Study on Office Building Window Design Strategy in Severe Cold Region Based on Daylight Comfort
Science Discovery
Volume 5, Issue 7, December 2017, Pages: 572-578
Received: Dec. 28, 2017; Published: Dec. 29, 2017
Views 353      Downloads 27
Wang Zhao, School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Yin Qing, School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Effective and reasonable daylight can create a comfortable and healthy lighting environment, and significantly affect the quality of indoor light environment in office buildings. Reasonable architectural form design can improve indoor light environment quality and visual comfort degree, and has great significance. Combining with light climate characteristics in severe cold region, the study based on parametric model, aims to analyze the influence degree of the window-wall ratio, glass transmittance and window shape on lighting comfort of westward office buildings. Taking a westward office building in Harbin as an example, Rhino & Grasshopper is used to establish the parametric simulation model. Using different conditions of Window-Wall Ratio (WWR), Window Height (WH) and Height-Width Ratio (H/W) as variables to calculate the value of Daylight Factors (DF) and Daylight Discomfort Probability (DGP) through the control variable method. Adopting the regression analysis, the correlation between above three exterior window variables and the lighting comfort degree is studied, and the optimal design strategies for lighting environment of western office buildings in severe cold region are summarized. The results show that when the WWR is 0.2-0.3, the daylight comfortable performance is the best, the WH is about 0.9 and W/H is between 0.4-0.8, the office building has better daylight comfortable quality.
Office Building, Lighting Comfort Performance, Window, Design Strategy
To cite this article
Wang Zhao, Yin Qing, Study on Office Building Window Design Strategy in Severe Cold Region Based on Daylight Comfort, Science Discovery. Vol. 5, No. 7, 2017, pp. 572-578. doi: 10.11648/
Boyce P R. Human Factors in Lighting, Second Edition [J]. Crc Press, 2003.
CIE. International lighting vocabulary. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage [J]. CIE, 2011.
Kazanasmaz T, Grobe L O, Bauer C, et al. Three approaches to optimize optical properties and size of a South-facing window for spatial Daylight Autonomy [J]. Building and Environment, 2016, 102:243-256.
Reinhart C F, Walkenhorst O. Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2001, 33(7):683-697.
Reinhart C F, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design [J]. Leukos the Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2013, 3(1-4):7-31.
Heschong L, Wymelenberg V D, (Vice Chair), Keven, et al. Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) [S]. Illuminating Engineering Society, 2016.
Nabil A. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings [J]. Lighting Research and Technology, 2005, 37(1):41-59.
Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2006, 38(7):905-913.
Reinhart C, Lagios K., Niemasz J. 2011. DIVA for Rhino Version 2.0.
Science Publishing Group
NEW YORK, NY 10018
Tel: (001)347-688-8931