Science Journal of Business and Management

| Peer-Reviewed |

International Capital Mobility and Saving-Investment Nexus in Nigeria: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis

Received: 14 May 2015    Accepted: 01 June 2015    Published: 25 July 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This paper tests the validity of Feldstein-Horioka (1980) hypothesis using Nigerian data from 1980 to 2013 by relying on the ARDL Bounds testing approach to co-integration and vector error correction model (VECM). Evidence for the hypothesis over the sub-samples is mixed given absence of co-integrating relationship between savings and investment in both periods. Over the period of market-friendly economic reform (1986 -2013) and entire sample period (1980-2013), we found low saving investment correlation indicating support for the F-H hypothesis (that low saving investment relationship implies high degree of international capital mobility). Presumably, the World Bank and IMF designed economic reform programs in form of liberalization and deregulation – coupled with the neo-liberal economic management framework that Nigeria is currently practicing – may have attenuated the saving investment relation in the reform era, thereby providing support for F-H hypothesis over the reform era. But the finding of similar absence of cointegration between saving and investment in the pre-reform era, against the F-H postulate, reveals the importance of incorporating factors such as money supply and inflow of foreign capital that could affect the saving investment relationship as widely suggested in the literature. Overall, we find support for high degree of international capital mobility across Nigerian borders that may lead to unsustainable current account balance for the economy if left unregulated. The policy import of the paper is the need for a more conscientious implementation of a policy of guided deregulation of Nigeria’s capital and trade accounts.

DOI 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14
Published in Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 3, Issue 4, August 2015)
Page(s) 116-126
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Capital Mobility, F-H Hypothesis, ARDL Model, Nigeria, VECM, Bounds Test

