Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA

Feng Zhe; Fan Qingxin

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA

Feng Zhe, Fan Qingxin

Published in Science Discovery (Volume 5, Issue 3)

Received: 10 May 2017 Accepted: Published: 11 May 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

With the method of life cycle assessment, the paper takes Bayan County, Heilongjiang Province as the case to analyze the resources’ consumption and pollutant releasing of conventional and organic rice cultivation system in northeast China. On the basis of that, the comparative environmental assessment was accomplished. The results showed that the significant environmental impact factors are global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential and fresh water eco-toxicity potential. The environmental impact index of conventional rice is 5.24 in comparison with 4.15 for organic rice. If conventional rice were widely replaced by organic rice, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity and fresh water eco-toxicity potential would be reduced by 47%, 32%, 85% and 67%. However, global warming and fossil energy consumption potential would increase 65% and 14%. In terms of environmental impact, organic rice is not totally superior to conventional rice. In the system of conventional rice cultivation, the agricultural materials period contributes most to environmental impact, occupying more than 60% in eutrophication, fresh water eco-toxicity, terra firma eco-toxicity, human toxicity, acidification and fossil energy consumption potential. In the system of organic rice cultivation, growing period contributes most to environmental impact, taking the place of the agricultural materials period. Thus, actualizing energy-saving and cleaner production in the fertilizer industry, promoting fair irrigation projects and optimizing fertilizer application are the key points to control the potential environmental impacts.

Published in	Science Discovery (Volume 5, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15
Page(s)	186-191
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment, Conventional Rice, Organic Rice, Environmental Impacts

References

[1]	丁栋．我国发布种植业结构调整5年规划[J]．农业机械，2016，5:002。
[2]	孙强，张三元，张俊国，等．东北水稻生产现状及对策[J]．北方水稻，2010,40(2):72-74。
[3]	Tilman,D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D.,Swackhamer, D., 2001. Forecasting agriculturallydriven global environmental change. Science 292, 281–284.
[4]	Blengini G. A, Busto M. The life cycle of rice: LCA of alternative agri-food chain management systems in Vercelli (Italy)[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2009, 90(3): 1512-1522.
[5]	Brentrup F, Küsters J, Kuhlmann H, et al. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2004, 20(3): 247-264.
[6]	王明新，包永红，吴文良，等．华北平原冬小麦生命周期环境影响评价[J]．农业环境科学学报，2006,25(5):1127-1132。
[7]	梁龙，陈源泉，高旺盛，等．华北平原冬小麦-夏玉米种植系统生命周期环境影响评价[J]．农业环境科学学报，2009,28(8):1773-1776。
[8]	ISO E. N. 14040: 2006[J]. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework. European Committee for Standardization, 2006.
[9]	王利．中国化肥产业体系养分资源流动规律与管理策略研究[D]．华中农业大学，2008。
[10]	朱兆良．农田中氮肥的损失与对策[J]．土壤与环境，2000,9(1):1-6。
[11]	邱卫国，唐浩，王超．水稻田面水氮素动态径流流失特性及控制技术研究[J]．农业环境科学学报，2004,23(4):740-744。
[12]	周静雯，苏保林，黄宁波，等．不同灌溉模式下水稻田径流污染试验研究[J]．环境科学，2016(3):963-969。
[13]	王开峰，彭娜，王凯荣，等．长期施用有机肥对稻田土壤重金属含量及其有效性的影响[J]．水土保持学报，2008，22(1):105-108。
[14]	Sleeswijk A. W, van Oers L F. C. M, Guinée J. B, et al. Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: An LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000[J]. Science of the total environment, 2008, 390(1): 227-240.
[15]	曹黎明，李茂柏，王新其，等．基于生命周期评价的上海市水稻生产的碳足迹[J]．生态学报，2014,34(2):491-499。
[16]	Ju X. T, Xing G. X, Chen X. P, et al. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(9): 3041-3046.
[17]	周晓阳，徐明岗，周世伟，Colinet Gilles．长期施肥下我国南方典型农田土壤的酸化特征[J]．植物营养与肥料学报，2015，(06):1615-1621。
[18]	Tapia-Vargas M, Tiscareño-López M, Stone J. J, et al. Tillage system effects on runoff and sediment yield in hillslope agriculture[J]. Field Crops Research, 2001, 69(2): 173-182.
[19]	Mitchell R. D. J, Harrison R, Russell K. J, et al. The effect of crop residue incorporation date on soil inorganic nitrogen, nitrate leaching and nitrogen mineralization[J]. Biology and fertility of soils, 2000, 32(4): 294-301.
[20]	夏小江．太湖地区稻田氮磷养分径流流失及控制技术研究[D]．南京农业大学，2012。
[21]	郭春霞，沈根祥，黄丽华，等．精确滴灌施肥技术对大棚土壤盐渍化和氮磷流失控制的研究[J]．农业环境科学学报，2009,28(2):287-291。
[22]	梁龙，陈源泉，高旺盛．两种水稻生产方式的生命周期环境影响评价[J]．农业环境科学学报，2009,(09):1992-1996。

