| Peer-Reviewed

Performance Evaluation of Grade Separation Within the Selected Major Intersection in Addis Ababa City

Received: 4 July 2018    Accepted: 16 July 2018    Published: 15 August 2018
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Urban City Traffic Management introduced various remedies to decongest traffic and to reduce the severity of accidents, such as providing traffic signal controls at the intersecting roads at different levels, or grade separating the traffic movement towards different directions. One type of grade separation is Road Underpass or Flyover. The construction of Road Underpass or Flyover poses some doubts whether it is effective or ineffective on the point of views of the travelers or motorists. It is for this reason that this research sought to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of Road Underpass structure on traffic flow at the major intersection, specifically the Wellosefer intersection in Addis Ababa City. The primary data used the existing traffic volume recorded between 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM from Monday to Friday. While the secondary data obtained from the Consulting Office "before" the improvement of Wellosefer intersection, including the previous study, which served as the control analysis for the research. From these data, the analyses provided results on vehicle travel time and delay for a case "before" and "after" improvement of the intersection. SIDRA Software was used to analyze the traffic conditions of the intersection. Based on the findings of the study, a case "before" Improvement of Wellosefer Unsignalized T-Intersection indicated with an average delay of vehicles of about 535.7 seconds, and a travel time of vehicles of about 574.7 seconds. On the other hand, a case "after" Improvement of Wellosefer intersection, three alternatives considered; such as 1) Signalized T-Intersection, 2) Roundabout, and 3) Road Underpass with Roundabout at the upper level. The results of the first alternative showed the Signalized T-intersection indicated an average delay and travel time of 344.3 seconds and 365.0 seconds, respectively. It means, there could be a reduction of 15.4% in average delay if signalized intersection implemented. The second alternative, a case of Roundabout using the same traffic data at current condition, the results indicated the motorists and commuters would be experiencing an average delay of about 355.8 seconds and average travel time of 390.0 seconds. The third alternative considering Road Underpass with Roundabout at the upper level, the results revealed that there was a significant reduction in average delay of vehicles of about 42% from the Unsignalized T-Intersection. Comparing this result with the Signalized intersection using the same traffic data, it showed that there was a significant decrease in average delay. Therefore, the findings of the study, a combination of Road Underpass and Roundabout at the upper level as in the case of Wellosefer intersection performed well than the other traffic control design alternatives.

Published in American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11
Page(s) 41-49
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

“Before” and “After” Improvement, Flyover, Road Underpass, Traffic Control Design Alternatives, Travel Time & Delay, Traffic Volume, Traffic Conflict, Traffic Congestion

