An Analysis of Dual Class Equity System - Taking Vanke as an Example
Volume 6, Issue 4, August 2017, Pages: 44-47
Received: Mar. 22, 2017;
Accepted: Jun. 30, 2017;
Published: Aug. 11, 2017
Views 1662 Downloads 114
Gu Yu, Department of Accounting, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China
Wang Boyu, Department of Accounting, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China
Follow on us
The acquisition of Vanke Company by Baoneng group has aroused discussions between the theoretical circle and the real world on the dual class equity system. The development of multi-level ownership structure is a challenge and an opportunity for China's capital market. To research the dual class equity system in the angle of top-level design, we ought to make a change in giving the high-tech, high hit, and blue chip companies the choice of ownership structure in order to adapt the fierce competition environment. the dual class equity system reform level include the strict standards, regulate the entry criteria; strict rules of information disclosure mechanism, guarantee transparency of information and fair environment; defining the subject of management, improve the protection of small investors interest mechanism. We should make a useful exploration of the dual ownership system and continuously promote the reform of the shareholding structure in China.
Ownership Structure, Dual Class Equity System, Vanke
To cite this article
An Analysis of Dual Class Equity System - Taking Vanke as an Example, Economics.
Vol. 6, No. 4,
2017, pp. 44-47.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Li Haiying, Li Shuanghai, Bi Xiaofang. The dual ownership structure under the protection of the interests of small investors, Chinese industrial economy, the case study of Facebook acquisition of WhatsApp [J]. 2017 (01): 174-192.
Hu Panpan. The dual ownership structure system and its legislative introduction [J]. commercial economic research, 2016, (22): 116-117.
Chen Bin. Comment on the reform of dual ownership structure system. Singapore's corporate law perspective, [J]. securities market Herald, 2016, (07): 1.
Peng Peng. Institutional value interpretation and localization approach of dual ownership structure. Taking the partner system of Alibaba group as the breakthrough point [J]. Hebei University of science, 2016, (05): 166-174.
Liu Zongjin. Analysis of the dual ownership structure of overseas listing of Internet based technology companies. Taking Jingdong as an example, [J]. accounting and communication, 2015, (34): 14-16.
Liu Xing, Fu Qiang, Hao Ying. Ultimate controller, agent, two power separation model and private rights of control. [J]. systems engineering theory and practice, 2015, (01): 75-85.
Liu Xing, Fu Qiang, Jiang water. The ultimate property rights under the control of the personal behavior and Governance: a review on the heterogeneous control mechanism of [J]. East China economic management, based on the 2014 (04): 1-7.
Lu Xin, Gong Qiming, Zheng Yangfei. Study on the factors of equity incentive contract and its influencing factors [J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2013, (04): 49-59.
Zhang Lina. Look at the advantages and disadvantages of the dual ownership structure from the Snap listing. [J]. financial industry, 2017, (06): 121-123.
Tang Jingjing [J]. Case of modern business, based on the 2017 Internet companies listed overseas dual ownership structure analysis, (09): 86-87.
Yifei. Vanke equity dispute: trade, opportunity [J]. northern dual ownership structure in 2017 (01): 115-116.