LMX as a Predictor of Performance Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Life Insurance Sector of Pakistan
Journal of Human Resource Management
Volume 3, Issue 1, February 2015, Pages: 1-5
Received: Apr. 15, 2015; Accepted: Apr. 29, 2015; Published: May 11, 2015
Views 4374      Downloads 129
Authors
Abdul Saboor, Department of Management Sciences Superior University, Lahore Pakistan
Munazza Mukhtar, Department of Management Sciences Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore Pakistan
Muhammad Khurram Sadiq, Department of Management Sciences Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore Pakistan
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This study comprehensively evaluated the association between LMX and performance (Task performance, Contextual performance) behavior. Results are based upon a sample of 200 field staff at State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan. Sample was identified with snowball sampling method. Pearson coefficient of correlation and linear regression was utilized for data analysis. Results reveal that LMX have significant positive association with subordinates task and contextual performance behavior. Study is novel in its sense, and strengthens the prior research as well.
Keywords
LMX, Task Performance, Contextual Performance, Behavior
To cite this article
Abdul Saboor, Munazza Mukhtar, Muhammad Khurram Sadiq, LMX as a Predictor of Performance Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Life Insurance Sector of Pakistan, Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20150301.11
References
[1]
Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2000). Performance management. Human Resource Management, 69-84.
[2]
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human performance, 10(2), 99-109.
[3]
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. Personnel selection in organizations, 3570.
[4]
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 90(6), 1241.
[5]
Dansereau, A. E. (1973). The invisible organization. ProQuest Information & Learning.
[6]
Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(1), 46-78.
[7]
Devonish, D., & Greenidge, D. (2010). The Effect of Organizational Justice on Contextual Performance, Counterproductive Work Behaviors, and Task Performance: Investigating the moderating role of ability‐based emotional intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 75-86.
[8]
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of management review, 11(3), 618-634.
[9]
Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management journal, 37(3), 499-521.
[10]
Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: The moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management journal, 49(2), 395-406.
[11]
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of applied psychology, 82(6), 827.
[12]
Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person–organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of vocational behavior, 55(2), 254-275.
[13]
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 269.
[14]
Jensen, J. L., Olberding, J. C., & Rodgers, R. (1997). THE QUALITY OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE (LMX) AND MEMBER PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
[15]
Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of applied psychology, 92(5), 1286.
[16]
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 87(1), 52.
[17]
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 662.
[18]
Michael, D. F., Harris, S. G., Giles, W. F., & Feild, H. S. (2005). THE INFLUENCE OF SUPPORTIVE SUPERVISOR COMMUNICATION ON LMX AND PERFORMANCE: THE TEST OF A THEORETICAL MODEL. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
[19]
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of applied psychology, 79(4), 475.
[20]
Motowildo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human performance, 10(2), 71-83.
[21]
Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S. A., & Laczo, R. M. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: Clarifying relations between the two domains. Human performance, 19(4), 441-464.
[22]
Scandura, T. A. (1999). Rethinking leader-member exchange: An organizational justice perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 25-40.
[23]
Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B., & Novak, M. A. (1986). When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader–member exchange and decision influence. Journal of applied psychology, 71(4), 579.
[24]
Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 63-113.
[25]
Scott, S. G., & Einstein, W. O. (2001). Strategic performance appraisal in team-based organizations: One size does not fit all. The Academy of management executive, 15(2), 107-116.
[26]
Sparrow, P. R., Chadrakumara, A., & Perera, N. (2010). Impact of work values and ethics on citizenship and task performance in local and foreign invested firms: A test in a developing country context.
[27]
Truckenbrodt, Y. B. (2000). The relationship between leader-member exchange and commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Acquisition Review Quarterly, 7(3), 233.
[28]
Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 526.
[29]
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 48(3), 420-432.
[30]
Werner, J. M. (2000). Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 3-24.
[31]
Zhi-wu, Z. (2008). Legal Definition of Performance and Performance Subject. Journal of Zhejiang Vocational Academy of Art, 3, 021.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186