"Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept
Volume 7, Issue 1, February 2019, Pages: 37-42
Received: May 22, 2019;
Published: May 23, 2019
Views 26 Downloads 3
Ge Yang, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin,China
Shi Dongyan, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin,China
Li Zhihui, School of High Temperature Materials and Magnesium Resources Engineering, Liaoning University of Science and Technology, Anshan, China
Follow on us
Faced with the international engineering education and the training of innovative talents, CDIO's education mode is an engineering training idea aiming at the cultivation of ability.Based on the problem of multivariate evaluation of the cultivation effect of innovation ability, this paper puts forward the KPI evaluation method of innovation ability under the concept of CDIO+ from the reform of the current teaching evaluation method in colleges and universities in China. This method establishes the KPI competence evaluation matrix based on the content evaluation of knowledge points, adopts the "Trinity" diversified curriculum evaluation system, and uses the content of proposition quality assessment to strengthen the contribution and achievement of curriculum indicators.Through the course practice of "universal design method and innovative design method", the results show: under the curriculum coordinate system of "Double creation", this method pays attention to the cultivation of students' innovative consciousness and engineering practice ability, forms the benign internal incentive mechanism of students' curriculum theory and engineering practice of innovation learning, effectively inspires students' enthusiasm and initiative, and promotes the improvement of students' innovation ability.
CDIO+, Innovation Ability, KPI, Courses Evaluation, Innovation and Entrepreneurship
To cite this article
"Trinity" KPI Evaluation Method for Innovation Ability Under CDIO+ Concept, Science Innovation.
Vol. 7, No. 1,
2019, pp. 37-42.