It is a fact that there are differences between study results about frequency and forms of peer bullying. Thus, we come to the problem, do students in our school properly recognize bullying, what is the rate of correlation between different bullying forms (physical, verbal, social, sexual and electronic), and the rate of correlation between exposure to different bullying forms. The obtained results have shown that showing and exposure to peer bullying among students are very dif-ferent considering examined variables of gender, school location, age, and using social networks and influence of sports. There are also differences inside the categories of peer bullying, so according to the data obtained for distribution of exposure to peer bullying regarding school location (rural- urban area), gender and age of students the most frequent bullying form is psychological violence, while sexual bullying is relatively less common.
| Published in | International Journal of Elementary Education (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12 |
| Page(s) | 8-15 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Peer Bullying, Family Education, Rapist, Victim
| [1] | Bachrach, C. A. (1980). "Childlessness and Social Isolation among the Elderly". Journal of Marriage and Family 42 (3): p.p. 627–37. |
| [2] | Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., O’Brennan, M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimizationat school: Perceptual differ-ences between students and school staff, School Psychology Review, 36 (3), p.p. 361–382. |
| [3] | Brankovic, D. (2010). Formal and unformal bullying at school.In summary of school bullying: manual for schools, Banja Luka: Facolty of Phylosophy. p.p. 27-45. |
| [4] | Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (10): p.p. 447–54. |
| [5] | Djordjevic, B. i Djordjevic, J. (1988). Students about cha-racteristics of teachers. Belgrade: Prosveta. |
| [6] | Gasic-Pavisic, S. (2004b). Bullying at school and possibilities of prevention. In the summary Social behavior of students, Belgrade: IPI. p.p.193-220. |
| [7] | Halmos, P. (2001). Solitude and Privacy: A Study of Social Isolation Its Causes and Therapy. Routledge (re-print). |
| [8] | Herttua, K., Martikainen, P., Vahtera, J., Kivimäki, M. (2011). Living Alone and Alcohol-Related Mortality: A Popula-ton-Based Cohort Study from Finland. PLoS Medicine 8 (9): e1001094. |
| [9] | House, J. S. (2001). Social Isolation Kills, But How and Why? Psychosomatic Medicine 63 (2): p.p. 273–274. |
| [10] | Kingerz, P.M., Ph.D.,MPH, Coggeshall, M.B. and Alford, A.A. (2005). Violence at school: Recent Evidence from Four National Surveys. Pacific Institute for researc and Evaluation, Rockuille, MD. |
| [11] | McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades. American Sociological Review 71 (3): p.p.353–375. |
| [12] | Milanovic, A. (2004). Corelation of different forms of bullying and sociometric status within children in primary school [Diploma paper]. Educational Institution in Zagreb, Facolty of Phylology. |
| [13] | Milosavljevic, M. (1998). Diagnosis of basic terms of the study. In sommery Violence upon children ,Belgrade: Facolty of Political Science. p.p. 9-46. |
| [14] | Newman, B. M., Newman, P. R. (2011). Isolation: Devel-opment Through Life: A Psychosocial Approach. Wadsworth. |
| [15] | Olweus, D. (1998). Bullying at school-What we know and what we can do. Zagreb: School book. |
| [16] | Popadic, D. i Plut, D. (2007). Bullying in primary school in Serbia: forms and frequency. Psychology n. 40, p.p.309–328. |
| [17] | Popadic, D. (2009). Bullying at school. Belgrade: Institut of Pedagogy, UNICEF. |
| [18] | Smith Blau, Z. (1961). "Structural Constraints on Friendships in Old Age". American Sociological Review 26 (3): p.p. 429–39. |
| [19] | Smith, P. K., & Samara, M. (2003). Evaluation of the DfES antibullying pack, Research Brief. No: RBX06–03. London: DfES. |
| [20] | Waasdorp, T.E., Pas, E.T., O’Brennan, L.M., Bradshaw, C.P. (2011). A Multilevel Perspective on the Climate of Bullying: Discrepancies Among Students, School Staff, and Parents. J Sch Violence; 10(2),p.p. 115–132. |
APA Style
Bisera Jevtić. (2013). Showing and Exposure to Peer Bullying in a Sample of Serbian Students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12
ACS Style
Bisera Jevtić. Showing and Exposure to Peer Bullying in a Sample of Serbian Students. Int. J. Elem. Educ. 2013, 2(1), 8-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12
AMA Style
Bisera Jevtić. Showing and Exposure to Peer Bullying in a Sample of Serbian Students. Int J Elem Educ. 2013;2(1):8-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12,
author = {Bisera Jevtić},
title = {Showing and Exposure to Peer Bullying in a Sample of Serbian Students},
journal = {International Journal of Elementary Education},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {8-15},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijedu.20130201.12},
abstract = {It is a fact that there are differences between study results about frequency and forms of peer bullying. Thus, we come to the problem, do students in our school properly recognize bullying, what is the rate of correlation between different bullying forms (physical, verbal, social, sexual and electronic), and the rate of correlation between exposure to different bullying forms. The obtained results have shown that showing and exposure to peer bullying among students are very dif-ferent considering examined variables of gender, school location, age, and using social networks and influence of sports. There are also differences inside the categories of peer bullying, so according to the data obtained for distribution of exposure to peer bullying regarding school location (rural- urban area), gender and age of students the most frequent bullying form is psychological violence, while sexual bullying is relatively less common.},
year = {2013}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Showing and Exposure to Peer Bullying in a Sample of Serbian Students AU - Bisera Jevtić Y1 - 2013/02/20 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12 T2 - International Journal of Elementary Education JF - International Journal of Elementary Education JO - International Journal of Elementary Education SP - 8 EP - 15 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7640 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijedu.20130201.12 AB - It is a fact that there are differences between study results about frequency and forms of peer bullying. Thus, we come to the problem, do students in our school properly recognize bullying, what is the rate of correlation between different bullying forms (physical, verbal, social, sexual and electronic), and the rate of correlation between exposure to different bullying forms. The obtained results have shown that showing and exposure to peer bullying among students are very dif-ferent considering examined variables of gender, school location, age, and using social networks and influence of sports. There are also differences inside the categories of peer bullying, so according to the data obtained for distribution of exposure to peer bullying regarding school location (rural- urban area), gender and age of students the most frequent bullying form is psychological violence, while sexual bullying is relatively less common. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: