Science Discovery

| Peer-Reviewed |

Research Status of 1-D Nonlinear Soil Layers Seismic Response in Time Domain

Received: 2 September 2019    Accepted:     Published: 8 November 2019
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The soil dynamic constitutive model has always been one of the frontier topics in soil dynamics. In the past few decades, the constitutive model of soil has been rapidly developed, and with computer technology and one-dimensional soil earthquakes. In the development of reaction analysis methods, many earthquake response models and calculation procedures for one-dimensional time domain nonlinear soil layers have emerged. In this paper, the deterministic method of theoretical analysis is used to summarize the development of soil constitutive model in soil-time seismic nonlinear method. The time-domain nonlinear soil used in different periods is introduced according to the development order of constitutive model. Layer seismic response procedures and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the latest improvements made to them. Finally, the development direction of nonlinear method programs is prospected.

DOI 10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19
Published in Science Discovery (Volume 7, Issue 5, October 2019)
Page(s) 312-317
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Constitutive Model, Soil Seismic Response, Non-Linear

References
[1] Richter C F. Elementary Seismology [M]. San-Francisco, 1958
[2] Aki, K. Local site effects on strong ground motion. Proc. Earthq. Eng. Soil Dyn. II, 1988, 103-155.
[3] 齐文浩,薄景山,张忠利.土层地震反应分析的研究现状[J].世界工程,2010,26(S1):368-372.
[4] Masing, G. Eigenspannungeu and verfertigung beim Messing [J]. proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Applied Mechanics, Zurich. 1926.
[5] 李小军,彭青.不同类别场地地震动参数的计算分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2001(01):29-36.
[6] 李小军,廖振鹏.土应力应变关系的粘-弹-塑模型[J].地震工程与工程振动,1989(03):65-72.
[7] 张克绪, 谢君斐.土动力学[ M] .北京:地震出版社, 1989.
[8] 齐文浩. 土层地震反应分析方法的比较研究[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所,2004.
[9] Pyke, R. M. (1979). “Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div. 105 (6), 715-726.
[10] Matasovic, N., and Vucetic, M. 1993. “Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands.” J. Geotech. Engrg , 11911, 1805–1822.
[11] Matasovic, N., and Vucetic, M. (1995). “Generalized cyclic-degradation pore-pressure generation model for clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 121 (1), 33–42.
[12] Youssef M.A. Hashash,Duhee Park. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment[J]. Engineering Geology,2001,62(1).
[13] 王志良,韩清宇.粘弹塑性土层地震反应的波动分析法[J].地震工程与工程振动,1981(01):117-137.
[14] 李小军.土的动力本构关系的一种简单函数表达式[J].岩土工程学报,1992(05):90-94.
[15] 李小军,廖振鹏,张克绪.考虑阻尼拟合的动态骨架曲线函数式[J].地震工程与工程振动,1994(01):30-35.
[16] 栾茂田.土动力非线性分析中的变参数Ramberg-Osgood本构模型[J].地震工程与工程振动,1992(02):69-78.
[17] 栾茂田,林皋.土料非线性滞回本构模型的半解析半离散构造方法[J].大连理工大学学报,1992(06):694-701.
[18] 栾茂田,林皋.场地地震反应非线性分析的有效时域算法[J].大连理工大学学报,1994,34(02):228-234.
[19] 金星,孔戈,丁海平. 水平成层场地地震反应非线性分析[J] 地震工程与工程振动, 2004, 24(3): 38-43.
[20] 陈学良. 土体动力特性、复杂场地非线性地震反应及其方法研究[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所,2006.
[21] 齐文浩,王振清,薄景山.土层非线性地震反应分析方法及其检验[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2010,31(04):444-450.
[22] 齐文浩. 土层非线性地震反应分析方法研究[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所,2008.
[23] Martin PP, Seed HB. One-dimensional dynamic ground response analysis. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division ASCE{1982; 108:935}952
[24] Idriss, I M and Seed, H B. Seismic response of horizontal soil layers [J]. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Proceedings of ASCE, 1968, 94 (4): 1003-1031.
[25] 陈国兴,庄海洋.基于Davidenkov骨架曲线的土体动力本构关系及其参数研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005(08):860-864.
[26] 张克绪,李明宰,王治琨.基于非曼辛准则的土动弹塑性模型[J].地震工程与工程振动,1997(02):74-81.
