| Peer-Reviewed

Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain Instructional Strategies: Towards Enhancing Basic Science Practical Skills of Lower Primary School Pupils

Received: 19 July 2015    Accepted: 4 August 2015    Published: 26 September 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of generative instructional strategy (GIS) and Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) in enhancing Basic Science practical skills of lower primary school pupils. It also compared the effects of the strategies on the Basic Science Practical Skills of the pupils. These were with a view to determining the effectiveness of the strategies in improving the practical skills of the lower primary school pupils in Basic Science. The study adopted the pre-test, post-test, control group, quasi-experimental research design. Three primary schools were selected from Ondo State in Nigeria using simple random sampling technique. Primary III pupils from three intact classes with class size between 25 - 35 pupils were purposively selected for the study. The instrument used for data collection was “Pupils’ Basic Science Practical Skills Test” (PBSPST) which was designed to test learners’ knowledge of Basic Science practical skills. Data collected were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The result showed that there was no significant effect of GIS on primary school pupils’ Basic Science practical skills while there was a significant effect of POE instructional strategy on pupils’ Basic Science practical skills. Furthermore, result showed that there was a significant difference in the effects of generative and POE instructional strategies on pupils’ Basic Science practical skills in favour of the POE instructional strategy compared with that of the GIS. The study concluded that the POE instructional strategy is a more effective means of improving Basic Science practical skills of lower primary school pupils and therefore recommends that primary school teachers should employ the use of this method in enhancing teaching and learning of Basic Science process skills.

Published in International Journal of Elementary Education (Volume 4, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12
Page(s) 86-92
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Predict-Observe-Explain, Generative, Basic Science, Practical Skills, Instructional Strategy