References
[1] Macababbad, R. J, Regin, J. R (2011). A Study on Travel Time and Delay Survey and Traffic Data Analysis and Visualization Methodology; Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol 8.
[2] Quezon, Emer T. (1994), Study on Effects of Flyover Construction of Traffic Flow: The Case of Metro Manila, SERP-P, RP NCTS 1994-01; Pp. 520-526, https://serpp.pids.gov.ph/publication_detail?id=1155.
[3] Amott, R, A. De Palama. (1991). Does Providing Information to Drivers Reduce Congestion, 309-318.
[4] Black, W. A. (2003). Transportation: a Geographical Analysis, New York: Guilford Press.
[5] Demrew W. (2009). Towards Sustainable Land Use of Urban and Peri‐Urban Areas. In Construction Ahead, Vol. 11. Addis Ababa.
[6] Department for Transport (2000b). A Measure of Road Traffic Congestion in England Research, 147-154.
[7] Addis Ababa City Roads Authority, (AACRA). Geometric Design Manual. 2004.
[8] Tarekegn K., E. T. Quezon, (2016); Effect Of Cycle Time And Signal Phase On Average Time Delay, Congestion And Level Of Service: A Case Study At Hager Astedader Signalized Intersection in Addis Ababa; IJSER, Vol 7, Issue 10, Pp524-530.
[9] J. W. Zwarteveen (2011). Urban Traffic Flow Modeling in Addis Ababa.
[10] Akcelik, R. (1991). Implementing roundabout and other Unsignalised intersection analysis method in SIDRA. Australia road research board working document WDTE91/002.
[11] HCM, Highway Capacity Manual 2000. 4th Edition.
[12] Crawford, J.,. (2011). A Michigan Toolbox for Mitigation, Traffic Congestion. Texas.
[13] Mohammad Abojaradeh (2013), Travel Time and Delay Study to Improve Public Transit System in Jordan. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, Vol. 3, No. 4. 2013.
[14] Final Report (2006). Transit Speed and Delay Studies, Florida Department of Transportation, Public Transit Office. Kittelson & Assoxiates, Inc.
[15] Yan xing, et. al (2016). Study of Vehicle Delay Based on the Vehicle Arriving Distribution at Entrance Lanes of Intersection. ScienceDirect, Procedia Engineering 137 (2016 ) 599–608.
[16] István Fi / Zsuzsanna Kovács Igazvölgyi (2014). Travel Time Delay at Pedestrian Crossings Based on Microsimulations. Periodica Polytechnica, Civil Engineering 58/1 (2014) 47–53. doi: 10.3311/PPci.7406 http:// periodicapolytechnica.org/.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sentayehu Leleisa, Emer Tucay Quezon, Teyba Wedajo. (2018). Performance Evaluation of Grade Separation Within the Selected Major Intersection in Addis Ababa City. American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 3(3), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sentayehu Leleisa; Emer Tucay Quezon; Teyba Wedajo. Performance Evaluation of Grade Separation Within the Selected Major Intersection in Addis Ababa City. Am. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2018, 3(3), 41-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sentayehu Leleisa, Emer Tucay Quezon, Teyba Wedajo. Performance Evaluation of Grade Separation Within the Selected Major Intersection in Addis Ababa City. Am J Traffic Transp Eng. 2018;3(3):41-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11,
      author = {Sentayehu Leleisa and Emer Tucay Quezon and Teyba Wedajo},
      title = {Performance Evaluation of Grade Separation Within the Selected Major Intersection in Addis Ababa City},
      journal = {American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering},
      volume = {3},
      number = {3},
      pages = {41-49},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtte.20180303.11},
      abstract = {Urban City Traffic Management introduced various remedies to decongest traffic and to reduce the severity of accidents, such as providing traffic signal controls at the intersecting roads at different levels, or grade separating the traffic movement towards different directions. One type of grade separation is Road Underpass or Flyover. The construction of Road Underpass or Flyover poses some doubts whether it is effective or ineffective on the point of views of the travelers or motorists. It is for this reason that this research sought to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of Road Underpass structure on traffic flow at the major intersection, specifically the Wellosefer intersection in Addis Ababa City. The primary data used the existing traffic volume recorded between 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM from Monday to Friday. While the secondary data obtained from the Consulting Office "before" the improvement of Wellosefer intersection, including the previous study, which served as the control analysis for the research. From these data, the analyses provided results on vehicle travel time and delay for a case "before" and "after" improvement of the intersection. SIDRA Software was used to analyze the traffic conditions of the intersection. Based on the findings of the study, a case "before" Improvement of Wellosefer Unsignalized T-Intersection indicated with an average delay of vehicles of about 535.7 seconds, and a travel time of vehicles of about 574.7 seconds. On the other hand, a case "after" Improvement of Wellosefer intersection, three alternatives considered; such as 1) Signalized T-Intersection, 2) Roundabout, and 3) Road Underpass with Roundabout at the upper level. The results of the first alternative showed the Signalized T-intersection indicated an average delay and travel time of 344.3 seconds and 365.0 seconds, respectively. It means, there could be a reduction of 15.4% in average delay if signalized intersection implemented. The second alternative, a case of Roundabout using the same traffic data at current condition, the results indicated the motorists and commuters would be experiencing an average delay of about 355.8 seconds and average travel time of 390.0 seconds. The third alternative considering Road Underpass with Roundabout at the upper level, the results revealed that there was a significant reduction in average delay of vehicles of about 42% from the Unsignalized T-Intersection. Comparing this result with the Signalized intersection using the same traffic data, it showed that there was a significant decrease in average delay. Therefore, the findings of the study, a combination of Road Underpass and Roundabout at the upper level as in the case of Wellosefer intersection performed well than the other traffic control design alternatives.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Performance Evaluation of Grade Separation Within the Selected Major Intersection in Addis Ababa City
    AU  - Sentayehu Leleisa
    AU  - Emer Tucay Quezon
    AU  - Teyba Wedajo
    Y1  - 2018/08/15
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11
    T2  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
    SP  - 41
    EP  - 49
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8604
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20180303.11
    AB  - Urban City Traffic Management introduced various remedies to decongest traffic and to reduce the severity of accidents, such as providing traffic signal controls at the intersecting roads at different levels, or grade separating the traffic movement towards different directions. One type of grade separation is Road Underpass or Flyover. The construction of Road Underpass or Flyover poses some doubts whether it is effective or ineffective on the point of views of the travelers or motorists. It is for this reason that this research sought to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of Road Underpass structure on traffic flow at the major intersection, specifically the Wellosefer intersection in Addis Ababa City. The primary data used the existing traffic volume recorded between 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM from Monday to Friday. While the secondary data obtained from the Consulting Office "before" the improvement of Wellosefer intersection, including the previous study, which served as the control analysis for the research. From these data, the analyses provided results on vehicle travel time and delay for a case "before" and "after" improvement of the intersection. SIDRA Software was used to analyze the traffic conditions of the intersection. Based on the findings of the study, a case "before" Improvement of Wellosefer Unsignalized T-Intersection indicated with an average delay of vehicles of about 535.7 seconds, and a travel time of vehicles of about 574.7 seconds. On the other hand, a case "after" Improvement of Wellosefer intersection, three alternatives considered; such as 1) Signalized T-Intersection, 2) Roundabout, and 3) Road Underpass with Roundabout at the upper level. The results of the first alternative showed the Signalized T-intersection indicated an average delay and travel time of 344.3 seconds and 365.0 seconds, respectively. It means, there could be a reduction of 15.4% in average delay if signalized intersection implemented. The second alternative, a case of Roundabout using the same traffic data at current condition, the results indicated the motorists and commuters would be experiencing an average delay of about 355.8 seconds and average travel time of 390.0 seconds. The third alternative considering Road Underpass with Roundabout at the upper level, the results revealed that there was a significant reduction in average delay of vehicles of about 42% from the Unsignalized T-Intersection. Comparing this result with the Signalized intersection using the same traffic data, it showed that there was a significant decrease in average delay. Therefore, the findings of the study, a combination of Road Underpass and Roundabout at the upper level as in the case of Wellosefer intersection performed well than the other traffic control design alternatives.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Highway Engineering Stream, Institute of Technology, Dire Dawa University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Technology, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

  • Highway Engineering Stream, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Sections