[27] Yee, E., Stewart, J., and Tokimatsu, K. (2013). ”Elastic and Large-Strain Nonlinear Seismic Site Response from Analysis of Vertical Array Recordings.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 139 (10), 1789–1801.
[28] Iwan W D. On a class of models for yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1967, 34 (3): 612617
[29] 郑大同,王惠昌.循环荷载作用下土的非线性应力应变模型[J].岩土工程学报,1983(01):65-76.
[30] 蔡袁强,柳伟,徐长节,黄洪超.基于修正Iwan模型的软黏土动应力–应变关系研究[J].岩土工程学报,2007(09):1314-1319.
[31] Streeter, V. L., E. B. Wylie, and F. E. Richart, Jr., "CHARSOIL, Characteristics Method Applied to Soils," March 25, 1974.
[32] 1Priolo, E. and L. Siro (1989). Some improvements in computer program CHARSOIL, including an elastic half-space boundary condition, in Soil Dynamics and Liquefaction, A. S. Cakmak and I. Herrera (Editors), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 181-195.
[33] 韩蓬勃. 一维时域非线性场地地震反应分析程序CHARSOIL的改进[D].防灾科技学院,2019.
[34] Lee, M. K. W., and W. D. L. Finn, Dynamic Effective Stress Response Analysis of Soil Deposits with Energy Transmitting Boundary Including Assessment of Liquefaction Potential, Dept, of Civil Eng., Soil Mechanics Series No. 38, The Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, June, 1978, revised 1982.
[35] Yu, G. (1994). Some aspects of earthquake seismology: slip partitioning along major convergent plate boundary; composite source model for estimation of strong motion; and nonlinear soil response modcling, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada.
[36] Finn WDL, Yoshida N, Lee MK (2000) DESRA-2C, dynamic effective stress analysis of soil deposits with liquefaction beneath an impermeable layer with energy transmitting boundary. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
[37] Kavazanjian, Jr., E. and Matasovic, N., 1995, “Seismic Analysis of Solid Waste Landfills”,Geoenvironmental 2000, Acar, Y. B. and Daniel, D. E., Editors, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 46, ASCE, Vol. 2, proceedings of a specialty conference held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 1995, pp. 1066-1080.
[38] Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1995) Seismic Response of Soil Deposits Composed of Fully-Saturated Clay and Sand Layers. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Earthquake Geotech. Engrg., Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 14–16, V. 1, pp 611–616.
[39] Matasovic, N. 2006. D-MOD2—A computer program for seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, earthfill dams, and solid waste landfills, user’s manual, GeoMotions, LLC, Lacey, Wash., 20 p. (plus appendices).
[40] Li, X. S., Wang, Z. L., and Shen, C. K. 1992. SUMDES: A nonlinear procedure for response analysis of horizontally-layered sites subjected to multidirectional earthquake loading. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Calif., Davis, Calif.
[41] Ming H Y, Li X S. SUMDES2D, a two dimensional fully-coupled geotechnical earthquake analysis program [R] .Hong Kong :Hong Kong University of Science and Technology , 2001.
[42] 苏栋,李相菘.离心机自由场地震响应的完全耦合模拟[J].岩土力学,2006,27(S2):1079-1083.
[43] 李靖. 密砂的力学性质及密砂场地地震响应研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2010.
[44] Hashash Y.M.A. DEEPSOIL V6.1 User Manual and Tutorial [M].
[45] Groholski, D. R., Hashash, Y. M. A., Musgrove, M., Harmon, J., and Kim, B. (2015) ” Evaluation of 1-D Non-linear Site Response Analysis using a General Quadratic/Hyperbolic Strength Controlled Constitutive Model” 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand
[46] Hashash, Y., Park, D. and Tsai, C. C., Philips, C. and Groholski, D.R. (2016), “DEEPSOIL - 1-D Wave Propagation Analysis Program for Geotechnical Site Response Analysis of Deep Soil Deposits, Version 6.1”, Tutorial and User Manual, University of Illinois at Urbana Campaign.
[47] 肖遥. 场地地震反应分析方法的研究[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所,2011.