References
[1] Ajayi, H. O. (2009). Classroom Environment: Another Teacher of the Pre-School Children. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education (Special Edition).
[2] Aregbesola, T. O. (2003). Dissemination of Science and Technological Knowledge in Nigeria Primary School Level. In Ehindero O. J. and Aladejana F. O. (Eds) Readings in Early Childhood Education, Literamed Publications Limited, Ghana, pp 234-246.
[3] Ausubel, D. P. (1968).Education Psychology A Cognitive View. New York: Grune and Stratton.
[4] Babajide, V. F. T. (2010). Fostering the Development of Practical Skills among Secondary School Physics Students: Implications for Science Teaching. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education. (Special Edition, Vol. 2.).
[5] Bello, T. O. (2011). Effect of group instructional strategy on students’ performance in selected Physics concepts. The African Symposium: An on-line Journal of African Educational Research Network, 11(1), 71-79.
[6] Bello, T. O. (2012). Effect of Availability and Utilization of Physics Laboratory Equipment on Students’ Academic Achievement in Senior Secondary Schools Physics. World Journal of Education. Vol. 2 (5), 1-7.
[7] Danjuma, I. M. (2009).The Use of Concept Mapping and Activity Based Strategies for teaching of primary Science. A paper presented at workshop organized by Bauchi State SUBEB in collaboration with Garu Consults Ltd. 26th - 28th March, 2009.
[8] Emilly, H. and Zee, V. (2000). Analysis of Students’ Generated Inquiry Discussion. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 22 no. 2: 115-147.
[9] Ezeliora, B. (2004). Motivating Secondary School Science Teacher to face the Challenges of third Millennium. Journal of the Science Teacher Association of Nigeria. Vol, 39, no. 1 & 2.
[10] Federal Republic of Nigeria (2004). National Policy on Education. Lagos: NERDC Press.
[11] Iroegbu, T. O. (1998). Problem-based Learning, Numerical Ability and Gender as Determinants of Achievement in Line Graphing Skills in Senior Secondary Physics. An Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
[12] Iroegbu, V. I. (2009).Enriching English Language Teaching and Learning in Early Childhood Classroom through Modeling Strategy. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, vol. 2.
[13] Isbell, R (2007). An environment that positively impact young children. Early Childhood NEWS; the Professional Resources for Teachers and Parents Excellence Learning Corporation.
[14] Johnson, D. and Johnson, R. (1991).Learning Together and Alone Cooperation, Competition and Individualization. New Jersey, Prentice Hall inc. Endlewood Cliffs.
[15] Kalijah, M. S. (2002). Education, Training and Careers in Physics for Women in Malaysia. IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics, UNESCO. Paris France.
[16] Longjohn, I. T. (2009). Effect of Game Method of Teaching in Students' Academic Achievement in Chemistry. Journal of the Science Teacher Association of Nigeria, Vol 44 (1 &2).
[17] Maduewesi, E. J. (1999). Early Childhood Education; Theory and practice. Lagos: Macmillan Nigeria publishers.
[18] Njoku, Z. C. (1999). A scale for the assessment of students' chemistry practical skills in secondary schools. Journal of the Science Teacher Association of Nigeria, Vol 34, nos 1 & 2, 83 - 89.
[19] Nwagbara, C. (2003). Early Years Learning; Related Issues in Early Childhood Education. TAIT Publications, Ibadan.
[20] Oginni, A. M. (2009). Selected Students Aptitude Indices and School Factors as Predictors of Senior Secondary School Students Learning Outcomes in Chemistry in Lagos State. An Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis University of Ibadan.
[21] Ogunleye, B. O. and Babajide, V. F. (2011). Generative Instructional Strategy Enhances Senior Secondary Schools Students’ Achievement in Physics. European Journal of Educational Studies, 3(3), 453 – 461.
[22] Okoli, J. N. (2006). Effects of Investigative Laboratory Approach and Exposition Retrieval of Acquisition of Science Process Skills by Biology Students of different levels of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, Vol. 41, nos. 1& 2.
[23] Okoronka, A. U. (2004). Model Based Instructional Strategies as Determinants of Students’ Learning Outcomes in Secondary Physics in Lagos State. An Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
[24] White, B. and Gunstone, R. F., Champagne, A. B., &Klopfer, L.E. (1981). Instruction for Understanding: A Case Study. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 27(3), 27-32.
[25] Wittrock, M. C. (1991). Generative Teaching of Comprehension. Elementary School Journal, Vol. 92, No. 2, 169-180.
[26] Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative Learning Process of the Brain. Educational Psychologist. pp 27.
[27] Zuziwe, M. (2006). Using the Predict-Observe-Explain Technique to Enhance the Students' Understanding of Chemical Reaction. (Short report on pilot study).University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved from: mthembuz@und.nuiza.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Famakinwa Adebayo, Bello Theodora Olufunke. (2015). Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain Instructional Strategies: Towards Enhancing Basic Science Practical Skills of Lower Primary School Pupils. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Famakinwa Adebayo; Bello Theodora Olufunke. Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain Instructional Strategies: Towards Enhancing Basic Science Practical Skills of Lower Primary School Pupils. Int. J. Elem. Educ. 2015, 4(4), 86-92. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Famakinwa Adebayo, Bello Theodora Olufunke. Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain Instructional Strategies: Towards Enhancing Basic Science Practical Skills of Lower Primary School Pupils. Int J Elem Educ. 2015;4(4):86-92. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12,
      author = {Famakinwa Adebayo and Bello Theodora Olufunke},
      title = {Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain Instructional Strategies: Towards Enhancing Basic Science Practical Skills of Lower Primary School Pupils},
      journal = {International Journal of Elementary Education},
      volume = {4},
      number = {4},
      pages = {86-92},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeedu.20150404.12},
      abstract = {The study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of generative instructional strategy (GIS) and Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) in enhancing Basic Science practical skills of lower primary school pupils. It also compared the effects of the strategies on the Basic Science Practical Skills of the pupils. These were with a view to determining the effectiveness of the strategies in improving the practical skills of the lower primary school pupils in Basic Science. The study adopted the pre-test, post-test, control group, quasi-experimental research design. Three primary schools were selected from Ondo State in Nigeria using simple random sampling technique. Primary III pupils from three intact classes with class size between 25 - 35 pupils were purposively selected for the study. The instrument used for data collection was “Pupils’ Basic Science Practical Skills Test” (PBSPST) which was designed to test learners’ knowledge of Basic Science practical skills. Data collected were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The result showed that there was no significant effect of GIS on primary school pupils’ Basic Science practical skills while there was a significant effect of POE instructional strategy on pupils’ Basic Science practical skills. Furthermore, result showed that there was a significant difference in the effects of generative and POE instructional strategies on pupils’ Basic Science practical skills in favour of the POE instructional strategy compared with that of the GIS. The study concluded that the POE instructional strategy is a more effective means of improving Basic Science practical skills of lower primary school pupils and therefore recommends that primary school teachers should employ the use of this method in enhancing teaching and learning of Basic Science process skills.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain Instructional Strategies: Towards Enhancing Basic Science Practical Skills of Lower Primary School Pupils
    AU  - Famakinwa Adebayo
    AU  - Bello Theodora Olufunke
    Y1  - 2015/09/26
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12
    T2  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    JF  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    JO  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    SP  - 86
    EP  - 92
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7640
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12
    AB  - The study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of generative instructional strategy (GIS) and Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) in enhancing Basic Science practical skills of lower primary school pupils. It also compared the effects of the strategies on the Basic Science Practical Skills of the pupils. These were with a view to determining the effectiveness of the strategies in improving the practical skills of the lower primary school pupils in Basic Science. The study adopted the pre-test, post-test, control group, quasi-experimental research design. Three primary schools were selected from Ondo State in Nigeria using simple random sampling technique. Primary III pupils from three intact classes with class size between 25 - 35 pupils were purposively selected for the study. The instrument used for data collection was “Pupils’ Basic Science Practical Skills Test” (PBSPST) which was designed to test learners’ knowledge of Basic Science practical skills. Data collected were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The result showed that there was no significant effect of GIS on primary school pupils’ Basic Science practical skills while there was a significant effect of POE instructional strategy on pupils’ Basic Science practical skills. Furthermore, result showed that there was a significant difference in the effects of generative and POE instructional strategies on pupils’ Basic Science practical skills in favour of the POE instructional strategy compared with that of the GIS. The study concluded that the POE instructional strategy is a more effective means of improving Basic Science practical skills of lower primary school pupils and therefore recommends that primary school teachers should employ the use of this method in enhancing teaching and learning of Basic Science process skills.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Institute of Education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria

  • Institute of Education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria

  • Sections