| Peer-Reviewed

Using Motivational Tactics to Support Children with Reading Disabilities

Received: 13 September 2014    Accepted: 24 September 2014    Published: 30 September 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This paper presents Reading Rocks, a literacy program for children with reading disabilities. In addition to component literacy skill areas (i.e. phonics, sight word vocabulary) Reading Rocks focuses on motivational tactics aimed to promote children’s task understanding, goal setting, and monitoring. The motivational tactics adopted by the Reading Rocks program correspond with the self-regulated learning model and are applied to reading interventions. This paper reviews the theoretical underpinnings of self-regulated learning and reading disabilities and also presents illustrations and descriptions of how motivational tactics within Reading Rocks were designed.

Published in International Journal of Elementary Education (Volume 3, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11
Page(s) 92-97
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Learning Disabilities, Motivation, Literacy

References
[1] Afflerbach, P. (2000). Verbal reports and protocol analysis. In M. L. M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 163–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[2] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
[3] Bannert, M & Mengelkamp, C (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? Metacognition Learning, 3, 39–58.
[4] Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32, 557-582.
[5] Crosnoe, R., Leventhal, T., Wirth, R. J., Pierce, K. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Family socioeconomic status and consistent environmental stimulation in early childhood. Child Development, 81, 972-987.
[6] Elliot, A. J., Shell, M. M., Henry, K. B., & Maier, M. A. (2005). Achievement Goals, Performance Contingencies, and Performance Attainment: An Experimental Test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 630.
[7] Holtzheuser, S., McNamara, J., Short, A., (2014). Self-regulation and motivation in children at-risk for learning disabilities, Exceptionalities Education International, 24 (1), 2-17.
[8] Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
[9] Margolis, H., McCabe, P. (2004) Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. The Clearing House, 77, 6. 241-249.
[10] McNamara, J. Short, A. & Scruton, H. (2014). Reading Rocks: An intervention program to support vulnerable readers, The Research Institute for Learning Differences, St.Cath., ON.
[11] Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R. A., Steinbach, K. A., Frijters, J. C., & Shapiro, M. B. (2012). Multiple-Component Remediation for Developmental Reading Disabilities IQ, Socioeconomic Status, and Race as Factors in Remedial Outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 99-127.
[12] National Reading Panel (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching students to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
[13] Ostiguy, J. (2000). "The Cognitive Skills‐Building and Reintegration Program", Let's Talk, vol. 25 no. 2. Sector Reports, Correctional Operations and Programs Sector, Correctional Service Canada.
[14] Schunk, D. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
[15] Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[16] Vaughn, S., & Roberts, G. (2007). Secondary interventions in reading. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 40-46.
[17] Wilson, A. M., Armstrong, C. D., Furrie, A., & Walcot, E. (2009). The mental health of Canadians with self-reported learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 24-40.
[18] Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[19] Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Hilary Scruton, John McNamara. (2014). Using Motivational Tactics to Support Children with Reading Disabilities. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(4), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Hilary Scruton; John McNamara. Using Motivational Tactics to Support Children with Reading Disabilities. Int. J. Elem. Educ. 2014, 3(4), 92-97. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Hilary Scruton, John McNamara. Using Motivational Tactics to Support Children with Reading Disabilities. Int J Elem Educ. 2014;3(4):92-97. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11,
      author = {Hilary Scruton and John McNamara},
      title = {Using Motivational Tactics to Support Children with Reading Disabilities},
      journal = {International Journal of Elementary Education},
      volume = {3},
      number = {4},
      pages = {92-97},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeedu.20140304.11},
      abstract = {This paper presents Reading Rocks, a literacy program for children with reading disabilities. In addition to component literacy skill areas (i.e. phonics, sight word vocabulary) Reading Rocks focuses on motivational tactics aimed to promote children’s task understanding, goal setting, and monitoring. The motivational tactics adopted by the Reading Rocks program correspond with the self-regulated learning model and are applied to reading interventions. This paper reviews the theoretical underpinnings of self-regulated learning and reading disabilities and also presents illustrations and descriptions of how motivational tactics within Reading Rocks were designed.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Using Motivational Tactics to Support Children with Reading Disabilities
    AU  - Hilary Scruton
    AU  - John McNamara
    Y1  - 2014/09/30
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11
    T2  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    JF  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    JO  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    SP  - 92
    EP  - 97
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7640
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20140304.11
    AB  - This paper presents Reading Rocks, a literacy program for children with reading disabilities. In addition to component literacy skill areas (i.e. phonics, sight word vocabulary) Reading Rocks focuses on motivational tactics aimed to promote children’s task understanding, goal setting, and monitoring. The motivational tactics adopted by the Reading Rocks program correspond with the self-regulated learning model and are applied to reading interventions. This paper reviews the theoretical underpinnings of self-regulated learning and reading disabilities and also presents illustrations and descriptions of how motivational tactics within Reading Rocks were designed.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Child and Youth Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

  • Child and Youth Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

  • Sections