[48] 李兆焱,袁晓铭,王鸾,王克.巨厚场地三种土层地震反应分析程序对比检验[J].地震工程与工程振动,2017,37(04):42-50.
[49] Kumar, S. S., Dey, A. and Krishna, A. M. (2013). “Equivalent linear and nonlinear ground response analysis of two typical sites at Guwahati city”. Proc., Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC-2013), Kakinada, India.
[50] 杨洋,孙锐,杨洪搏,陈卓识.国际上两种典型土层地震反应分析程序对比研究[J].世界地震工程,2017,33(03):17-23.
[51] 张海,王震,周泽辉,尤红兵.基于DEEPSOIL的软土场地地震反应研究[J].震灾防御技术,2015,10(02):291-304.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Liu Bingbing, Qiao Yunlong. (2019). Research Status of 1-D Nonlinear Soil Layers Seismic Response in Time Domain. Science Discovery, 7(5), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Liu Bingbing; Qiao Yunlong. Research Status of 1-D Nonlinear Soil Layers Seismic Response in Time Domain. Sci. Discov. 2019, 7(5), 312-317. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Liu Bingbing, Qiao Yunlong. Research Status of 1-D Nonlinear Soil Layers Seismic Response in Time Domain. Sci Discov. 2019;7(5):312-317. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19,
      author = {Liu Bingbing and Qiao Yunlong},
      title = {Research Status of 1-D Nonlinear Soil Layers Seismic Response in Time Domain},
      journal = {Science Discovery},
      volume = {7},
      number = {5},
      pages = {312-317},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20190705.19},
      abstract = {The soil dynamic constitutive model has always been one of the frontier topics in soil dynamics. In the past few decades, the constitutive model of soil has been rapidly developed, and with computer technology and one-dimensional soil earthquakes. In the development of reaction analysis methods, many earthquake response models and calculation procedures for one-dimensional time domain nonlinear soil layers have emerged. In this paper, the deterministic method of theoretical analysis is used to summarize the development of soil constitutive model in soil-time seismic nonlinear method. The time-domain nonlinear soil used in different periods is introduced according to the development order of constitutive model. Layer seismic response procedures and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the latest improvements made to them. Finally, the development direction of nonlinear method programs is prospected.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Research Status of 1-D Nonlinear Soil Layers Seismic Response in Time Domain
    AU  - Liu Bingbing
    AU  - Qiao Yunlong
    Y1  - 2019/11/08
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19
    T2  - Science Discovery
    JF  - Science Discovery
    JO  - Science Discovery
    SP  - 312
    EP  - 317
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0650
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20190705.19
    AB  - The soil dynamic constitutive model has always been one of the frontier topics in soil dynamics. In the past few decades, the constitutive model of soil has been rapidly developed, and with computer technology and one-dimensional soil earthquakes. In the development of reaction analysis methods, many earthquake response models and calculation procedures for one-dimensional time domain nonlinear soil layers have emerged. In this paper, the deterministic method of theoretical analysis is used to summarize the development of soil constitutive model in soil-time seismic nonlinear method. The time-domain nonlinear soil used in different periods is introduced according to the development order of constitutive model. Layer seismic response procedures and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the latest improvements made to them. Finally, the development direction of nonlinear method programs is prospected.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China

  • Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China

  • Sections