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Feng Zhe, Fan Qingxin. (2017). Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA. Science Discovery, 5(3), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Feng Zhe; Fan Qingxin. Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA. Sci. Discov. 2017, 5(3), 186-191. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Feng Zhe, Fan Qingxin. Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA. Sci Discov. 2017;5(3):186-191. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15,
  author = {Feng Zhe and Fan Qingxin},
  title = {Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA},
  journal = {Science Discovery},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {186-191},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20170503.15},
  abstract = {With the method of life cycle assessment, the paper takes Bayan County, Heilongjiang Province as the case to analyze the resources’ consumption and pollutant releasing of conventional and organic rice cultivation system in northeast China. On the basis of that, the comparative environmental assessment was accomplished. The results showed that the significant environmental impact factors are global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential and fresh water eco-toxicity potential. The environmental impact index of conventional rice is 5.24 in comparison with 4.15 for organic rice. If conventional rice were widely replaced by organic rice, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity and fresh water eco-toxicity potential would be reduced by 47%, 32%, 85% and 67%. However, global warming and fossil energy consumption potential would increase 65% and 14%. In terms of environmental impact, organic rice is not totally superior to conventional rice. In the system of conventional rice cultivation, the agricultural materials period contributes most to environmental impact, occupying more than 60% in eutrophication, fresh water eco-toxicity, terra firma eco-toxicity, human toxicity, acidification and fossil energy consumption potential. In the system of organic rice cultivation, growing period contributes most to environmental impact, taking the place of the agricultural materials period. Thus, actualizing energy-saving and cleaner production in the fertilizer industry, promoting fair irrigation projects and optimizing fertilizer application are the key points to control the potential environmental impacts.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA
AU  - Feng Zhe
AU  - Fan Qingxin
Y1  - 2017/05/11
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15
T2  - Science Discovery
JF  - Science Discovery
JO  - Science Discovery
SP  - 186
EP  - 191
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0650
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15
AB  - With the method of life cycle assessment, the paper takes Bayan County, Heilongjiang Province as the case to analyze the resources’ consumption and pollutant releasing of conventional and organic rice cultivation system in northeast China. On the basis of that, the comparative environmental assessment was accomplished. The results showed that the significant environmental impact factors are global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential and fresh water eco-toxicity potential. The environmental impact index of conventional rice is 5.24 in comparison with 4.15 for organic rice. If conventional rice were widely replaced by organic rice, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity and fresh water eco-toxicity potential would be reduced by 47%, 32%, 85% and 67%. However, global warming and fossil energy consumption potential would increase 65% and 14%. In terms of environmental impact, organic rice is not totally superior to conventional rice. In the system of conventional rice cultivation, the agricultural materials period contributes most to environmental impact, occupying more than 60% in eutrophication, fresh water eco-toxicity, terra firma eco-toxicity, human toxicity, acidification and fossil energy consumption potential. In the system of organic rice cultivation, growing period contributes most to environmental impact, taking the place of the agricultural materials period. Thus, actualizing energy-saving and cleaner production in the fertilizer industry, promoting fair irrigation projects and optimizing fertilizer application are the key points to control the potential environmental impacts.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Feng Zhe

School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Fan Qingxin

School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Feng Zhe, Fan Qingxin. (2017). Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA. Science Discovery, 5(3), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Feng Zhe; Fan Qingxin. Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA. Sci. Discov. 2017, 5(3), 186-191. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Feng Zhe, Fan Qingxin. Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA. Sci Discov. 2017;5(3):186-191. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15,
  author = {Feng Zhe and Fan Qingxin},
  title = {Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA},
  journal = {Science Discovery},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {186-191},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20170503.15},
  abstract = {With the method of life cycle assessment, the paper takes Bayan County, Heilongjiang Province as the case to analyze the resources’ consumption and pollutant releasing of conventional and organic rice cultivation system in northeast China. On the basis of that, the comparative environmental assessment was accomplished. The results showed that the significant environmental impact factors are global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential and fresh water eco-toxicity potential. The environmental impact index of conventional rice is 5.24 in comparison with 4.15 for organic rice. If conventional rice were widely replaced by organic rice, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity and fresh water eco-toxicity potential would be reduced by 47%, 32%, 85% and 67%. However, global warming and fossil energy consumption potential would increase 65% and 14%. In terms of environmental impact, organic rice is not totally superior to conventional rice. In the system of conventional rice cultivation, the agricultural materials period contributes most to environmental impact, occupying more than 60% in eutrophication, fresh water eco-toxicity, terra firma eco-toxicity, human toxicity, acidification and fossil energy consumption potential. In the system of organic rice cultivation, growing period contributes most to environmental impact, taking the place of the agricultural materials period. Thus, actualizing energy-saving and cleaner production in the fertilizer industry, promoting fair irrigation projects and optimizing fertilizer application are the key points to control the potential environmental impacts.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Study of Conventional and Organic Rice Cultivation System in Northeast China Based on LCA
AU  - Feng Zhe
AU  - Fan Qingxin
Y1  - 2017/05/11
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15
T2  - Science Discovery
JF  - Science Discovery
JO  - Science Discovery
SP  - 186
EP  - 191
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0650
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170503.15
AB  - With the method of life cycle assessment, the paper takes Bayan County, Heilongjiang Province as the case to analyze the resources’ consumption and pollutant releasing of conventional and organic rice cultivation system in northeast China. On the basis of that, the comparative environmental assessment was accomplished. The results showed that the significant environmental impact factors are global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential and fresh water eco-toxicity potential. The environmental impact index of conventional rice is 5.24 in comparison with 4.15 for organic rice. If conventional rice were widely replaced by organic rice, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity and fresh water eco-toxicity potential would be reduced by 47%, 32%, 85% and 67%. However, global warming and fossil energy consumption potential would increase 65% and 14%. In terms of environmental impact, organic rice is not totally superior to conventional rice. In the system of conventional rice cultivation, the agricultural materials period contributes most to environmental impact, occupying more than 60% in eutrophication, fresh water eco-toxicity, terra firma eco-toxicity, human toxicity, acidification and fossil energy consumption potential. In the system of organic rice cultivation, growing period contributes most to environmental impact, taking the place of the agricultural materials period. Thus, actualizing energy-saving and cleaner production in the fertilizer industry, promoting fair irrigation projects and optimizing fertilizer application are the key points to control the potential environmental impacts.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download