Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science

Yafei Di

doi:doi:10.11648/j.si.20170505.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science

Yafei Di

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 5)

Received: 19 July 2017 Accepted: Published: 19 July 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Since recommender systems are widely used in many fields, it is important to analyze the present situation of recommender system and its development trends. This paper measured and visualized the related papers between 1996 and 2015 based on Web of Science™ Core Collection. Based on annual publications and times cited, journal distribution and research fields, high-frequency authors and cited references, countries or regions and institutions, high-frequency keywords and bursts keywords, this paper summarized the current situation of recommender system and forecasted the development trends of recommender system. This paper determined that the research hotspot of recommender systems was method for recommender system and the application in the field of electronic commerce, science basic research, electronic learning and knowledge management. The future research hotspot will still be the application of the recommender system.

Published in	Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.si.20170505.11
Page(s)	250-255
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Web of Science, Recommender System, Bibliometrics, CiteSpace

References

[1]	Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, et al. Recommender Systems Handbook [M]. Springer US, 2011.
[2]	Ante Odić, Marko Tkalčič, Jurij F. Tasič, et al. Predicting and detecting the relevant contextual information in a movie-recommender system [J]. Interacting with Computers, 2013, 25(1):74-90.
[3]	Li Q, Myaeng S H, Kim B M. A probabilistic music recommender considering user opinions and audio features [J]. Information Processing & Management, 2007, 43(2):473-487.
[4]	Felfernig A, Isak K, Szabo K, et al. The VITA Financial Services Sales Support Environment. [C]// National Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 2007:1692-1699.
[5]	张亮，柏林森，周涛．基于跨电商行为的交叉推荐算法[J]．电子科技大学学报，2013(1):154-160。
[6]	Chiang J H, Chen Y C. An intelligent news recommender agent for filtering and categorizing large volumes of text corpus [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2004, 19(3):201–216.
[7]	Shiratori M. The Book of My Recommendation in Overseas "Mechanical Engineering" [J]. Jama Neurology, 2014, 71(24):1379-1385.
[8]	段文奇，惠淑敏．基于协同过滤的论文推荐一传播平台模型研究[J]．科学学研究，2012,30(10):24-29。
[9]	Smyth B, Coyle M, Briggs P. Communities, Collaboration, and Recommender Systems in Personalized Web Search [J]. Recommender Systems Handbook, 2010:579-614.
[10]	Felfernig A, Isak K, Szabo K, et al. The VITA Financial Services Sales Support Environment. [C]// National Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 2007:1692-1699.
[11]	Jacso P. As we may search–Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases [J]. Currentence, 2005, 89(89):1537-1547.
[12]	Falagas M E, Pitsouni E I, Malietzis G A, et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weakness. FASEB J [J]. Faseb Journal, 2008, 22(2):338-342.
[13]	Archambault,, Campbell D, Gingras Y, et al. Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(7):1320–1326.
[14]	王会梅．数字图书馆中Web of science数据库的解读与应用[J]．农业图书情报学刊，2010,22(11):100-103。
[15]	杨华，蔡言厚．论提高被引频次的意义、客观条件和主观努力[J]．评价与管理，2010,02:24-27。
[16]	Börner K, Chen C, Boyack K W. Visualizing knowledge domains [J]. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 2003, 37(1):179–255.
[17]	Chen C. Mining the Web: Discovering knowledge from hypertext data[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2004, 55(3):275–276.
[18]	Synnestvedt M B, Chen C, Holmes J H. CiteSpace II: visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases. [J]. AMIA. Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium, 2005, 2005:724-728.
[19]	Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3):359-377.
[20]	Chen C, Dubin R, Kim M C. Orphan drugs and rare diseases: a scientometric review (2000 – 2014) [J]. Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs, 2014, 2(7):709-724.
[21]	Chen C, Hu Z, Liu S, et al. Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. [J]. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2012, 12(5):593-608.
[22]	张静．引文、引文分析与学术论文评价[J]．社会科学管理与评论，2008,01:33-38。
[23]	Herlocker J L. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems [J]. Acm Transactions on Information Systems, 2004, 22(1):5-53.
[24]	Burke R. Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments [J]. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 2002, 12(4):331-370.
[25]	Leskovec J, Adamic L A, Huberman B A. The Dynamics of Viral Marketing [J]. Acm Transactions on the Web, 2005, 1(1):5.
[26]	Hofmann T. Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering [J]. Acm Transactions on Information Systems, 2004, 22(1):89-115.
[27]	Goldberg K, Roeder T, Gupta D, et al. Eigentaste: A Constant Time Collaborative Filtering Algorithm [J]. Information Retrieval Journal, 2001, 4(2):133-151.
[28]	Resnick P, Varian H R. Recommender systems[J]. Communications of the Acm, 1997, 40(3):56–58.
[29]	Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C. Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems [J]. Computer, 2009, 42(8):30-37.
[30]	Leskovec J, Adamic L A, Huberman B A. The dynamics of viral marketing [C]// 2006:228-237.
[31]	Brozek J L, Bousquet J, Baena-Cagnani C E, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 revision. [J]. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, 2010, 126(3):466-476.
[32]	Srivastava J. Automatic personalization based on web usage mining - Web usage mining can help improve the scalability, accuracy, and flexibility of recommender systems [J]. 2000.
[33]	Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature [M]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2006.
[34]	刘征宇．精准营销方法研究[J]．上海交通大学学报，2007(S1):143-146。
[35]	Meng Q, Han X. Research of precise marketing strategy based on data mining [J]. Metallurgical & Mining Industry, 2015.
[36]	Mokhtarian P L. A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce [J]. Transportation, 2004, 31(3):257-284.
[37]	Cao M, Zhang Q, Seydel J. B2C e‐commerce web site quality: an empirical examination [J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2006, 105(5):645-661.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yafei Di. (2017). Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science. Science Innovation, 5(5), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yafei Di. Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(5), 250-255. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yafei Di. Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science. Sci Innov. 2017;5(5):250-255. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20170505.11,
  author = {Yafei Di},
  title = {Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {5},
  number = {5},
  pages = {250-255},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170505.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170505.11},
  abstract = {Since recommender systems are widely used in many fields, it is important to analyze the present situation of recommender system and its development trends. This paper measured and visualized the related papers between 1996 and 2015 based on Web of Science™ Core Collection. Based on annual publications and times cited, journal distribution and research fields, high-frequency authors and cited references, countries or regions and institutions, high-frequency keywords and bursts keywords, this paper summarized the current situation of recommender system and forecasted the development trends of recommender system. This paper determined that the research hotspot of recommender systems was method for recommender system and the application in the field of electronic commerce, science basic research, electronic learning and knowledge management. The future research hotspot will still be the application of the recommender system.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science
AU  - Yafei Di
Y1  - 2017/07/19
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20170505.11
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 250
EP  - 255
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11
AB  - Since recommender systems are widely used in many fields, it is important to analyze the present situation of recommender system and its development trends. This paper measured and visualized the related papers between 1996 and 2015 based on Web of Science™ Core Collection. Based on annual publications and times cited, journal distribution and research fields, high-frequency authors and cited references, countries or regions and institutions, high-frequency keywords and bursts keywords, this paper summarized the current situation of recommender system and forecasted the development trends of recommender system. This paper determined that the research hotspot of recommender systems was method for recommender system and the application in the field of electronic commerce, science basic research, electronic learning and knowledge management. The future research hotspot will still be the application of the recommender system.
VL  - 5
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Yafei Di

