Journal of Human Resource Management

| Peer-Reviewed |

An Effective Employee Retention Policies as a Way to Boost Organizational Performance

Received: 16 June 2019    Accepted: 03 July 2019    Published: 13 July 2019
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Several organizations in developing nations overlooked the most important elements determining employee retention as a strategy in achieving organizational outputs, making them to become victims of industry competition locally and internationally. The study was conducted to examine the factors that undermine employee retention in tertiary educational institutions in Sierra Leone. Good employee retention policies are crucial to the development of organizational success, as many organization view retaining talented and skillful employee as the basic foundation for reducing cost, and achieving organizational blueprint. Keeping the most talented employees will be the most engaged employees that know the cornerstone of the organization’s policies and operations. They are the main pillars of organization and to some extent, are willing to sacrifice themselves for the success of the organization. They worked tirelessly to attain organizational objectives. Therefore, much attention must be giving to them, more especially considering the factors that will motivate them to do their jobs excellently. They should be treated fairly and must be evaluated on the metrics that define employee retention strategies for organizational success. This is because the organization needs good employees for its day-to-day operations, and good employees make organization successful. Most organizations ensure that they retain the best employees by all means. Losing talented employee is catastrophic in terms of cost and others, making the cost to replace such employee quadrupling their salaries about 300%. Noting that the organization must have spent substantial amount of money on them, such as training, mentorship, scholarship, and other motivational schemes.

DOI 10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12
Published in Journal of Human Resource Management (Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2019)
Page(s) 41-48
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Employee Retention, Reward, Compensation, Employee Retention

