Research on Traditional Village Protection Based on Value Evaluation
Science Discovery
Volume 7, Issue 5, October 2019, Pages: 291-298
Received: Oct. 23, 2019; Published: Oct. 23, 2019
Views 23      Downloads 3
Authors
Chen Lipeng, Urban Planning, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Chao Yaoming, Urban Planning, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The traditional village inherits a long history and culture, is an important carrier of harmonious symbiosis between the countryside and the natural environment, and is the essence of rural civilization and the crystallization of culture and art. Traditional villages play a very important role in displaying local culture, protecting outstanding historical buildings and local material resources. In the 21st century, traditional Chinese villages face many difficulties such as the accelerated speed of disappearance, the lack of traditional culture, the weak development of the protection of material and non-material elements. Taking Cangkou Village of Nanjing as an example, the material and cultural elements within the village are evaluated for their value from the two levels of value characteristics and strategic measures. According to the results of the value assessment, all material cultural resources points are classified into four levels,and different targeted protection levels of material and cultural elements is carried out; the inheritance of intangible culture and protection also needs to be strengthened. To achieve the protection of traditional villages, on the basis of government policy guarantees, targeted innovations in protection measures are also needed. In the past, the research on the protection of traditional villages was mainly qualitative. The research in this paper focuses on the combination of quantitative and qualitative, and has certain reference significance for the protection research of traditional villages.
Keywords
Value Evaluation, Traditonal Village, Protection, Cangkou Village
To cite this article
Chen Lipeng, Chao Yaoming, Research on Traditional Village Protection Based on Value Evaluation, Science Discovery. Vol. 7, No. 5, 2019, pp. 291-298. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20190705.16
References
[1]
王金敖.乡村振兴视阈下的台州传统村落可持续发展路径探讨[J].浙江农业科学,2019,60 (5): 840-843,847。
[2]
谢青玉.“美丽乡村”视阈下河南省传统村落保护与发展的生态适应性研究[J].甘肃农业,2019,(04): 47-50。
[3]
邢晶晶. 基于延续性视角的传统村落保护与发展研究[D].长沙: 湖南师范大学,2015。
[4]
乔小河. 时间与空间中的西藏农村民居[D].北京: 中央民族大学,2012。
[5]
董艳平,刘树鹏. 基于 GIS的山西省传统村落空间分布特征研究[J].太原理工大学学报,2018,49 (5): 771-776。
[6]
卢松,张小军,张业臣 . 徽州传统村落的时空分布及其影响因素[J].地理科学,2018,38 (10) : 1690-1698。
[7]
刘大均,胡静,陈君子,等. 中国传统村落的空间分布格局研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24 (4) : 157-162.
[8]
李伯华,周鑫,刘沛林,等. 城镇化进程中张谷英村功能转型与空间重构[J].地理科学,2018,38 (8) : 1310-1318。
[9]
王景新,支晓娟. 中国乡村振兴及其地域空间重构: 特色小镇与美丽乡村同建振兴乡村的案例、经验及未来[J].南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版,2018,18 (2) : 17-26; 157-158。
[10]
范建红,莫悠. 基于田园综合体的广州龙洞村景观保护规划[J].工业建筑,2019,49 (1) : 99; 189-193。
[11]
翟洲燕,李同昇,常芳,等. 传统村落文化对城乡一体化的统筹性响应机理[J].人文地理,2017,32(4) : 30-36。
[12]
林琳,田嘉铄,钟志平,等. 文化景观基因视角下传统村落保护与发展: 以黔东北土家族村落为例[J].热带地理,2018,38(3) : 413-423。
[13]
秦红增,曹晗. 新文化空间的建构与前瞻: 从耕读传家到乡村新习[J].广西民族大学学报: 哲学社会科学版,2016,38(6) : 8-15。
[14]
翟洲燕,王兴中. 基于社区体系结构的社区资源可获性评价原理研究[J].世界地理研究,2012,21 (2) : 144-50。
[15]
杨立国,刘沛林. 传统村落文化传承度评价体系及实证研究: 以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J].经济地理,2017,37 (12) :203-210。
[16]
麻勇恒. 传统村落保护面临的困境与出路[J].原生态民族文化学刊,2017,9 (2) : 89-94。
[17]
孔翔,卓方勇,苗长松. 旅游业发展状况对古村落文化保护的影响: 基于对宏村、呈坎、许村居民的调研[J].热带地理,2016,36 (2): 216-224。
[18]
黄震方,黄睿. 城镇化与旅游发展背景下的乡村文化研究: 学术争鸣与研究方向[J].地理研究,2018,37 (2): 233-249。
[19]
李伯华,曾荣倩,刘沛林,等.基于CAS 理论的传统村落人居环境演化研究: 以张谷英村为例[J].地理研究,2018,37 (10): 1982-1996。
[20]
李艳华. 村落文化生态环境的解析及对新农村生态环境设计的启示: 以榆次地区后沟村为例 [J].中国美术,2014(4) : 122-124。
[21]
李慧敏,王树声. 古村落人居环境构建原型及文化景观环境营造: 以国家历史文化名村夏门为例[J].西北大学学报: 自然科学版,2012,42 (5): 849-852。
[22]
刘倩颖.自然条件对村落形态和布局的影响[J].农业科技与信息 (现代园林),2010 (4): 30-32。
[23]
李伯华,刘沛林,窦银娣,等. 中国传统村落人居环境转型发展及其研究进展[J].地理研究,2017,36 (10): 1886-1900。
[24]
吴晓,王承慧,王艳红.大运河遗产保护规划(市一级)的总体思路探析[J].城市规划,2010,34 (09): 49-56。
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186