Literature Information Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yafei Di. (2017). Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science. Science Innovation, 5(5), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yafei Di. Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(5), 250-255. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yafei Di. Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science. Sci Innov. 2017;5(5):250-255. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20170505.11,
  author = {Yafei Di},
  title = {Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {5},
  number = {5},
  pages = {250-255},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170505.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170505.11},
  abstract = {Since recommender systems are widely used in many fields, it is important to analyze the present situation of recommender system and its development trends. This paper measured and visualized the related papers between 1996 and 2015 based on Web of Science™ Core Collection. Based on annual publications and times cited, journal distribution and research fields, high-frequency authors and cited references, countries or regions and institutions, high-frequency keywords and bursts keywords, this paper summarized the current situation of recommender system and forecasted the development trends of recommender system. This paper determined that the research hotspot of recommender systems was method for recommender system and the application in the field of electronic commerce, science basic research, electronic learning and knowledge management. The future research hotspot will still be the application of the recommender system.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Bibliometric Research on Recommender System Research Based on Web of Science
AU  - Yafei Di
Y1  - 2017/07/19
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20170505.11
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 250
EP  - 255
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.11
AB  - Since recommender systems are widely used in many fields, it is important to analyze the present situation of recommender system and its development trends. This paper measured and visualized the related papers between 1996 and 2015 based on Web of Science™ Core Collection. Based on annual publications and times cited, journal distribution and research fields, high-frequency authors and cited references, countries or regions and institutions, high-frequency keywords and bursts keywords, this paper summarized the current situation of recommender system and forecasted the development trends of recommender system. This paper determined that the research hotspot of recommender systems was method for recommender system and the application in the field of electronic commerce, science basic research, electronic learning and knowledge management. The future research hotspot will still be the application of the recommender system.
VL  - 5
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download