References
[1] Coff, R. W., (1997), “Human Assets and Management Di lemmas: Coping with Hazards on the Road to Resource- Based Theory”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 374-402.
[2] Cappelli, P. (2001), A market-driven approach to retaining talent, Harvard Business Review on Finding and Keeping the Best People, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 27-50.
[3] Cole, C. L. (2000). Building loyalty in Workforce, 42-47.
[4] Maguire, S. (1995). Learning to change. European quality. 2 (8): 23-28.
[5] Annand, K. N. (1997). Give success a chance. Quality progress. pp: 63-64.
[6] Walker J. W. (2001), Human Resource Planning, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 68.
[7] Aliya Ahmad and Shadab Fariduddin (2003). The motivation to work, Journal of business and organization development.
[8] Kehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities. The compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of management review.
[9] Eisenberger, R. F.-L. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of applied psychology, 75, 51-59.
[10] Greenhaus, J. H. and G. A. Callanan (1994). Career Management. The Dryden Press, Fort Worth, Texas.
[11] Roepke, R., Agarwal, R., et al. (2000). Aligning the IT Human Resource with Business Vision: The Leadership Initiative at 3M. MIS Quarterly 24 (2): 327-353.
[12] Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. Leadersh. Q., 19: 77-88.
[13] Smith, B. D. (2005). Job retention in child welfare: Effects of perceived organizational support, supervisor support, and intrinsic job value Children and Youth Services Rev., 27: 153-169.
[14] Khatri, N., Fern, C. T. & Budhwar, P. (2001). Explaining Employee Turnover in an Asian Context, Human Resource Management Journal, 11 (1), pp. 54-74.
[15] Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. & Barton, S. M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: a test of a structural assessment model sample of workers, The Social Science Journal, 38 (02), pp. 233-250.
[16] Singh, B. D. (2008). Industrial Relations: Emerging Paradigms. New Delhi: Naraina.
[17] Shaw, J. D., Delery, J. E., Jenkins, G. D. & Gupta, N. (1998). An Organization-level Analysis of Voluntary and Involuntary Turnover, Academy of Management Review, 41 (5), pp. 511-525.
[18] Labov, B. (1997). Inspiring employees the easy way, Incentive, 171 (10), pp. 114-118.
[19] Dobbs, K. (2001). Knowing how to keep your best and your brightest. Workforce, 21 (4), pp. 57-60.
[20] Alexander, J., Bloom, J. and Nichols, B. (1994). Nursing turnover and hospital efficiency: an organization-level analysis. Industrial Relations, 33 (4), pp. 505-520.
[21] Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 8, pp. 1-74.
[22] Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover, Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 51-89.
[23] Labov, B. (1997). Inspiring employees the easy way, Incentive, 171 (10), pp. 114-118.
[24] Ting, Y. (1997). Determinants of job satisfaction of federal government employees. Public Personnel Management, 26, pp. 313-334.
[25] House, R. J., Shane, S. A. and Herold, D. M. (1996). Rumours of the Death of Dispositional research are Vastly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21, pp. 203-224.
[26] Magner, N., Welker, R. & Johnson, G. (1996). The interactive effects of participation and outcome favorability in performance appraisal on turnover intentions and evaluations of supervisors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, pp. 135-143.
[27] Campion, S. M. A. (1991). Meaning and Measurement in Turnover: Comparison of Alternative Measures and Recommendations for Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, pp. 199-212.
[28] O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J. & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture. A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fir, Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 487-516.
[29] Thompson, A. A., Strickland, A. J. & Gamble, J. E. (2006). Crafting and Executing Strategy. The Quest for Competitive Advantage Concepts and Cases. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
[30] Luthans, F. (1995). Organizational Behavior. 7th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill.
[31] Carsten, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (1987). Unemployment, job satisfaction, and employee turnover: A meta-analysis test of the Muchinsky model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, pp. 374-381.
[32] Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. F. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research, Academy of Management Review, 11 (1), pp. 55-70.
[33] Martin, R. and Martin, A. C. (2003). Employment Relations in Central and Eastern Europe in 2002: Towards EU Accession, Industrial Relations Journal, 34, pp. 498-509.
[34] Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E. & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The Dispositional Approach to Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp. 56-77.
[35] Hulin, C. L., Roznowski, M. &Hachiya, D. (1985). Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions: Empirical and theoretical discrepancies and integration, Psychological Bulletin, 97, pp. 233-250.
[36] Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, pp. 673-686.
[37] Schervish, P. G. (1983). The structural Determinants of unemployment, Vulnerability and power in market relations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
[38] Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee Turnover, Causes, Consequences and Control. MA: Addison-Wesley.
[39] Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job and satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, pp. 237-240.
[40] Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism, Psychological Bulletin, 80, pp. 151-176.
[41] Guion, R. M. & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of Personality Measures in Personnel Selection. Personnel Psychology, 8, pp. 135-164.
[42] Maertz, C. P. & Griffeth, R. W. (2004). Eight motivational forces & voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30 (5), pp. 667-683.
[43] 1Maertz, C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., Allen, D. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 1059-1075.
[44] Steers, Richard M. and Richard T. Mowday. “Employee Turnover and Post Decision Accommodation Processes” in Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, vol. 3, 235-281. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1981.
[45] Shahzad, K., Bashir, S. & Ramay, M. I. (2008). Impact of HR practices on the perceived performance of University teachers in Pakistan. International Business Review, 4 (2), pp. 110-123.
[46] Sherman, B., & Snell, A. (1998). Managing Human Resources, incentives and rewards. Ohio: International Publishing.
[47] Dailey, R. C., & Kirk, D. J. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover, Human Relations, 45 (3), pp. 305-331.
[48] Ferguson, G. H., & Ferguson, W. F. (1986). Distinguishing Voluntary from Involuntary Nurse Turnover. Nursing management, 17 (12), pp. 43-44.
[49] Mowday, R. T., Koberg, C. S. & McArthur, A. W. (1982). The psychology of the withdrawal process: A crossvalidation test of Mobley’s intermediate linkages model of turnover in two samples. Academy of Management Journal, 27, pp. 79-94.
[50] Tser-Yieth, C., Pao-Long, C., & Ching-Wen, Y. (2004). A study of career needs, career development programs, job satisfaction and the turnover intentions of research and development personnel, Career Development International, 9 (4), pp. 424-437.
[51] Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and Human Resource Management. New York, Palgrave.
[52] 7 Vital Employee Retention Strategies: https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2013/12/11/quits-are-up-7-employee-retention-strategies-your-company-must-have/#7d3fb6f97ed4.
Author Information
  • Department of Computer Science, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Magburaka, Sierra Leone

  • Head of Career Department, Sierra Leone Peacekeeping and Law Enforcement Academy (SILEA), Hastings Police Training School, Hastings, Sierra Leone

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ibrahim Abdulai Sawaneh, Fatmata Kanko Kamara. (2019). An Effective Employee Retention Policies as a Way to Boost Organizational Performance. Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(2), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ibrahim Abdulai Sawaneh; Fatmata Kanko Kamara. An Effective Employee Retention Policies as a Way to Boost Organizational Performance. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7(2), 41-48. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ibrahim Abdulai Sawaneh, Fatmata Kanko Kamara. An Effective Employee Retention Policies as a Way to Boost Organizational Performance. J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;7(2):41-48. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12,
      author = {Ibrahim Abdulai Sawaneh and Fatmata Kanko Kamara},
      title = {An Effective Employee Retention Policies as a Way to Boost Organizational Performance},
      journal = {Journal of Human Resource Management},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {41-48},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.20190702.12},
      abstract = {Several organizations in developing nations overlooked the most important elements determining employee retention as a strategy in achieving organizational outputs, making them to become victims of industry competition locally and internationally. The study was conducted to examine the factors that undermine employee retention in tertiary educational institutions in Sierra Leone. Good employee retention policies are crucial to the development of organizational success, as many organization view retaining talented and skillful employee as the basic foundation for reducing cost, and achieving organizational blueprint. Keeping the most talented employees will be the most engaged employees that know the cornerstone of the organization’s policies and operations. They are the main pillars of organization and to some extent, are willing to sacrifice themselves for the success of the organization. They worked tirelessly to attain organizational objectives. Therefore, much attention must be giving to them, more especially considering the factors that will motivate them to do their jobs excellently. They should be treated fairly and must be evaluated on the metrics that define employee retention strategies for organizational success. This is because the organization needs good employees for its day-to-day operations, and good employees make organization successful. Most organizations ensure that they retain the best employees by all means. Losing talented employee is catastrophic in terms of cost and others, making the cost to replace such employee quadrupling their salaries about 300%. Noting that the organization must have spent substantial amount of money on them, such as training, mentorship, scholarship, and other motivational schemes.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - An Effective Employee Retention Policies as a Way to Boost Organizational Performance
    AU  - Ibrahim Abdulai Sawaneh
    AU  - Fatmata Kanko Kamara
    Y1  - 2019/07/13
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12
    T2  - Journal of Human Resource Management
    JF  - Journal of Human Resource Management
    JO  - Journal of Human Resource Management
    SP  - 41
    EP  - 48
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0715
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20190702.12
    AB  - Several organizations in developing nations overlooked the most important elements determining employee retention as a strategy in achieving organizational outputs, making them to become victims of industry competition locally and internationally. The study was conducted to examine the factors that undermine employee retention in tertiary educational institutions in Sierra Leone. Good employee retention policies are crucial to the development of organizational success, as many organization view retaining talented and skillful employee as the basic foundation for reducing cost, and achieving organizational blueprint. Keeping the most talented employees will be the most engaged employees that know the cornerstone of the organization’s policies and operations. They are the main pillars of organization and to some extent, are willing to sacrifice themselves for the success of the organization. They worked tirelessly to attain organizational objectives. Therefore, much attention must be giving to them, more especially considering the factors that will motivate them to do their jobs excellently. They should be treated fairly and must be evaluated on the metrics that define employee retention strategies for organizational success. This is because the organization needs good employees for its day-to-day operations, and good employees make organization successful. Most organizations ensure that they retain the best employees by all means. Losing talented employee is catastrophic in terms of cost and others, making the cost to replace such employee quadrupling their salaries about 300%. Noting that the organization must have spent substantial amount of money on them, such as training, mentorship, scholarship, and other motivational schemes.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections