.G., (1999). Performance measurement, budgeting and strategic implementation in the multinational enterprise. Managerial Finance, 25(2).
Skyrme D.J., & Amidon D.M., (1998). New measures of success, Journal of Business Strategy, 19(1).
Hawawini T.L, & Viallet D.E., (1999). An appropriate Financial Perspective for a Balanced Scorecard. Southern African Business Review. Unisa Press. 11(2).
Sim, K.L, & Koh, H.C., (2001). Balanced Scorecard. A rising trend in strategic performance measurement, Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2).
Heery, E., & Noon, M., (2001). Dictionary of Human Resource Management. Balanced Scorecard. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P., (1996b). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press. Boston. MA.
Tarantino, David P., (2003). Physician executive Nuts and Bolts of Business. Using the Balanced ScoreCard as a performance management tool. 29(5).
Niven, P. R., (2003). Balanced scorecard: Step-by-step for government and nonprofit agencies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Garg, R.K. & Ma. J., (2005).Benchmarking culture and performance in Chinese organizations. Benchmarking, 12(3).
Law, C.C.H. & Ngai, E.W.T., (2007). ERP systems adoption; An exploratory study of the organizational factors and impacts of ERP success, Information & Management system, Strategy and Leadership, 33(3).
Banker, R.D., Chang, H. & Pizzini, M.J. 2004.The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy, Accounting Review, 79(1).
Garrison, R.H., Noreen, G.W., & Brewer, P.C., (2006). Managerial Accounting. 11th International Edition. NewYork. Mc Graw Hill.
Powell, T.C., (1992).Strategic Planning as Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal (13)7.
Frigo, M.L., & Litman, J., (2002). What is return driven strategy? Strategic Finance, 83(8).
Davison, L., (2001).Measuring Competitive Intelligence Effectiveness: Insights from the Advertising Industry. Competitive Intelligence Review, 12(4).
Weerawardena, J., (2003). The Role of Marketing Capability in Innovation Based Competitive Strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 11.
Figueriedo M., (2003). Adoptive Sparseness for Supervised Learning. IEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25 (9).
Kaplan, R.S., (1998). Innovation action research: creating new management theory and practice, Management Accounting Research, 10.
Yahya S., (2001). The Implementation of an ISO 9000 Quality System. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 18(9).
Bashah, S., (2002). Service Quality in local Banks. A Study on Bancassurance Customers. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.
Bungsu, N., (2004). Quality of Services and its Relationship with Customer Loyalty: Perceptions of Audit Clients. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang
Fletcher, C., (2004). Appraisal and Feedback: Making Performance Review Work.3rd Edition. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. London
Frigo, M.L., & Litman, J., (2002). What is return driven strategy? Strategic Finance, 83(8).
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2013)
Andy, N., Mike, K., & Veronica, M.,(2013). Does the BSC work: An empirical investigation. Centre for business performance. Cranfield school of management; Bedfordshire, MK43. OAK, UK.
Barbara, B, & Eleonora, B., (2010). Performance measurement in the food supply chain; A BSC Approach. University of Parma, Parma, Italy. 28(56).
Sanjoy B, & Keith T., (2007). Applying the Balanced Scorecard for better performance of Intellectual Capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4).
Stephen N.M. Nsuve., & Gabriel Nyaoga. Application of Balanced Score Card performance measurement at Essar Telecom Kenya Limited. 2231330.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186