Science Innovation

| Peer-Reviewed |

"Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept

Received: 29 March 2019    Accepted:     Published: 23 May 2019
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Faced with the international engineering education and the training of innovative talents, CDIO's education mode is an engineering training idea aiming at the cultivation of ability.Based on the problem of multivariate evaluation of the cultivation effect of innovation ability, this paper puts forward the KPI evaluation method of innovation ability under the concept of CDIO+ from the reform of the current teaching evaluation method in colleges and universities in China. This method establishes the KPI competence evaluation matrix based on the content evaluation of knowledge points, adopts the "Trinity" diversified curriculum evaluation system, and uses the content of proposition quality assessment to strengthen the contribution and achievement of curriculum indicators.Through the course practice of "universal design method and innovative design method", the results show: under the curriculum coordinate system of "Double creation", this method pays attention to the cultivation of students' innovative consciousness and engineering practice ability, forms the benign internal incentive mechanism of students' curriculum theory and engineering practice of innovation learning, effectively inspires students' enthusiasm and initiative, and promotes the improvement of students' innovation ability.

DOI 10.11648/j.si.20190701.18
Published in Science Innovation (Volume 7, Issue 1, February 2019)
Page(s) 37-42
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CDIO+, Innovation Ability, KPI, Courses Evaluation, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

References
[1] 胡改玲,陈雪峰,陈花玲,段玉岗,王永泉,金悦。面向“中国制造2025”工程实践人才培养模式的改革思考[J].高校实验室工作研究,2018(02):108-110。
[2] 胡文龙.基于CDIO的工科探究式教学改革研究[J].高等工程教育研究,2014(1): 163-168。
[3] 李雪姣,田友谊.交往教学视域下的创造性人才培养[J].教学研究,2016,39(1): 104-109。
[4] 熊凤,谭建川,何小丽。基于CDIO理念的“电工技术”行动导向教学探索与实践[J].科学咨询(科技•管理),2015(03):127-128.
[5] 吴红雪。浅谈CDIO模式在初级电子设计教学中的运用[J].赤子(上中旬),2016(15):77-79。
[6] 李军锋,彭冲。基于KPI的高校院系整体绩效考核应用研究[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版).2011. 7:112-113.
[7] 靳泽宇。当前我国高等教育评价存在的问题及对策[J].中北大学学报(社 会 科 学 版)2017,2(33):114-115。
[8] 崔艳清,王艳萍. OBE 理念下课程评价体系研究——以《移动产品界面交互设计》课程为例[J].教育现代化,2018, 5(53): 130-131。
[9] 叶波霞.基于KPI的实训课程效果评价体系构建与实践[J].时代金融,2016,11:305-308。
[10] 刘先祥. 新课程实施中校本教师评价研究[D].山东师范大学,2008
[11] 李宝婵. 基于CDIO 理念的资产评估实训课程教学效果评价指标体系的构建[J].会计教育2016,5:115-118。
[12] 罗三桂,刘莉莉.我国高校课程考核改革趋势分析[J].中国大学教学,2014(12):71-74.
[13] 蒋阿宁,管建慧.以培养创新能力为导向的课程教学评价体系的探索与实践——以《微生物分析检测技术》课程为例[J].现代经济信息2018,5:466-468。
[14] Fan Y H,Zhang X W,Xie X L. Design and development of a coursein professionalism and ethics for CDIO curriculum in China [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2015, 21 (5): 1381-1389.
[15] 李建军,张永强.基于CDIO 教育理念的化工实践教学体系的构建与探索[J].教学研究,2016,39(6): 97-100。
[16] 姜钢.深化考试内容与形式改革 助力人才选拔和素质教育[J].中国高等教育,2014(23):7-9。
[17] 于克强,杨松华,宋胜伟. 基于创新能力培养的机械设计基础教学设计改革与实践[J].教学研究,2017,40(3): 82-86.
[18] 解芳,朱磊,林红旗,张林海,侯宇,庞兴华.专业认证驱动下《机械原理》课程目标达成度评价策略及应用[J].价值工程,2018,37(18):293-295。
[19] 吕慧丹,刘勇平,刘峥.《有机化学》课程考核改革方法的研究[J].科技视界,2015(01):88-89.
Author Information
  • School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin,China

  • School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin,China

  • School of High Temperature Materials and Magnesium Resources Engineering, Liaoning University of Science and Technology, Anshan, China

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ge Yang, Shi Dongyan, Li Zhihui. (2019). "Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept. Science Innovation, 7(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20190701.18

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ge Yang; Shi Dongyan; Li Zhihui. "Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept. Sci. Innov. 2019, 7(1), 37-42. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20190701.18

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ge Yang, Shi Dongyan, Li Zhihui. "Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept. Sci Innov. 2019;7(1):37-42. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20190701.18

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.si.20190701.18,
      author = {Ge Yang and Shi Dongyan and Li Zhihui},
      title = {"Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept},
      journal = {Science Innovation},
      volume = {7},
      number = {1},
      pages = {37-42},
      doi = {10.11648/j.si.20190701.18},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20190701.18},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20190701.18},
      abstract = {Faced with the international engineering education and the training of innovative talents, CDIO's education mode is an engineering training idea aiming at the cultivation of ability.Based on the problem of multivariate evaluation of the cultivation effect of innovation ability, this paper puts forward the KPI evaluation method of innovation ability under the concept of CDIO+ from the reform of the current teaching evaluation method in colleges and universities in China. This method establishes the KPI competence evaluation matrix based on the content evaluation of knowledge points, adopts the "Trinity" diversified curriculum evaluation system, and uses the content of proposition quality assessment to strengthen the contribution and achievement of curriculum indicators.Through the course practice of "universal design method and innovative design method", the results show: under the curriculum coordinate system of "Double creation", this method pays attention to the cultivation of students' innovative consciousness and engineering practice ability, forms the benign internal incentive mechanism of students' curriculum theory and engineering practice of innovation learning, effectively inspires students' enthusiasm and initiative, and promotes the improvement of students' innovation ability.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - "Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept
    AU  - Ge Yang
    AU  - Shi Dongyan
    AU  - Li Zhihui
    Y1  - 2019/05/23
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20190701.18
    DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20190701.18
    T2  - Science Innovation
    JF  - Science Innovation
    JO  - Science Innovation
    SP  - 37
    EP  - 42
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-787X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20190701.18
    AB  - Faced with the international engineering education and the training of innovative talents, CDIO's education mode is an engineering training idea aiming at the cultivation of ability.Based on the problem of multivariate evaluation of the cultivation effect of innovation ability, this paper puts forward the KPI evaluation method of innovation ability under the concept of CDIO+ from the reform of the current teaching evaluation method in colleges and universities in China. This method establishes the KPI competence evaluation matrix based on the content evaluation of knowledge points, adopts the "Trinity" diversified curriculum evaluation system, and uses the content of proposition quality assessment to strengthen the contribution and achievement of curriculum indicators.Through the course practice of "universal design method and innovative design method", the results show: under the curriculum coordinate system of "Double creation", this method pays attention to the cultivation of students' innovative consciousness and engineering practice ability, forms the benign internal incentive mechanism of students' curriculum theory and engineering practice of innovation learning, effectively inspires students' enthusiasm and initiative, and promotes the improvement of students' innovation ability.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections