Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender

Jamie Haig Marr Costley; Han Sueng-Lock; Lee Ji-Eun

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender

Jamie Haig Marr Costley, Han Sueng-Lock, Lee Ji-Eun

Published in International Journal of Secondary Education (Volume 1, Issue 6)

Received: 23 October 2013 Accepted: Published: 10 December 2013

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This study compares the responses to bullying incidents of 101 forth year preservice teacher trainees in an education college in central South Korea. The subjects were asked to respond to 6 vignettes that varied in the types of bullying, relational, verbal or physical and in the gender of the students in the vignettes in that they either took place at a girls’ high school or boys’ high school. They were then asked what they would do with the perpetrators and the victims of the bullying. The subjects were much more likely to respond to physical and verbal bullying than relational bullying and when they did respond they took stronger action for both victims and perpetrators of verbal and physical bullying. When comparing the responses across the gender of the high school students the respondents were more likely to respond to cases of male physical bullying if the respondents themselves were male and to female relational bullying if the respondents themselves were female. This research suggests that preservice teachers require more in depth training in how to deal with differing bullying types.

Published in	International Journal of Secondary Education (Volume 1, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11
Page(s)	45-52
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Bullying, Gender, Vignettes, Relational, Preservice Teachers

References

[1]	Bauman, S., Rio, D. R. (2006). Preservice teachers’ responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 1, 219-231.
[2]	Byers, D., Caltabiano, N., Caltbiano, M. (2011). Teachers’ attitudes to overt and covert bullying, and perceived efficacy to intervene. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 36 (11), 105-119.
[3]	Cooper, D., & Snell, J. L. (2003). Bullying. Educational Leadership, March, 22-25.
[4]	Chee, F. (2006) The games we play online and offline: Making wang-tta in Korea. Popular Communication, 4(3), 225-239.
[5]	Craig, W. M., Henderson, K. & Murphy, J. G. (2000) Prospective teachers’ attitudes toward bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, Vol. 21 (1). 5-21.
[6]	Craig, W. M. & Pepler D. J. (2003) Identifying and Targeting Risk for Involvement in Bullying and Victimization. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 48, No 9. Pg 577 – 582
[7]	Doe, S. J. (2000). Cultural factors in child maltreatment and domestic violence in Korea. Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 22, 231-236.
[8]	Fleming, L. C., Jacobson, K., H. (2009). Bullying among middle school students in low and middle income countries. Heath Promotion International, Vol. 25 No. 1, 73-84.
[9]	Garbino, J., & deLara, E. (2003). Words Can Hurt Forever. Educational Leadership, March, 18-21.
[10]	Goldstein, J. S. (2001) War and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[11]	Hahm, H. C., Guterman, N. B. (2001). The emerging problem of physical child abuse in South Korea. Child Maltreatment, Vol. 6, 169-179.
[12]	Holt, M. K., Keyes, M. A., (2004) Teachers’ attitudes toward bullying. In: Espelage DL & Swearer SM (eds). Bullying in American schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.
[13]	Jacobson, K. E., Bauman, S. (2007) Bullying in schools: Counselors’ responses to three types of bullying incidents. Professional School Counseling, Vol. 11, 1-9.
[14]	Kim, Y. S., Koh, Y. J. & Leventhal, B. (2004). Prevelance of school bullying in Korean middle school students. Archives of Pediatric &. Adolescent Medicine, 158, 737-741.
[15]	Kim, Y. S., Koh, Y. J. & Leventhal, B. (2005). School Bullying and Suicidal Risk in Korean Middle School Students. Pediatrics, Vol. 115 No. 2 February, 357-363.
[16]	Kim, Y. S., Leventhal, B., Koh, Y. J., & Boyce, W. T. (2009). Bullying increased suicide risk: Prospective study of Korean adolescents. Archives of Suicide Research, 13, 15-30.
[17]	Kim, Y. T. & Park, H. S. (1997) The survey on bullying among adolescents. Korean Youth Counseling Institute. Youth Counseling Problem Study, 29.
[18]	Koo, H. (2007) A time line of the evolution of school bullying in differing social contexts. Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 8 No. 1, 107-116.
[19]	Koo, H. Kwak, K. Smith P. K. (2008). Victimization in Korean Schools: The Nature, Incidence, and Distinctive Features of Korean Bullying or Wang-Ta. Journal of School Violence, 7:4, 119-139.
[20]	Lee, C. & Kwak, K. (2000). Bullying at school: Actual condition and characteristics. Seoul: Gipmoondang.
[21]	Lee, K. C. (2003) School bullying in Korea and Christian educational approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 75-83.
[22]	Marachi, R., Astor, R. A., & Benbenishty, R. (2007). Effects of teacher avoidance of school policies on student victimization. School Psychology International, 28, 501-518.
[23]	Mishna, F., Scarcello, I., Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2005). Teachers’ understanding of bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 718-738.
[24]	Nicolaides, S., Toda, Y., & Smith, P. K. (2002) Knowledge and attitudes about school bullying in trainee teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72. 105-118.
[25]	OECD (2012). Indicator D1 How much time do students spend in the classroom? in OECD, Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing.
[26]	Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
[27]	Olweus, D. (1995). Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 196-200.
[28]	Park, K. S., Son, H. K. & Song, K. M. (1998). A survey on Gipdan-gorophim (group harassment). Seoul: Korea Institute of Education Development.
[29]	Reid, P., Monsen, J., & Rivers, I. (2004). Psychology’s contribution to understanding and managing bullying within schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20, 241-258.
[30]	Salmon, G., James, A., & Smith, D. M. (1996). Bullying in schools: Self reported anxiety, depression and self esteem in secondary school children. BMJ 313, 17-19.
[31]	Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational
[32]	forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates.
[33]	Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 261-275.
[34]	Sharp, S., Thompson, D., & Arora, T. (2000). How Long Before it Hurts? An Investigation into Long-term Bullying. School Psychology International, Vol.21(1) 37-46.
[35]	Shin, S., & Koh, M. (2005). Korean education in cultural context. Essays in Education, 14. Retrieved from http://www.usca.edu/essays/vol14summer2005.html
[36]	Smith, J.D., Cousins, J.B., & Stewart, R. (2005). Anti-bullying interventions in schools:
[37]	ingredients of effective programs. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 739-62.
[38]	Smith, P. K. (2004). Bullying: Recent developments. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9, 98-103.
[39]	Smith, P. K., & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive behavior, 26, 1-9.
[40]	Statistics Korea (2010). Causes of death statistics in 2010. Daejeon: International Cooperation Div.
[41]	Yang, S-J., Kim, J-M., Kim, S-W., & Yoon, J-S. (2006) Bullying and victimization behaviors in boys and girls at South Korean primary schools. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 69-77.
[42]	Yoon, J. S., & Barton, E. (2008). The role of teachers in school violence and bullying prevention. In T. Miller (Ed.), School violence and primary prevention (249-275). New York, NY: Springer.
[43]	Yoon, J., Bauman, S., Choi, T., & Hutchinson, A. S., (2011). How South Korean teachers handle an incident of school bullying. School Psychology International, 32(3), 312-329.
[44]	Yoon, J. S., & Kerber, K. (2003). Bullying: Elementary teachers’ attitudes and intervention strategies. Research in Education, 69, 27 – 34.
[45]	Whitted, K.S. & Dupper, D.R. (2005). Best Practices for Preventing or Reducing Bullying in Schools. Children and Schools, Vol. 27, No. 3, July 2005, pp. 167-175(9).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jamie Haig Marr Costley, Han Sueng-Lock, Lee Ji-Eun. (2013). Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender. International Journal of Secondary Education, 1(6), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jamie Haig Marr Costley; Han Sueng-Lock; Lee Ji-Eun. Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender. Int. J. Second. Educ. 2013, 1(6), 45-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jamie Haig Marr Costley, Han Sueng-Lock, Lee Ji-Eun. Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender. Int J Second Educ. 2013;1(6):45-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11,
  author = {Jamie Haig Marr Costley and Han Sueng-Lock and Lee Ji-Eun},
  title = {Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender},
  journal = {International Journal of Secondary Education},
  volume = {1},
  number = {6},
  pages = {45-52},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsedu.20130106.11},
  abstract = {This study compares the responses to bullying incidents of 101 forth year preservice teacher trainees in an education college in central South Korea. The subjects were asked to respond to 6 vignettes that varied in the types of bullying, relational, verbal or physical and in the gender of the students in the vignettes in that they either took place at a girls’ high school or boys’ high school. They were then asked what they would do with the perpetrators and the victims of the bullying. The subjects were much more likely to respond to physical and verbal bullying than relational bullying and when they did respond they took stronger action for both victims and perpetrators of verbal and physical bullying. When comparing the responses across the gender of the high school students the respondents were more likely to respond to cases of male physical bullying if the respondents themselves were male and to female relational bullying if the respondents themselves were female. This research suggests that preservice teachers require more in depth training in how to deal with differing bullying types.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender
AU  - Jamie Haig Marr Costley
AU  - Han Sueng-Lock
AU  - Lee Ji-Eun
Y1  - 2013/12/10
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11
T2  - International Journal of Secondary Education
JF  - International Journal of Secondary Education
JO  - International Journal of Secondary Education
SP  - 45
EP  - 52
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7472
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11
AB  - This study compares the responses to bullying incidents of 101 forth year preservice teacher trainees in an education college in central South Korea. The subjects were asked to respond to 6 vignettes that varied in the types of bullying, relational, verbal or physical and in the gender of the students in the vignettes in that they either took place at a girls’ high school or boys’ high school. They were then asked what they would do with the perpetrators and the victims of the bullying. The subjects were much more likely to respond to physical and verbal bullying than relational bullying and when they did respond they took stronger action for both victims and perpetrators of verbal and physical bullying. When comparing the responses across the gender of the high school students the respondents were more likely to respond to cases of male physical bullying if the respondents themselves were male and to female relational bullying if the respondents themselves were female. This research suggests that preservice teachers require more in depth training in how to deal with differing bullying types.
VL  - 1
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jamie Haig Marr Costley