References
[1] Artis, M. &Bayoumi, T. (1989).SavingsInvestment ,Financial Integration, and Balance of Payment , IMF Working PaperWP/89/102, Washington, D.C.
[2] Apergis, N., &Tsoulfidis,L. (1997). The Relationship Between Saving and Finance; Theory and Evidence from E. U. Countries. Research in Economics, 51, 333-358.
[3] Baxter, M. &Crucini, M. (1993).Explaining Saving-Investment Correlation, American Economic Review, 83, 416-36.
[4] Bayoumi,T. A. (1990). Saving-Investment Correlations. Immobile Capital, Government Policy, or Endogenous Behaviour?IMF staff Papers, 37 (2), 360-387.
[5] Bayoumi, T. A., & Rose, A. K. ( 1993). Domestic Saving and Intra-National Capital Flows. European Economic Review, 37 (6), 1197-1202.
[6] Caceres, L. R. (1985). ‘Saving in a Global Context’, In Saving and Development, D. Kessler and P. Ullmo (eds.) Paris: Economica.
[7] Caceres, L. R. (1997). Savings,InvestmentandCapitalMobility in El Salvador and Guatemala/Epargne. Giordano Dell-Amore Foundation, 21,(1), 19-34.
[8] Dooley, M.,Frankel, J., & Mathieson, D. (1987). International Capital Mobility: What Do Savings InvestmentCorrelation Tell Us. IMF Staff Papers, 34.
[9] De Vita, G and Abbott, A. (2002). Are Saving and Investment Cointegrated? An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Economics Letters, 77. 293-299.
[10] Feldstein, M., &Bachetta, P. (1990). National Saving and International Investment. In B. D. Berheim and J.B. Shoven (eds.), National Saving and Economic Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago.
[11] Feidstein, M., &Horioka. C. (1980). Domestic Savings and International Capital Flows. Economic Journal, 90.
[12] Frankel, J. (1991). Quantifying International Capital Mobility in the1990s, In National Savings and Economic Performance (B. D.Bernheim and J. B.Shoven, Eds.) NBER project report. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[13] Frankel, J. (1985). International Capital Mobility and Crowding-out in the US Economy: Imperfect Integration of Financial market or of Goods Markets? NBER Working PaperNo. 1773, December.
[14] Frankel, J., Dooley, M., &Matheison, D. (1986). International Capital Mobility in Developing Countries Vs. Industrial Countries: What do Savings Investment coreelation Tell Us. NBER Working Ppaer, 2043.
[15] Holmes, M. J. (2005). What do Savings-Investment Correlation tell us about International Capital Mobility of Less Developed Countries? Journal for Economic Integration, 20 (3), 590-603.
[16] Jansen, W. J. (1996). Estimating Savings-Investment Correlation: Evidence for OECD Countries Based on an Error Correction Model. Journal of International Money and Finance, 15 (3), 749-781.
[17] Johansen, S., &Juselius, K. (1990). “Maximum Likelihood Estimatiom and Inference on Cointegration: With Application to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52.
[18] Koskela, E., &Matti, V. (1991). Monetary Policy Reaction Functions and Saving-Investment Correlations: Some Cross-Country Evidence. WeltwirstchaftlichesArchiv, Band 127, No.3.
[19] Khundrakpam, J. K., &and Ranjan, R. (2010). Savings-Investment Nexus and International Capital Mobility in India: Revisiting Felstein-Horioka Hypothesis. Department of Economics, Dehli School of Economics, 45 (1), 49-66.
[20] Levy, D. (1995). Investment Savings Co-MovementUnder Endogenous Fiscal Policy. Open Economies Review, 6, (2).
[21] Miller, M. S. (1988). International Capital Mobility: What do Saving-Investment Correlations Tell Us? Comment on Dooley, Frankel, and Matheison, IMF Staff Papers, 35, 391-396.
[22] Murphy, R. G. (1984). Capital Mobility and the Relationship between Savings and Investment Rates in OECD Countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 3, 327-342.
[23] Narayan. P.K. (2005). The Relationship between Savings and Investment for Japan. Japan and World Economy, 17, 239-309.
[24] Nasiru, I., &Usman, H. M. (2013). The Relationship between Domestic Savings and Investment: The Felstein-Horioka Test Using Nigerian Data. Central Bank of Nigeria Journal of Applied Statistics, 4 (1), 75-88.
[25] Obstfeld. M. (1986). Capital Mobility in the World Economy; Theory Measurement,Carneigie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 24,55-104.
[26] Obstfeld. M. ,&Rogoff. K. (1995). The Inter-temporal Approach to the Current Account. NBER working paper, 4893.
[27] Penati. A. andDooley. M. (1984). Current Account Imbalances and Capital Formation in Industrial Countries: 1949-1981. IMF StaffPapers, 31; 1-24.
[28] Pesaran, M. H., &Pesaran, B. (1997).Microfit 4.0, England: OxfordUniversity Press.
[29] Persan. M. H.,& Shin. Y. (1999). An Autoregressive Distributive Lag Modeling Approachto Cointegration Analysis. InS. Storm, (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century, TheRagnar FrischCentennial Symposium,1-33, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[30] Persan. M. H., Shin, Y., &Smith, R. J. (2001), Bounds Testing Approaches to the analysis ofLevel Relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16: 289-326.
[31] Pollin, R. & Justice, C. (1994). Saving, Investment and Interest Rates: An Empirical Consideration of Some Basic Keynesian Propositions. In G. Dimsky, and R. Pollin (eds.), New Perspectives in Monetary Macroeconomics, Explorations in Tradition of Hyman P. Minsky, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[32] Tesar, L. (1991 ). Savings, Investment and International Capital Flows. Journal of International Economics, 31.
[33] Roubini, N. (1988). Current Account and Budget Deficit in an Inter-temporal Model of Consumption and taxation Smoothening:A Solution to the ‘Feldstein-HoriokaPuzzel’, Cambridge, NBER Working Paper Series.
[34] Sinha. D.,&Sinha. T. (2002), Saving-Investment Relationships for Japan and other Asian Countries.Japan and the World Economy, 14: 118-23.
[35] Sinha. D.,&Sinha. T. (2003). The Mother of all Puzzles Would not go Away. Economic Letters, 82: 259-67.
[36] Summer. L. H. (1991). Measuring International Capital Mobility: A Critical Assessment of the Use of Savings and Investment Correlations. The Kiel Institute of World Economics, Working paper No. 458.
[37] Taylor, M. P (1995). Economics of Exchange Rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 33 (1), 13-47
[38] Taylor, M. P., &Sarno, L. (1997). The Economics of Exchange Rates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[39] Taylor. M. A. (1996). International Capital Mobility in History: The Saving-Investment Relationship, NBER Working paper, 5743.
[40] Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington Consensus Means by Policy Reform, in J. Williamson (ed.), Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC, Institute for International Economics.
[41] Wong. D. (1990), What do Saving-InvestmentRelationship Tell Us About Capital Mobility ?Journal of International Money and Finance, 9: 60-74.
[42] Yamori. N. (1995). The Relationship between Domestic Savings and Investment:The Feldstein-Horioka Test using Japanese Regional Data. Economic Letters, 48: 361-366.
Author Information
  • Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria

  • Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Christopher N. Ekong, Kenneth U. Onye. (2015). International Capital Mobility and Saving-Investment Nexus in Nigeria: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis. Science Journal of Business and Management, 3(4), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Christopher N. Ekong; Kenneth U. Onye. International Capital Mobility and Saving-Investment Nexus in Nigeria: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2015, 3(4), 116-126. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Christopher N. Ekong, Kenneth U. Onye. International Capital Mobility and Saving-Investment Nexus in Nigeria: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis. Sci J Bus Manag. 2015;3(4):116-126. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14,
      author = {Christopher N. Ekong and Kenneth U. Onye},
      title = {International Capital Mobility and Saving-Investment Nexus in Nigeria: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis},
      journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
      volume = {3},
      number = {4},
      pages = {116-126},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20150304.14},
      abstract = {This paper tests the validity of Feldstein-Horioka (1980) hypothesis using Nigerian data from 1980 to 2013 by relying on the ARDL Bounds testing approach to co-integration and vector error correction model (VECM). Evidence for the hypothesis over the sub-samples is mixed given absence of co-integrating relationship between savings and investment in both periods. Over the period of market-friendly economic reform (1986 -2013) and entire sample period (1980-2013), we found low saving investment correlation indicating support for the F-H hypothesis (that low saving investment relationship implies high degree of international capital mobility). Presumably, the World Bank and IMF designed economic reform programs in form of liberalization and deregulation – coupled with the neo-liberal economic management framework that Nigeria is currently practicing – may have attenuated the saving investment relation in the reform era, thereby providing support for F-H hypothesis over the reform era. But the finding of similar absence of cointegration between saving and investment in the pre-reform era, against the F-H postulate, reveals the importance of incorporating factors such as money supply and inflow of foreign capital that could affect the saving investment relationship as widely suggested in the literature. Overall, we find support for high degree of international capital mobility across Nigerian borders that may lead to unsustainable current account balance for the economy if left unregulated. The policy import of the paper is the need for a more conscientious implementation of a policy of guided deregulation of Nigeria’s capital and trade accounts.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - International Capital Mobility and Saving-Investment Nexus in Nigeria: Revisiting Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis
    AU  - Christopher N. Ekong
    AU  - Kenneth U. Onye
    Y1  - 2015/07/25
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14
    T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
    JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
    JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
    SP  - 116
    EP  - 126
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0634
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150304.14
    AB  - This paper tests the validity of Feldstein-Horioka (1980) hypothesis using Nigerian data from 1980 to 2013 by relying on the ARDL Bounds testing approach to co-integration and vector error correction model (VECM). Evidence for the hypothesis over the sub-samples is mixed given absence of co-integrating relationship between savings and investment in both periods. Over the period of market-friendly economic reform (1986 -2013) and entire sample period (1980-2013), we found low saving investment correlation indicating support for the F-H hypothesis (that low saving investment relationship implies high degree of international capital mobility). Presumably, the World Bank and IMF designed economic reform programs in form of liberalization and deregulation – coupled with the neo-liberal economic management framework that Nigeria is currently practicing – may have attenuated the saving investment relation in the reform era, thereby providing support for F-H hypothesis over the reform era. But the finding of similar absence of cointegration between saving and investment in the pre-reform era, against the F-H postulate, reveals the importance of incorporating factors such as money supply and inflow of foreign capital that could affect the saving investment relationship as widely suggested in the literature. Overall, we find support for high degree of international capital mobility across Nigerian borders that may lead to unsustainable current account balance for the economy if left unregulated. The policy import of the paper is the need for a more conscientious implementation of a policy of guided deregulation of Nigeria’s capital and trade accounts.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections