Using IT for Non-Hierarchical Performance Assessment: New Ways to Develop Professionals in Health Care
Journal of Human Resource Management
Volume 3, Issue 2-1, April 2015, Pages: 11-19
Received: Dec. 30, 2014;
Accepted: Jan. 25, 2015;
Published: Feb. 28, 2015
Views 4846 Downloads 263
Manzo Fabio, IRCCS S.D.N., Naples, Italy
Agrifoglio Rocco, Department of Management, Accounting and Economics, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Naples, Italy
Salvatore Domenico, IRCCS S.D.N., Naples, Italy; Department of Management, Accounting and Economics, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Naples, Italy
The aim of this article is to describe how technological innovations are being used to address the specific challenges of assessing health care professionals’ performance and to discuss the theoretical implications of these innovations for human resources management. Performance management is specifically challenging for organizations employing skilled professionals, such as physicians, due to the complexity in defining performance and to the autonomy that professionals enjoy. Professionalism of employees implies that supervisors cannot evaluate adequately their subordinates’ performance and, thus, alternative assessment systems are necessary. This explains why in health care schemes such as 360-degree feedback and peer review are increasingly used. We define these alternative assessment systems as “non-hierarchical performance assessment” and report exploratory data from an Internet search of performance assessment Information Technology (IT) solutions offered by IT providers. We use a classification of these IT solutions in order to identify and discuss new ways for assessing and for developing professionals in health care. We conclude by discussing differences and similarities between 360-degree feedback and peer review and by identifying current trends and possible future developments about how IT enables new assessment systems in this industry.
Using IT for Non-Hierarchical Performance Assessment: New Ways to Develop Professionals in Health Care, Journal of Human Resource Management. Special Issue: Challenges and Opportunities in the Performance Measurement and Control Systems of Human Resources Management for the Services Industry.
Vol. 3, No. 2-1,
2015, pp. 11-19.
K.G. Rodgers and C. Manifold, “360‐degree Feedback: Possibilities for Assessment of the ACGME Core Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents”. Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 11, pp. 1300-1304, 2002.
A. Miller and J. Archer, “Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: a systematic review,” BMJ 2010; 341: c5064 doi:10.1136/bmj.c5064, 2010.
T. Donnon, A. Al Ansari, S. Al Alawi and C. Violato, “The Reliability, Validity, and Feasibility of Multisource Feedback Physician Assessment: A Systematic Review”, Academic Medicine, Vol. 89, No. 3, March 2014.
K. Overeem, “Doctor performance assessment. Development and impact of a new system”, GVO drukkers en vormgevers B.V. | Ponsen & Looijen, Ede, 2011.
M. Tumerman and L.M., “Increasing Medical Team Cohesion and Leadership Behaviors Using a 360-Degree Evaluation Process”, Wisconsin Medical Journal, vol.111 num.1 pagg. 33-37, 2012.
J.B. Mahgerefteh, J. Krsukal, C.S. Yam, A. Blachar and J. Sosna, “Peer Review in Diagnostic Radiology: Current State and a Vision for the Future”, RadioGraphics vol. 29 n.5, September-October 2009.
D. Nicolini, J. Hartley, A.Stansfield and J. Hurcombe, “Evaluating the competence of physicians in practice: from peer review to performance assessment”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 211–228. doi:10.1108/09534811111119771, 2011
J.K.T. Lee, “Quality—A Radiology Imperative: Interpretation Accuracy and Pertinence”, Journal of the American College of Radiology. Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 162–165, March 2007.
K. Overeem, H. Wollersheim E. Driessen K. Lombarts, G. van de Ven, R. Grol and O. Arah O, “Doctors’ perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study”, Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009. Medical Education 2009; 43: 874–882, 2009.
H.L. Wilensky, “The Professionalization of Everyone?”, American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2775206, 1964.
A. Etzioni, “The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers”, New York: Free Press, 1969.
K. Morell, “Re-defining professions: knowledge, organization and power as syntax”. Critical Management Studies Conference, 11–13, 2007.
E. Freidson, “Professionalism: The third logic”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
W.J. Goode, “Community Within a Community: The Professions. American Sociological Review”, 22(2), 194–200 doi:10.2307/2088857, 1957.
D.B. Nash, L.E. Markson, S. Howell and E.A. Hildreth, “Evaluating the Competence of Physicians in Practice: From Peer Review to Performance Assessment”, Academic Medicine, vol. 68 n.2, February Supplement, February 1993.
A.N. Corallo, R. Croxford, D.C. Goodman, E.L. Bryan, D. Srivastava and T.A. Stukel, “A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries”, Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 114(1), 5–14. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002, 2014.
M.R. Haug, “A re-examination of the hypothesis of deprofessionalisation”. The Milbank Quarterly, 66(suppl 2), 48–56, 1988.
D. Numerato, D. Salvatore and G.Fattore, “The impact of management on medical professionalism: a review”, Sociology of Health and Illness, 34(4), 626–644. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01393.x, 2012.
H. Aguinis, “An expanded view of performance management”, Performance management: putting research into action (pp. 1–44). J.W. Smither and M.London editors, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
M.E. Rosenberg, K. Watson, J. Paul, W. Miller, I. Harris, T.D. Valdivia, “Development and Implementation of a Web-based Evaluation System for an Internal Medicine Residency Program”, Academic Medicine , vol. 76, n. 1, pp. 92-95, 2001.
J.C. Archer, J, Norcini and H. Davies, “Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training", British Medical Journal, 330, pp. 1251–1253, 2005.
J.A. Penny, “Exploring differential item functioning in a 360-degree assessment: rater source and method of delivery”, Organisational Research Methods, 6(1), pp. 61–79, 2003.
.L. Massagli and J.D. Carline, “Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence", Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:845–852, 2007
D.M. Rousseau and Y. Fried, “Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 1–13, 2001.
P. Bamberger, “From the Editors Beyond Contextualization: Using Context Theories to Narrow the Micro-Macro Gap”, Management Research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 839–846. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789630, 2008