English Education Department?, Kongju National University?, Kongju, South Korea
Han Sueng-Lock

Education Department?, Kongju National University?, Kongju, South Korea
Lee Ji-Eun

Education Department?, Kongju National University?, Kongju, South Korea

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jamie Haig Marr Costley, Han Sueng-Lock, Lee Ji-Eun. (2013). Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender. International Journal of Secondary Education, 1(6), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jamie Haig Marr Costley; Han Sueng-Lock; Lee Ji-Eun. Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender. Int. J. Second. Educ. 2013, 1(6), 45-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jamie Haig Marr Costley, Han Sueng-Lock, Lee Ji-Eun. Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender. Int J Second Educ. 2013;1(6):45-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11,
  author = {Jamie Haig Marr Costley and Han Sueng-Lock and Lee Ji-Eun},
  title = {Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender},
  journal = {International Journal of Secondary Education},
  volume = {1},
  number = {6},
  pages = {45-52},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsedu.20130106.11},
  abstract = {This study compares the responses to bullying incidents of 101 forth year preservice teacher trainees in an education college in central South Korea. The subjects were asked to respond to 6 vignettes that varied in the types of bullying, relational, verbal or physical and in the gender of the students in the vignettes in that they either took place at a girls’ high school or boys’ high school. They were then asked what they would do with the perpetrators and the victims of the bullying. The subjects were much more likely to respond to physical and verbal bullying than relational bullying and when they did respond they took stronger action for both victims and perpetrators of verbal and physical bullying. When comparing the responses across the gender of the high school students the respondents were more likely to respond to cases of male physical bullying if the respondents themselves were male and to female relational bullying if the respondents themselves were female. This research suggests that preservice teachers require more in depth training in how to deal with differing bullying types.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Preservice Teachers’ Response to Bullying Vignettes: The Effect of Bullying Type and Gender
AU  - Jamie Haig Marr Costley
AU  - Han Sueng-Lock
AU  - Lee Ji-Eun
Y1  - 2013/12/10
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11
T2  - International Journal of Secondary Education
JF  - International Journal of Secondary Education
JO  - International Journal of Secondary Education
SP  - 45
EP  - 52
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7472
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130106.11
AB  - This study compares the responses to bullying incidents of 101 forth year preservice teacher trainees in an education college in central South Korea. The subjects were asked to respond to 6 vignettes that varied in the types of bullying, relational, verbal or physical and in the gender of the students in the vignettes in that they either took place at a girls’ high school or boys’ high school. They were then asked what they would do with the perpetrators and the victims of the bullying. The subjects were much more likely to respond to physical and verbal bullying than relational bullying and when they did respond they took stronger action for both victims and perpetrators of verbal and physical bullying. When comparing the responses across the gender of the high school students the respondents were more likely to respond to cases of male physical bullying if the respondents themselves were male and to female relational bullying if the respondents themselves were female. This research suggests that preservice teachers require more in depth training in how to deal with differing bullying types.
VL  - 1
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download