International Journal of Secondary Education
Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2017, Pages: 16-21
Received: Nov. 23, 2016;
Accepted: Mar. 10, 2017;
Published: Mar. 21, 2017
Views 899 Downloads 47
Phillip Neely, Department of Criminal Justice, Saint Leo University, Saint Leo, USA
In Savannah, Georgia, the juvenile justice system often fails the community and the police department when they do not hold juveniles accountable for their criminal actions. The juvenile intake process creates a problem for law enforcement when they will not accept a juvenile offender due to certain criteria. The juvenile offender is often aware of the process and knows that the Regional Youth Detention Center will not hold them. The inadequate intake process leaves officers to continuously deal with the same repeat offenders, along with having to release the juvenile offenders to their parents because they do not meet certain detention criteria. The issues surrounding the juvenile intake process in Savannah, Georgia is not caused by one particular factor, but by several aspects that are all related. By addressing the aspects involved, it will allow one to have a better understanding of the problem. The factors surrounding this problem keep juvenile offenders on the street instead of in jail. The Georgia Juvenile Justice Reform System wants to save the state millions of dollars by keeping fewer offenders incarcerated in state run facilities. This will allow juvenile offenders to be released back into the community. The change in the juvenile justice system through the 2013 reform costs affects the detainment of juvenile offender.
Juvenile Accountability; The Intake Process, International Journal of Secondary Education.
Vol. 5, No. 2,
2017, pp. 16-21.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Brooks, J. (2013). Preventing crime and violence. Crime and Delinquency, 20 (3), 241-244.
Chambliss, W. J., & Sage Publications. (2011). Juvenile crime and justice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Curl, E. (2015, May 5). Savannah youth program aims to curb juvenile arrests. Retrieved from http://www.savannahnow.com
DeList, M., & Conis, J., P. (2012). Violent Offenders. Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice. (2nd edition). Jones and Barlett Learning. LLC.
Flynn, D. (2003) Savannah Impact Program. Excellence in Problem-Oriented Policing.
Heilbrun, K., Goldstein, N. E., & Redding, R. E. (2005). Juvenile delinquency: Prevention, assessment, and intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.
Howard, M. (2013, June 16). Chatham County braces for juvenile justice reform costs.
McGarrell, E. F. (1988). Juvenile correctional reform: Two decades of policy and procedural change. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Mears, D. P., & Kelly, W. R. (1999). Assessments and intake processes in juvenile justice
Routh, M. (2015, May 26). Savannah Impact Program Juvenile Court Supervisor. (S. Badie, Interviewer)
Saminsky, A. (2010). "Preventing Juvenile Delinquency: Early Intervention and Comprehensiveness as Critical Factors." Student Pulse, 2 (02). Retrieved From http://www.studentpulse.com/a?id=165
Sherman, L. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30 (4), 445-473.
Siegel, J. L., & Welsh, C. B. (2012). Juvenile Delinquency Theory Practice And Law. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Swanson, R. C., Territo, L., & Taylor, W. T (2008). Police Administration Structures Processes and Behavior (7th edition). Pearson Education Incorporation. Upper Saddle River New Jersey.
Territo, L., Halsted, B. J., & Brombley, L. M. (2004). Crime and justice in America. A human
Perspective. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Walls, J. (2004). Georgia’s troubled effort to reduce juvenile crime.