Research on the Performance Evaluation System of Listed Companies in Financial Securities Industry
Science Journal of Business and Management
Volume 5, Issue 3, June 2017, Pages: 122-131
Received: Apr. 7, 2017; Accepted: Apr. 24, 2017; Published: Jun. 14, 2017
Views 1837      Downloads 64
Cui Zhe, School of Business, Nantong University, Nantong, China
Zhou Jiahui, School of Business, Nantong University, Nantong, China
Wang Guohua, School of Business, Nantong University, Nantong, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
With the rapid development of Chinese domestic economy, the listed companies affected by various internal and external factors is gradually deepened, so as to continuously improve the management level, more attention is paid to risk management gradually. To improve the operating performance of listed companies in China is not only the objective needs of their own development, but also the practical needs to deal with international challenges and competition. Firstly, the theory was introduced, and then constructing China's securities within the listed company's operating performance evaluation system through relevant empirical research, that single indicators to evaluate the performance of listed securities companies often have limitations, because in the financial system is the perfect indicator not exist, there are no indicators of the single and objects, can not be fully present financial position. As listed securities company performance is affected by many factors, it is necessary to establish a comprehensive evaluation model to the performance of listed securities companies to make a comprehensive and objective evaluation. Evaluation model established in this paper is a discussion to the performance of listed securities company comprehensive evaluation.
Listed Company, Performance Evaluation, Evaluation System
To cite this article
Cui Zhe, Zhou Jiahui, Wang Guohua, Research on the Performance Evaluation System of Listed Companies in Financial Securities Industry, Science Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2017, pp. 122-131. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20170503.16
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Wruck K. H. Equity Ownership Concentration and Firm Value: Evidence from Private Equity Financings [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989 (25).
Dodd P. Merger proposals management discretion and stockholder wealth [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1980, 8 (2).
Chen S., HoK. W., Lee C., Yeo G. Wealth Effects of Private equity Placements evidence from Singapore [J]. The Financial Review, 2002 (37).
Healy P. M., Palepu K. G. and Ruback R. S. Do mergers improve corporate performance? [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1992, 31 (2).
Hertzel Michael G., James S. L and Wintoki M. B. Institutional Investors and the Long-run Performance of Private Placement [J]. Journal of Finance, 2006 (48).
Philippe Hertenstein. Finaneial Risk Manage Handbook, Johnwiley & sons, Ine, 2000.
Farrell M J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1957.
Altman E. Corporate FinanCial Distress. New York University Warking PaPer, 1983.
West. West R. C. A Faetor-analysis Approach to Bank Condition, Journal of Banking Finance, 1985, (9).
Arshadi, E. C. Lawrenee. An Empirieal Investigation of New Bank Perform-ance, Journal of Banking and Finance, 1987.
Joseph F Sinkey, Commercial bank Financial management [M], 2002.
Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton. The Strategy - Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Envir-onment [M]. Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
James M. Conway. Analysis and design of mutifactor -performance Appraisal studies. Journal of management, 1996, 1 (22): 139-152.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186